Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Why?

Channel

Why?

@NotUsered

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

12subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002567103923
TypeChannel
Username@NotUsered
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NotUsered

Growth

1214137 August 2026 — 14 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 15:4612-1
14 Aug 2026, 08:3713-1
12 Aug 2026, 01:0114no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:3114first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1816.7%
avg views ÷ 12 subscribers
Avg views / post
218
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (22 January 202629 July 2026)
Views total218
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 55s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 60056571766332498222548.1%
custom 60059988498715816922242.3%
custom 541566952791030144359.62%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
90
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 20 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
30
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NotUsered. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 January 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 22:12 UTC218 views6 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

🚬

custom 60056571766332498224custom 60059988498715816922

17 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC588 views8 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

به مناسبت روز جهانی بوسیدن، بوسیدمت گذاشتمت کنار

custom 54156695279103014435custom 60059988498715816923

9 Jul 2026, 22:32 UTC503 views6 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 60056571766332498224custom 60059988498715816922

26 Jun 2026, 00:03 UTC245 views4 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

3:33?

custom 60056571766332498222custom 60059988498715816922

23 Jun 2026, 21:40 UTC911 views5 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026
File

0:30🫯

custom 60056571766332498223custom 60059988498715816922

11 Jun 2026, 21:31 UTC≈1,030 views5 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 60059988498715816923custom 60056571766332498222

7 Jun 2026, 20:05 UTC930 views3 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 60059988498715816923

28 May 2026, 00:55 UTC581 views2 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 60056571766332498222

15 May 2026, 20:42 UTC624 views2 reactions30 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 60059988498715816922

7 May 2026, 21:44 UTC277 views1 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026

خواهیم دید چه خواهد شد`

custom 60056571766332498221

29 Apr 2026, 20:52 UTC368 views1 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 60056571766332498221

1 Apr 2026, 22:22 UTC261 views1 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 60059988498715816921

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NotUsered. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Why?” (@NotUsered), 12 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NotUsered.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.