Channel
@Nnekct_ontop
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004422225605 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nnekct_ontop |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 5 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nnekct_ontop |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 3 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 2 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 2 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
سلام رفقا بنده اسکایس فستم ی ننه جنده اومد رو اکم این اکو دلیت میزنم و با شماره جدید منو اد کنید تو چنلاتون اونایی که ادم نکنن منم از اد درشون میارم کص ننه سینوسی ننه جنده با تشکر از اونایی که ننه ی سینوسی رو گاییدن @SkyesFast پیام بدین لطفا
🏆🩸🩸🩸🏆 𝐂𝐨𝐰𝐛𝐨𝐲🔢🅰️🅰️🅰️🩶 𝐒𝐚𝐯𝐚𝐤⛑ 𝐀𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐤𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐲 ⛑ 𝐒𝐤𝐲𝐞𝐬𝐅𝐚𝐬𝐭 ⛑ 𝐀𝐦𝐢𝐧 𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐨 😈 𝐏𝐨𝐜𝐨𝐲𝐨 😈 𝐆𝐨𝐝 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐦 ⛑⛑ 🩸🩸🩸 𝐊𝐜𝐭🔞💦🍑 𝐒𝐧𝐒𝐂𝐂 🍑 𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐑𝐘 🥵 𝐙𝐞𝐮𝐬 💦 𝐊𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐦🍑💦🍭 کی سی تی کص ننه به ما نمیخوری مادر جنده ما خداتیم ۳ تا نوک رفت تو ننت رکورد لف دادنت تا امدنت بود ننتو گایدیم کص ننه به ما نمیخوری شاشیدم به قبر ننت گفتم گیرت میارم مادر جنده دیگه نمیبنم با عکس ساختگی برا من بشاخی کص ننه خدات مایم مادر جنده تو ۱ باشی ما منفیم مادر جنده اینط
شاتای نیما کی سی تی 🗡 با یو آیدی و فول مدرک 🗡 24 تا شات و 4 نوک 🗡 https://t.me/aydindbjs/2089?single https://t.me/aydindbjs/2064?single https://t.me/aydindbjs/2099?single
اینم اکانت من نیما مادر خودتو بخاطر شات من گاییدی خودتو فیک زن کردی و سیکت خورد پسرم از کامینیوتی تا یاد بگیری با هرکسی در بیفتی با من نمیتونی کل کل کنی آیدین سامورایی افسانه ای مادر جنده من خداتم 🤩 🌟
⭕️ ⭕️ ⭕️ ⭕️ ⭕️ ⭕️ ⭕️ ⭕️ ⭕️ ⭕️ ⭕️ ⭕️ ⭕️ ⭕️ مدرک فیک زنی نیما کی سی تی همین اکانته هست روش فیک منو زدن رفته اسم اکانت منو کپی کرده زده روی این اکانت رفته نوک زده روش تو کلن خودشون هم هست طرف آک خودشه فکر کنم یا رفیقاش اومده ریکورد اینا کرده پروف خودمم گذاشته پروفی که من تو کالاف میزارم همه دارن از این ساده ها هست مادرت زنا شد پسرم کصناموص فیک زن ننت رفت زیر کیر 1000000000 نفر 🤣 با این مدرک تمامی شات های نیما کی س…
🅰️🅰️🅰️ OSTAD SAMORAI 3NUK 🖤 MOHSEN STAROS 🖤 🅰️🅰️🅰️ NIMA KCT 🌼 کصمادرت دیگع نبینم شات فیک بزاری پسرم ننتو یه جوری میگام مامانت هرروز بیفته به پریود شدن کصناموص ولد کون تازه به دوران رسیده ننه سبزی فروش مادرت گاییده شد دیگه بهت نمیپردازم 40 تا شات 4 نوک پروندت بسته شد 🗡 🩶
🤩🤩🤩 SAMORAI BOZORG 🇵🇸 MOHSEN STAROS 🇵🇸 🤩🤩🤩 NIMA KCT 🍑 کیرم رفت تو عزیز ترین کسای زندیگت مرده گوه ننه کیر دزد آیدین سامورایی افسانه ای پسر ناموصت کفن شد کیرم تو سنگ قبر مرده هات که زیر دو متر خاک دفن شدن میشاشم تو قبر مرده هات مرده هات بوی شاش بگیره 😂
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Nnekct_ontop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nne kct” (@Nnekct_ontop), 3 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nnekct_ontop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.