Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🫟Norvfi. . .

@Norfi42

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

206subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003183437973
TypeChannel
Username@Norfi42
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Norfi42

Growth

2022062047 Aug 2026, 03:18 — 202 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:02 — 202 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:26 — 206 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:187 Aug 2026, 20:26
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 201–207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 20:26206+4
7 Aug 2026, 04:02202no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:18202first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.8%
avg views ÷ 206 subscribers
Avg views / post
154
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (31 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,467
Reactions total199
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

199 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🆒4824.1%
❤‍🔥3216.1%
3015.1%
💘2914.6%
🕊2311.6%
💋2211.1%
🔥105.03%
🍓52.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC63 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Милая коммишка

💋6🆒21💘1🕊1

6 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC153 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️NSFW ❗️ Пум пум пум... Мне очень нравится как получилось, репостните пжшк куда нибудь, а то у меня подписчики и реакции падают:( И реакции тоже ставьте, это очень вдохновляет Автор аушки https://t.me/Hattsusha_draws #jax

15💋4🔥3🆒2❤‍🔥1💘1🕊1

6 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC151 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Комикс по Марселю и Вейку. Напишите какие нибудь Хед каноны про них, или что вообще думаете о них #Навязчивые_грезы

💘4💋1🕊1🆒1

4 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC170 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хмм, нет, подождите... Мне пришла идея использовать её в своём проекте Навязчивые грезы, как одну из форм богемы Хмм допустим тогда что эту её форму зовут Мерилиан Не забывайте ставить реакции

🆒42🕊1

4 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC161 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Недавно купил вот такого адопта (второй арт) И нарисовал ей вот такой Артик, она очень миленькая, мне нравится Назову её Мерилиан #Мерилиан #Навязчивые_грезы

💘4🆒2🍓1🔥1🕊1

4 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC142 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @idjdhegjwPhoto

25 звёзд Лс @Faermumu

💘21🕊1🆒1

4 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC139 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ребят, ехал в поезде и заместо артов играл в FNF, прощаете?

❤‍🔥11🕊1

2 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC172 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Трейд с https://t.me/tSalamander Очень круто, Вейк такой мимими мммх #трейд

🆒4🍓31🕊1

2 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC136 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, вопрос... Если я нарисую что-то... 🟧⬛️🟧⬛️🟧⬛️ такое.... С ними... Никто против не будет, не отпишется?

💋9🆒3💘2🕊2

2 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC154 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Трейд с художником Мягкий знак! Очень круто, мне нравится #трейд

4🆒3🔥1🕊1

2 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC149 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Участвовал в мега коллабе группы художников! Получилось прикольно)

🆒42🔥1🕊1

2 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC155 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мне подарили Джекса в костюме горничной!!!! ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

❤‍🔥18🆒51💘1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Norfi42. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 59,560 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🫟Norvfi. . .” (@Norfi42), 206 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Norfi42.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.