Channel
@Notes1111111
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
97subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001788629003 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Notes1111111 |
| Description | تأمّلٌ، وتَعَلّلٌ، وادِّكار. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Notes1111111 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 97 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 97 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 March 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 26 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
من أسباب تكرار الأمثلة في الأصول، الاستمداد الأصولي بين المذاهب للسريحي ص٧٢. وأعجب ما في هذا النقل: كلام السهروردي، الذي لا ناقة له في الفقه ولا جمل، إنما هو فيلسوف فاسد الملة، ثم يتصدى للكلام في أصول الفقه الكبار، وما علمت أن أحدا تصدر للكلام في أصول النحو وهو لا يحسن الإعراب، أو في أصول القراءات وهو لا يحفظ القرآن، أما أصول الفقه: فهو حمىً مستباح، حدث عن العادين عليه من غير أهله ولا حرج! وأعجب من السهروردي وأمثاله:…
رُفعَ على ' أثَارة' بترجمتي المقال المطوّل والمحوري: 'النساء في سوق العمل (الأمريكي)' من أهم المقالات المنشورة في الثمانينات - ضمن The New York Review - وما زالت مضامينه وهمومه وثيقة الصلة بحاضرنا ..
https://atharah.net/women-us-market/
ماذا لو كتبت نصوص الأفلام الوثائقية عن الطبيعة على هذه الشاكلة، الجامعة لحسن البيان ودقة الوصف؟ النص من تهذيب الحيوان للجاحظ.
"وما أنصفت مُهجةٌ تشتكي أذاها إلى غير أحبابها"
طرفة العيد :) كل عام وأنتم بخير، وتقبل الله طاعتكم 💐
إذا رأيت تسلّط الكفار وجبروتهم = فاعلم أن الله يريد البطش بهم قال شيخ الإسلام رحمه الله: "والكفار إذا أُديلوا -أي: تغلبوا وظهروا- يحصل لهم من: -الطغيان، -والعدوان، -وشدة الكفر والتكذيب = ما يستحقّون به المحق، ففي إدالتهم ما يمحقهم الله به!" شرح الأصبهانية [٢/٦٧٦].
في اختيار صنعة حسنة للولد «وقد استحب بعض العلماء أن لا يعلم الإنسانُ ولده صنعةً تكون فيها مخالطة النساء، لما يُخشَى من توقع الفساد، ولأن ذلك يكسب الرجلَ التخنث» من فتاوى قاضي الجماعة ابن سراج الأندلسي (تـ848هـ)
"كان عبد الله بن حسن بن حسن يطوف بالبيت فنظر إلى امرأة جميلة، فمشى إلى جانبها ثم قال: أهوى هوى الدين، واللذات تعجبني ... فكيف لي بهوى اللذات والدين؟ فقالت له: دع أحدهما تنل الآخر!"
الحمد لله الذي مكن عباده من القبض على مجرم مجزرة التضامن، الحمد لله الذي شفى صدور قوم مؤمنين! لا يكدر علي مثل هذه المشاهد التي نفرح فيها بالقبض على المجرمين المفسدين، إلا ما أراه من ذلتهم وصغارهم حين يقبض عليهم، لا يدفعون عن أنفسهم شيئاً، ولا ينكرون شيئا من إجرامهم، بعد أن كانوا يتجبرون ويتكبرون على خلق الله، فيذكرني ذلك ما قاله الله عن حال أهل الشقاء يوم القيامة: (مهطعين مقنعي رؤوسهم) (وترهقهم ذلة، مالهم من الله …
هل تعرفون للمالكية المعاصرين شروحات مميزة على كتبهم الأصولية مثل تنقيح القرافي والإشارة للباجي ونحوها؟ سواءً مكتوبة أو صوتية.
من الأسئلة التي ما زلت أتطلب جوابها في الأصول: كيف نفهم الفجوة الكبيرة بين ما يقال في أهمية علم الأصول وأنه أساس الفقه الذي يبنى عليه، ومع ذلك: لا تكاد تجد في المذهب الواحد أكثر من عشرة كتب أصولية محررة! ولا يبلغ ما صنف في الأصول عشر معشار ما صنف في الفقه! نعم، ثمت أجوبة من طرف الذهن، ولكنها لا تثبت عند التحقيق، اللهم فقهنا وبصرنا، واهدنا إلى معرفة ذلك.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Notes1111111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 888,394 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"أبوحمزةَ الحنبلي"” (@Notes1111111), 97 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Notes1111111.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.