Channel
@Nikolaika_Gogol
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
60subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003149964290 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nikolaika_Gogol |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nikolaika_Gogol |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 21:48 | 60 | +2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:40 | 58 | +5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:40 | 53 | +1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:08 | 52 | -1 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 10:57 | 53 | -2 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 55 | +9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 46 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:47 | 46 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 3 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
57 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 21 | 36.8% | |
| 🤡 | 11 | 19.3% | |
| 👾 | 5 | 8.77% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 8.77% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 8.77% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 5.26% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 5.26% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.75% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Успели несколько серий Тетради смерти посмотреть (на удивление, предложил не я!), сгонять в магаз, да и просто наобщаться на неделю вперёд. Хыых. А ещё меня научили браслеты плести из резиночек! Я один яркий такой сплел, иии... Брелок, похожий на олений пенис. Изначально не так задумывалось :_) Ну, подо что плели, то и получилось. Вы замечали, что "Yagami" наоборот это "im a gay"?~ ︎ …
🔥3👾1
Хах, впервые кто-то клоуна поставил 🤡
🤡5🥰5👾1
Ещё целый час на сборы
🔥2
О, седня ко второму
🤡6🔥3
К двоюродным брату и сестре ездил с ночёвкой :) Чёт долго с мыслями собраться не мог, чтобы начать писать. Продолжение следует, а пока скину фото, а то иначе даже этот пост забуду выложить. ︎ —⊲︎•⊳︎—
🔥2
Ни одного верного предположения!!! Даже не близко :(
😁1
Кто угадает, куда я уехал на ночь глядя?~ ︎ —⊲︎•⊳︎—
🔥1
Я их задолбал самую малость. Обоих.
🔥2
Дни тянутся за днями, а мы всё сидим в этой школе... Но есть в этом и плюсы! С началом учебы у меня раз в сто вдохновения прибавилось – видимо, любые резкие перемены, будь то долгожданный отдых или внезапная нагрузка, не дают мыслям застаиваться. Времени не всегда хватает, а вот идей хоть отбавляй!!! Что думаете о том, чтобы устроить какой-нибудь движ в школе?~ Даже не столько самих идей, сколько энерг…
🎉3🔥2🕊2🍓1👾1
Этот вопрос прилетел мне ровно в тот момент, когда я уже подумывал напомнить про наличие у меня анонимки :| ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎—⊲︎•⊳︎—
🔥4✍2💘1
Кто тебе больше нравится: Ацуши или Огури? У меня какое-то странное чувство, словно я знаю автора данного вопроса... Полагаю, оба? Между хорошими друзьями (которые этими двумя не ограничиваются) не выбирают! Единственное что может несколько разниться – моё отношение к ним. С Огури мы знакомы не первый год, и с этим огурцом мы знаем друг друга как свои пять пальцев. Кошак же новенький в нашем классе. Я…
🕊3💘2🔥1
Мне не дали фото сделать, но, короче говоря, я уронил стакан (он в прихожей на тумбе стоял), при чём тот самый, из Мака, и осколки по всему коридору рассыпались... Иду за ваткой, буду собирать. ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎—⊲︎•⊳︎—
👾2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Nikolaika_Gogol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“°⧫︎•⊲︎Коля Гогля⊳︎•︎︎◊︎°” (@Nikolaika_Gogol), 60 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nikolaika_Gogol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.