Sticker, posted without a caption
❤2❤🔥1🔥1
Signed M

Channel
@Nochat_iran
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
10,806subscribers
+45 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001730821303 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nochat_iran |
| Description | ❌No copyright infringement intended❌ If you own the copyrights of any stuff intimate us with proof we will remove it. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nochat_iran |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 10,806 | +9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 10,797 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 10,792 | +5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 10,787 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 10,788 | +14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 10,774 | +21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 10,753 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 10,748 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 10,754 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 10,757 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 10,761 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (8 July 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 32,116 |
| Reactions total | 199 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 23:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
241 reactions across 36 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 131 | 54.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 30 | 12.4% | |
| 🍓 | 15 | 6.22% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 5.81% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 4.98% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 4.15% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 2.49% | |
| 🆒 | 5 | 2.07% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 2.07% | |
| ☃ | 3 | 1.24% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 1.24% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 0.83% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.83% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.83% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.415% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤2❤🔥1🔥1
Signed M
نظر کاربران درباره فیلم « لاک پشت »
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2❤🔥1🔥1
Signed M
🎥 دانلود فیلم « لاک پشت » ( 1404) #لاک #پشت 📤نسخه اورجینال 🔹 ژانر: #درام ، #اجتماعی ⭐ امتیاز IMDb ⏰ مدت زمان : 96 دقیقه 👔 کارگردان : بهمن کامیار ⭐ ستارگان : فرهاد اصلانی، صابر ابر، نازنین بیاتی، نازنین کریمی، هومن برق نورد، آزیتا حاجیان، جمشید گرگین و... 📆 سال انتشار : 1402 🎞 خلاصه داستان: دکتر پیروز ارجمند برای یکشب، میزبان معشوقه سابق همسرش است که در گذشته، عشق پر شوری بین آن دو بوده. او از دیدار مجدد و زنده شدن ع…
❤3❤🔥1🍓1🔥1
Signed M
«خوک» یکی از خاصترین و جسورانهترین کارهای سینمای ایرانه که متأسفانه اونطور که باید و شاید بهش پرداخته نشد و کمتر از حقش دیده شد. این فیلم مثل یک کلاژ هیجانانگیزه؛ ترکیبی عجیب و روون از کمدی سیاه، تراژدی، ترس و هیجان. انگار تو هر سکانس قرار نیست فقط یک حس تکراری رو تجربه کنی؛ یک لحظه داری به موقعیتهای سوررئال و دیوانهوار میخندی و سکانس بعد با یک فضای معماگونه و تلخ شوکه میشی. 🎭 📥 برای دانلود فیلم کلیک کنید 📥…
❤2🤩1
Signed Ala
داستان فیلم در دهه ۱۳۶۰ و همزمان با جنگ ایران و عراق روایت میشود. محور داستان زنی مهربان و فداکار به نام آباجان است که ستون اصلی خانوادهاش محسوب میشود. او تلاش میکند در بحبوحه موشکباران، کمبودها و فشارهای جنگ، خانواده را کنار هم نگه دارد و از عزیزانش محافظت کند. اما با وقوع اتفاقاتی غیرمنتظره، آرامش این خانواده به هم میریزد و آباجان مجبور میشود میان عشق، مسئولیت و فداکاری تصمیمهای سختی بگیرد. فیلم بیش از …
❤3
Signed Ala
شما رو چه حسابی اومدید تو زندگی من؟ 📥 برای دانلود فیلم کلیک کنید 📥 ✈️ - #سکانس 🆔 @Nochat_Iran
❤2
Signed Ala
💡 نکته قابل توجه: «بی داد» یک فیلم مستقل و زیرزمینی است که نخستین نمایش جهانی آن در بخش مسابقه جشنواره بینالمللی فیلم کارلوویواری ۲۰۲۵ انجام شد و جایزه ویژه هیئت داوران را دریافت کرد. این فیلم همچنین در چندین جشنواره بینالمللی از جمله ونکوور، ریو و استانبول به نمایش درآمده است. از حواشی مهم فیلم، تشکیل پرونده قضایی برای کارگردان و برخی عوامل و صدور احکام قضایی برای آنان در ایران بوده است. #بیداد 🆔 @Nochat_Iran
👍1
Signed Ala
۲۶ سال از اکران «دستهای آلوده» میگذرد؛ فیلمی از سیروس الوند که در اواخر دهه هفتاد روی پرده رفت و به یکی از ماندگارترین آثار سینمای ایران تبدیل شد. اما آنچه این فیلم را در ذهن بسیاری جاودانه کرد، فقط داستان و بازیهای درخشانش نبود؛ موسیقی بینظیر بابک بیات و صدای تازهنفس نیما مسیحا نیز سهم بزرگی در ماندگاری آن داشتند. ✈️ - #Edit 🆔 @Nochat_Iran
❤1❤🔥1👌1
Signed Ala
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤3❤🔥3🍓2
Signed Ala
نظر کاربران درباره فیلم « بیداد ۱۴۰۵ »
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤3❤🔥2🍓2
Signed Ala
🎥 دانلود فیلم《 بیداد - بی داد 》(1405) #بیداد 📤نسخه لو رفته 🔹 ژانر: #درام #اجتماعی ⭐ امتیاز IMDb ⏰ مدت زمان : 103 دقیقه 👔 کارگردان : سهیل بیرقی ⭐️ ستارگان : امیرجدیدی،سروین ضابطیان و لیلی رشیدی و ... 📆 سال انتشار : 1403 🎞 خلاصه داستان: فیلم «بیداد» در مورد زن خواننده جوانی است که از پذیرش ممنوعیت صدای زنان در عرصه عمومی سر باز میزند. او تصمیم میگیرد به آوازخوانی خیابانی رو بیاورد. این اقدام اعتراضی او با استقبال ج…
❤6❤🔥2🍓2👍2
Signed Ala
چندوقت پیشا یه شب با شوهرش خیلی عادی شام میخورن ، صحبت میکنن ، فیلم میبینن ، میخوابن بعد صبح که میشه دیگه مائده بیدار نمیشه ... چرا بیدار نمیشه ؟ نمیدونم فقط بیدار نمیشه ... 📥 برای دانلود فیلم کلیک کنید 📥 ✈️ - #سکانس #دوئت 🆔 @Nochat_Iran
❤4🍓1👍1🤩1🆒1
Signed Ala
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @Nochat_iran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
نظر کاربران درباره فیلم « لاک پشت »
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
نظر کاربران درباره فیلم « بیداد ۱۴۰۵ »
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
نظر کاربران درباره فیلم « داره صبح میشه »
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
نظر کاربران درباره فیلم « قرمز یواش »
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
نظر کاربران درباره فیلم « موسی کلیم الله »
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
نظر کاربران درباره فیلم « برای یک زندگی معمولی »
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 449,410 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ɴᴏᴄʜᴀᴛ | سینمایی ایرانی 🇮🇷” (@Nochat_iran), 10,806 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nochat_iran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.