https://x.com/Crypto_Nolt/status/1999180114228052276
🔥17❤5

Channel
@Nolt_Ideas
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
319subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003221920643 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nolt_Ideas |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 6 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nolt_Ideas |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 319 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 321 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 323 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 321 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 322 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 322 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 6 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
59 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 36 | 61.0% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 35.6% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 3.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 11 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://x.com/Crypto_Nolt/status/1999180114228052276
🔥17❤5
Umbrae U1 Lower lows and lower highs Bouncing at Support This is a nice falling wedge meaning a decrease in selling pressure I cant help myself but thinking those levels are a once in a cycle opportunities Imagine buying Meteora or Aerodrome at 250k MC just before their platform launch and their ascension to 250M - 1B MC 1000 to 4000x Those are extremely high hopes i know But it gives a quick opinion on the upside po…
🔥15
I Just had a nice talk with Gowtham Naidu Ponnana The genius Chief Security Officer for Umbrae that I will include in my thread And all I can say for now is that we are in great hands A quick reminder Gowtham works for hashlock Hashlock is ranked #1 Audit company by CoinMarketCap
❤7🔥2
I am preparing a detailed thread and market comparison for Umbrae DLMM Trading platform I took 2 days off today and tomorrow so it might be ready by mid week / end of the week
❤6
Not sure why this isn’t getting a bit more of attention The idea is pretty cool and it’s low cap but well it is what it is I ll hold and see
https://x.com/Crypto_Nolt/status/1997708208643670456
https://x.com/nuev9999/status/1997691963206746378
Bought some Hlock 20k Mc You can shark your private keys amongst multiple people Great idea DnYsEtnZiofE7AzNQsP1nK7UdfmsiYFjnZpDBsopump
❤1
I think umbrae is going to pull some serious serious Xs from here Closest competition is 30x from here Meteora 500x Aerodrome 2000x Ofc the platform is not live yet but with the tech they are showcasing it’s going to go nuts imho And the fact you can be a shareholder by buying one or many of the limited and capped 777 NFTs to get a 30% on the fees is insane as well One nft is 0.5 Eth for now They act as equities T…
❤2
https://x.com/Crypto_Nolt/status/1997574755331793084?s=20
https://x.com/Crypto_Nolt/status/1997444642401345879
🔥1
https://x.com/Crypto_Nolt/status/1997440311165898901?s=20
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Nolt_Ideas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nolt Ideas” (@Nolt_Ideas), 319 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nolt_Ideas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.