Поизучал блокчейн, интересно стало кто именно пролил цену токена, большинство транзакций через суб-адресса привели к одному человеку, который до этого арбитржали токенами $67, покупая их например по 0.015 и продавая по 0.018 и так несколько раз, но крайний раз он купил большой объемов токенов на ~4k GRAM почти на хаях и в итоге продал большинство забрав при этом только 2522 GRAM 🎲 канал | 🎰 чат

Channel
Котяра (который Нейро)
@NotNeuroKot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
120subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002142749352 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NotNeuroKot |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NotNeuroKot |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 120 | +3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 117 | +12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 105 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 105 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 57.3%
- avg views ÷ 120 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 68.8
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 6.82%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (21 August 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 550 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
70 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 35.7% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 10.0% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 8.57% | |
| 🙈 | 4 | 5.71% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 4.29% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 4.29% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
У вас отображается данное задание?
- Да50%
- Нет50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤔2
Добавили новое партнерское задание в 67. Для выполнения нужно просто прокрутить бесплатный кейс Мелочь а приятно 🎲 канал | 🎰 чат
👍2❤1
Сразу 3 хороших новости. 1 - Мы достигли отметки в 100 подписчиков в тг канале! 🚀🚀🚀 Забавно что за это же время на ютубе (откуда и идет основной трафик) подписалось 40 человек. Ну оно и логично, я ведь просил подписываться на тг канал, а не на ютуб. 2 - Возможно (ещё не уверен) я получу бонус от самих админов 67 за весь тот контент что я делал. Не думаю что это будет прям большая сумма, но хотя бы частично покроет …
🔥9❤1
Видео как я крутил бурмалду и вышел на третье место в топе по монетам, настоящие эмоции :) https://youtu.be/C_YsrWQnkC4 🎲 канал | 🎰 чат
❤7
В чате холдеров 67 писали что этот конкурс скоро подойдет к концу, так что поторопитесь если вы хотели залить контент :) 🎲 канал | 🎰 чат
Новое видео на канале Новые правила SixSeven Club: скам перед дропом или подготовка к листингу на Binance? https://youtu.be/xgEwJg4_aGQ 🎲 канал | 🎰 чат
❤3
Добавили новое задание. Аналогия с Balling MAXXING где вам нужно было закинуть больше всего мячей. В новом же задании FISH MAXXING условие максимальное простое - нужно словить самую БОЛЬШУЮ рыбу. И награды действительно классные: 1 — $5,000 + NFT 2 — $3,000 + NFT 3 — $2,000 + NFT 4–10 — $1,000 + NFT 11–25 — $250 + NFT 26–50 — $170 + NFT 51-100 — NFT На счёт NFT просто сказано что это будет уникальная NFT для рыб…
🤔4
Открыл все наживки в Fishing 67 От 0,1 до 30 GRAM Вы уже догадываетесь что я получил за 30 GRAM? :) https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mY6WEMaZlvU 🎲 канал | 🎰 чат
❤5👍3
Решил проверить актуальную информацию, к слову люди потратили уже около $50к, а я все ещё нахожусь практически на первом месте по количеству попыток (там разрыв буквально в несколько попыток) Но интересно другое, вот как выглядит топ ребят которые потратили больше всего. Видите первое место? 3870 GRAM это по текущему курсу более $5.5k Но ещё интересней становится когда ты открываешь кошелек и смотришь на транзакции…
😱3👍1
Новое видео на канале! Советую глянуть для тех, кто ждёт дроп, в конце позитивный инсайдик https://youtu.be/vxAvj8cMEA4 🎲 канал | 🎰 чат
❤4🔥3👏1
Да, это правда те кто открывали ночью и выполнили задания - молодцы, вы словили джек пот Лично у меня более 30 миллионов монет 🎲 канал | 🎰 чат
🍾3👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @NotNeuroKot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У вас отображается данное задание?
- Да50%
- Нет50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Котяра (который Нейро)” (@NotNeuroKot), 120 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NotNeuroKot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.