Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 9xWin Official

Channel

9xWin Official

@NinexWin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

600subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001430352991
TypeChannel
Username@NinexWin
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 22 June 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NinexWin

Growth

60060860413 August 2026 — 608 subscribers14 August 2026 — 608 subscribers21 August 2026 — 607 subscribers29 August 2026 — 604 subscribers6 September 2026 — 600 subscribers13 August 20266 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 24 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 599–609 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 07:17600-4
29 Aug 2026, 07:42604-3
21 Aug 2026, 17:18607-1
14 Aug 2026, 15:58608no change
13 Aug 2026, 16:47608first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 June 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2021, 07:59 UTC≈5,250 viewsread 13 August 2026

::: /-..-\ ::: 9xWin AI Period: 1619 Game: Blaze AI Suggest: Red Results based on previous trends and data analysis. AI prediction is not 100% sure. Follow or not, its depend on you!.

22 Jun 2021, 07:58 UTC≈5,180 viewsread 13 August 2026

::: /-..-\ ::: 9xWin AI Period: 1618 Game: Blaze AI Suggest: Green Results based on previous trends and data analysis. AI prediction is not 100% sure. Follow or not, its depend on you!.

22 Jun 2021, 07:58 UTC≈4,360 viewsread 13 August 2026

::: /-..-\ ::: 9xWin AI Period: 1617 Game: Blaze AI Suggest: Red Results based on previous trends and data analysis. AI prediction is not 100% sure. Follow or not, its depend on you!.

22 Jun 2021, 07:57 UTC≈3,690 viewsread 13 August 2026

::: /-..-\ ::: 9xWin AI Period: 1616 Game: Blaze AI Suggest: Green Results based on previous trends and data analysis. AI prediction is not 100% sure. Follow or not, its depend on you!.

22 Jun 2021, 07:57 UTC≈3,250 viewsread 13 August 2026

::: /-..-\ ::: 9xWin AI Period: 1615 Game: Blaze AI Suggest: Red Results based on previous trends and data analysis. AI prediction is not 100% sure. Follow or not, its depend on you!.

22 Jun 2021, 07:56 UTC≈3,030 viewsread 13 August 2026

::: /-..-\ ::: 9xWin AI Period: 1614 Game: Blaze AI Suggest: Green Results based on previous trends and data analysis. AI prediction is not 100% sure. Follow or not, its depend on you!.

22 Jun 2021, 07:56 UTC≈2,790 viewsread 13 August 2026

::: /-..-\ ::: 9xWin AI Period: 1613 Game: Blaze AI Suggest: Red Results based on previous trends and data analysis. AI prediction is not 100% sure. Follow or not, its depend on you!.

22 Jun 2021, 07:55 UTC≈2,670 viewsread 13 August 2026

::: /-..-\ ::: 9xWin AI Period: 1612 Game: Blaze AI Suggest: Red Results based on previous trends and data analysis. AI prediction is not 100% sure. Follow or not, its depend on you!.

22 Jun 2021, 07:55 UTC≈2,520 viewsread 13 August 2026

::: /-..-\ ::: 9xWin AI Period: 1611 Game: Blaze AI Suggest: Red Results based on previous trends and data analysis. AI prediction is not 100% sure. Follow or not, its depend on you!.

22 Jun 2021, 07:54 UTC≈2,400 viewsread 13 August 2026

::: /-..-\ ::: 9xWin AI Period: 1610 Game: Blaze AI Suggest: Green Results based on previous trends and data analysis. AI prediction is not 100% sure. Follow or not, its depend on you!.

22 Jun 2021, 07:54 UTC≈2,310 viewsread 13 August 2026

::: /-..-\ ::: 9xWin AI Period: 1609 Game: Blaze AI Suggest: Green Results based on previous trends and data analysis. AI prediction is not 100% sure. Follow or not, its depend on you!.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NinexWin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“9xWin Official” (@NinexWin), 600 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NinexWin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.