Channel
@NodeMation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
107subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001999012755 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NodeMation |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NodeMation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 107 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 108 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 108 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 15 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 41.2% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 35.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2026 to 21 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Now it’s fully changed into an all‑in‑one Airtable manager. • Airtable MCP (+66 Tools solving airtable rest api limitations) • Airtable LSP (types, validation, linter) • Airtable IDE for .fx (formulas), .ata (automations), .ats (scripts) • Airtable daemon + tunnel (One shared server processor for all clients, exposed to the public internet via Cloudflare or ngrok as an MCP) • GUI interface for building custom p…
❤2🔥1
if you are using this current version of n8n shell: https://github.com/Automations-Project/n8n-data-manager 🫠i just want to show you the "Size" of changes coming soon:
❤1
.
❤2
Using Claude Code to manage base views, computed fields (Formulas), and extensions (free + open source, 2000+ users already started using it) 👉 2 days or maximum next weekend i will share perplexity too.
https://github.com/Automations-Project/VSCode-Airtable-Formula
🔥1
right now i am paying $400 to Claude. Max 20x (2× accounts) right now: - Claude Pro = not worth a penny. never use it, instead go with Codex with that budget. - Claude Max 5x = only if you have light work not locked to a timeline. - Claude Max 20x = best for getting work done right now. but the limits have been downgraded by 50%, so if you used it before, you should know it’s half of what it was.
❤2
⚠️Don't upgrade to [email protected] as it contains a critical bug that will cause break the n8n flow when execute items in sub-workflows! https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/issues/28208 if so, downgrade to version [email protected] it's stable.
A few days ago I sent the project to a coworker and gifted him a Claude Code 20x, asking him to continue working on it. He is a real developer, so his improvements add real value. As he claimed in his last message, he was able to improve it to output around 1865 n8n automation nodes. The 100% is based on the problems we had before, mainly around auto-detecting the dynamics of n8n load options and other issues. He pr…
n8n already announced an update replacing this project. Now it officially has the ability to create workflows using native MCP in the instance settings 😐 i will keep continue on mine as it's already made for only complex workflows. https://www.reddit.com/r/n8n/comments/1s6aytd/n8n_214_finally_ships_createupdate_workflow_via/
I did research before working on it. One of the n8n core team already tried to make this project: https://github.com/ivov/nodewriter There are also some people trying to vibecode a similar idea: https://github.com/jongan69/n8n-node-builder (https://n8n-node-builder.vercel.app/)
just made the first usable version of the "Node Builder". this project has used all my CC credits during the last 3 months. sent it to my team, and i’m expecting they can generate nodes with ~15 mins of work until it reaches production. it supports Postman/OpenAPI/Swagger as sources for API docs once this project is stable, i’m expecting we can build ~100 nodes a year at least. and the big part is this project isn…
So now it’s up to 32 tools, and I made an extension dashboard for it just like perplexity. The AI files are the real headache. I have to set up each AI prompt, skill, and rule by hand for every agent. That’s why it’s taking forever. I can’t just leave it vibecoded without testing the prompts. To test them I need to run live projects to make sure everything works. The bright side is I’ve got a bunch of Airtable proj…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @NodeMation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 692,694 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NodeMation By Nskha” (@NodeMation), 107 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NodeMation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.