Намозини кечиктириб ўқийдиган аёл ҳикояси... ➥Линкни босиб "NAMOZ VAQTLARI" каналига обуна бўлинг!👇👇 https://telegram.me/+g4sYzUvaWEowM2Ni
😢11❤5

Channel
@Nomoz_Vaqtlari_Kanali
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
106,398subscribers
-734 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001854196049 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nomoz_Vaqtlari_Kanali |
| Description | ✅ СИЗ БУ ЕРДА НАМОЗ ҲАҚИДА БАТАФСИЛ МАЪЛУМОТЛАР ОЛИШИНГИЗ МУМКИН. 📿 Дуо, зикр ва фойдали исломий видеолар ⏰ ШУНИНГДЕК, КУНЛИК НАМОЗ ВАҚТЛАРИ БЕРИБ БОРИЛАДИ. Дўстларингизни ҳам таклиф қилинг! |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nomoz_Vaqtlari_Kanali |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 106,398 | -991 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 107,389 | -1,331 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 108,720 | +5,550 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 103,170 | +14,796 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 88,374 | -2,081 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 90,455 | -1,737 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 92,192 | -2,103 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:35 | 94,295 | -1,163 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:04 | 95,458 | -891 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 96,349 | -1,145 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 97,494 | -902 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 98,396 | -2,410 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 100,806 | -1,324 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 102,130 | -425 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 102,555 | -874 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 103,429 | -998 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 104,427 | -332 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 104,759 | -1,762 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 106,521 | -585 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 107,106 | first reading |
595 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 157 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 346 of 347 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 595 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,445,690 |
| Reactions total | 4,675 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 17:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 385 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,315 reactions across 593 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5,958 | 71.7% | |
| 👍 | 1,248 | 15.0% | |
| 👏 | 386 | 4.64% | |
| 😢 | 301 | 3.62% | |
| 🥰 | 183 | 2.20% | |
| 🕊 | 92 | 1.11% | |
| 🤔 | 68 | 0.818% | |
| 😁 | 30 | 0.361% | |
| ❤🔥 | 27 | 0.325% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 0.096% | |
| 😇 | 7 | 0.084% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 0.072% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.012% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 594 of the 595 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,315 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 595 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Намозини кечиктириб ўқийдиган аёл ҳикояси... ➥Линкни босиб "NAMOZ VAQTLARI" каналига обуна бўлинг!👇👇 https://telegram.me/+g4sYzUvaWEowM2Ni
😢11❤5
Эрта ўлишни истмасангиз товуқ гўштини бу жойини асло еманг‼️ 20 йил деганда ўғлим Америкадан қайтиб келди. Хурсандчилигимдан уйда турган энг катта хўрозни сўйиб шўрва ташладим. Бир пайт ўғлим югуриб келиб шўрвани тўкиб ташлади. Жахлим чиқиб бу нима қилганинг десам, ўғлим “шукур қилинг вақтида билиб қолганимга” деб сабабини айтиб берди. Жавобидан шокка тушиб қолдим. Дарҳол телефонимни олиб, ҳаммани огоҳлантирдим. Ўғ…
❤2👏1😢1
🕌 Эртанги намоз вақтлари 📅 27-Сентябр 2026 Ҳудудингизни танланг 👇
❤10👍2👏1
Кавсар сурасидаги мўжизавий 5 Сир... ➥Линкни босиб "NAMOZ VAQTLARI" каналига обуна бўлинг!👇👇 https://telegram.me/+g4sYzUvaWEowM2Ni
❤5🥰5
ЭРИМ 2- ХОТИНГА УЙЛАНЯПТИ😢 Хотини қиз туғарверганидан эри ўғил истаб яна Хотин оляпти бунга қандай чидайди камига ҳомиладор давомини ўзингиз кўринг 🥹 Хотини эрини тўйига бормоқчи 😧 Давоми жуда қизиқ...👇
❤3
Ғам ва қарзлардан чарчадингизми унда бу зикр айнан сиз учун 📿 ➥Линкни босиб "NAMOZ VAQTLARI" каналига обуна бўлинг!👇👇 https://telegram.me/+g4sYzUvaWEowM2Ni
❤3
#Хотини_қўлга_тушди😱 Эри аёлини қилаётган ҳаракатларидан шубҳаланиб, ишдан вақтли қайтиб келади ва 😱 Ҳақиқатни билган эркак қандай йўл тутди😢 давоми ачинарли? 👇👇 👉 Давомини кўриш
❤4
Онам учун хамон боламан.... Эшитинг жуда таъсирли🥹 ➥Линкни босиб "ДУОЛАР" каналига обуна бўлинг!👇👇 https://telegram.me/+w7vNNEVOTx0yMDli
❤10
Опам жудаям меҳрибон эди.Шу сабаб ҳам поччам билан ажрашсаям тутуриқсиз поччамга раҳм қилиб унга ҳар ой пул бериб турарди.Бир йил ўтиб опам турмуш қурди.Иккинчи эри жуда бой эди.Шу сабабми энди собиқ поччам опамга канадек ёпишиб олди.Бир кун ўлдириш билан ҳам таҳдид қилибди.Опам бу шунчаки таҳдид деганди аммо ўша куни опам йўқолиб қолди.Икки кун қидириб охири полицияга бердик.Собиқ поччамни уйига бостириб бордим аммо…
❤5🤔1
Ҳомиладор аёллар ўқиши керак бўлган 3 зикр 📿 ➥Линкни босиб "НАМОЗ ВАҚТЛАРИ🌙" каналига обуна бўлинг!👇👇 https://telegram.me/+y7zSqDS-3q1kYmYy
❤4
#Дахшат 😑 Йўл четида машина тўхтатмоқчи бўлиб туришган вақтларида ўғли дадасини бегона аёл билан кўриб қолди. Эри бегона аёл билан қўлтиқлашиб ресторанга кириб кетишди. Аёли эса ўғлини олиб улар ортидан ресторанга кирди ва улар ўтирган стол олдига бориб... 😰 Охиригача кўринг аёлини қилган ишидан шокка тушасиз... 😓 Давоми... 👇
❤6
Ёнингда хеч ким йўқлиги бу Аллоҳ сени тарк этди дегани эмас.. ➥Линкни босиб "NAMOZ VAQTLARI" каналига обуна бўлинг!👇👇 https://telegram.me/+g4sYzUvaWEowM2Ni
👍3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 595 posts we hold for @Nomoz_Vaqtlari_Kanali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🌙 Бугун улуғ жума кунида Пайғамбаримиз Муҳаммад Соллаллоҳу алайҳи васалламга саловатлар айтишни унутманг! Саловат айтинг ва босинг!
The shares total 851%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 595 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NAMOZ VAQTLARI 🌙” (@Nomoz_Vaqtlari_Kanali), 106,398 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nomoz_Vaqtlari_Kanali.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.