Как то так

Channel
NOSKILLTM❤️
@NoSkillTm
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
21subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003944614554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NoSkillTm |
| Created | 7 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NoSkillTm |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 21 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 22 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 23 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 24 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 25 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 25 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 11s
- Average length
- 4m 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/+DWu8cBtIzv83NTdi
Зовите друзей, даже если и не про рояль просто будем базарить о чем угодно 🙈
Хочу создать активную беседу среди своих
Слушайте, яры, я колю этот свиток под лунным светом, дабы утро его узрело! Вижу, что многие злы, крича о подлоге и о том, будто Тимур выиграл в хитрости, но клянусь головой — всё было честно, как удар топора! Вижу, как люди покидают стан мой, и я лишь радуюсь, ибо они пришли лишь за добычей, а не за верностью. Те, кто остался, скорее всего, истинные олды моего похода, или же ждут новой битвы, и я скажу лишь одно: они…
Результаты конкурса: Победитель: 1. Tymur Проверить результаты
❤5
А как успехи у вас? Присоединяйтесь к обсуждению!
Испа с внезапной смертью это просто трешак, до 5 утра пытался апнуть, максимум 1900, а потом все равно слил🫣🤯
❤1
Апатать абсолюта?
- Да29%
- Возможно18%
- На…уй надо53%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ролики давно не выходили, слегка занят, да и каких то интересных каток не было даже не знаю мб начать снимать просто видосы апп до абсолюта или тип того, но игра уже не приносит такого кайфа как было раньше, поэтому все мои видосы это игры по фану, возможно в новом сезоне уже будет по ярче, но пока так
Всем салам братья на связи NoSkillTm❤️,начинающий тт блогер и ноускильный игрок в ClashRoyale, есть новость: ⚔️ РОЗЫГРЫШ PASS ROYALE ⚔️ Решил подогнать 1 PASS ROYALE для своих. Цель — добить 200 сабов в ТТ и 200 человек в ТГ. Как добиваем — сразу выбираю победителя. Что нужно: — Подписаться на TikTok(ссылка будет в закрепе) — Залететь в Telegram — Кинуть коммент под видео Всё. Без ебанутых условий и спама друзьям.…
На счет видосов, накидайте фоновых колод для нового видео желательно таких что бы было интересно, выкину потом на тт
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @NoSkillTm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Апатать абсолюта?
- Да29%
- Возможно18%
- На…уй надо53%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 7 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
https://www.tiktok.com/@noskilltm?_r=1&_t=ZS-96AwIjlFExt
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NOSKILLTM❤️” (@NoSkillTm), 21 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NoSkillTm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.