Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐ŸŒนแŠ’แ‰ƒแ‰ขแˆตแ‰ท แŠ•แŒแˆตแ‰ต๐Ÿ‘‘ ๐ŸŒนู†ุญู† ุงู„ุณู„ููŠูŠู†

Channel

๐ŸŒนแŠ’แ‰ƒแ‰ขแˆตแ‰ท แŠ•แŒแˆตแ‰ต๐Ÿ‘‘ ๐ŸŒนู†ุญู† ุงู„ุณู„ููŠูŠู†

@Nikabistuwanigist

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts recorded as deleted ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

6,268subscribers

+123 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002385583455
TypeChannel
Username@Nikabistuwanigist
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nikabistuwanigist

Topic

Religion โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,0696,3156,1927 August 2026 โ€” 6,145 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 6,145 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 6,144 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 6,132 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 6,119 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 6,095 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 6,101 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 6,080 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 6,069 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 6,086 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 6,092 subscribers6 September 2026 โ€” 6,084 subscribers11 September 2026 โ€” 6,088 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 6,092 subscribers19 September 2026 โ€” 6,127 subscribers30 September 2026 โ€” 6,287 subscribers6 October 2026 โ€” 6,315 subscribers13 October 2026 โ€” 6,293 subscribers15 October 2026 โ€” 6,263 subscribers19 October 2026 โ€” 6,269 subscribers22 October 2026 โ€” 6,261 subscribers25 October 2026 โ€” 6,245 subscribers31 October 2026 โ€” 6,226 subscribers3 November 2026 โ€” 6,206 subscribers7 November 2026 โ€” 6,268 subscribers6,2687 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net +123. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 6,032โ€“6,352 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 07:176,268+62
3 Nov 2026, 23:096,206-20
31 Oct 2026, 22:166,226-19
25 Oct 2026, 20:446,245-16
22 Oct 2026, 16:596,261-8
19 Oct 2026, 05:306,269+6
15 Oct 2026, 23:556,263-30
13 Oct 2026, 00:366,293-22
6 Oct 2026, 16:156,315+28
30 Sept 2026, 02:396,287+160
19 Sept 2026, 15:366,127+35
15 Sept 2026, 02:176,092+4
11 Sept 2026, 04:566,088+4
6 Sept 2026, 17:416,084-8
2 Sept 2026, 08:546,092+6
29 Aug 2026, 22:346,086+17
26 Aug 2026, 13:536,069-11
23 Aug 2026, 22:356,080-21
20 Aug 2026, 07:356,101+6
17 Aug 2026, 16:276,095first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
20.5%
avg views รท 6,268 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,280
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held50 (25 July 2026 โ€“ 6 November 2026)
Views total28,204
Reactions total539
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 41s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

1,488 reactions across 47 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ‘95964.4%
๐Ÿ’ฏ18112.2%
โค1429.54%
๐Ÿ‘Œ744.97%
๐Ÿ˜ข473.16%
๐Ÿ˜ญ151.01%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ100.672%
๐Ÿ“100.672%
๐ŸŽ‰90.605%
๐Ÿ’”90.605%
๐Ÿคฃ90.605%
๐Ÿ•Š50.336%
๐Ÿฅฐ40.269%
๐Ÿ™Š30.202%
๐Ÿ‘20.134%
๐Ÿ’Š20.134%
๐Ÿ˜20.134%
๐Ÿคฉ20.134%
โœ10.067%
๐Ÿ™‰10.067%
1 further kind10.067%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 1,488 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegramโ€™s own โ€˜editedโ€™ marker: 9 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (39.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC119 views0 reactionsread 6 November 2026

๐Ÿ’ซ๐Ÿ’ซ๐Ÿ’ซ๐Ÿ’ซ๐Ÿ’ซ๐Ÿ’ซ๐Ÿ’ซ๐Ÿ’ซ๐Ÿ’ซ๐Ÿ’ซ๐Ÿ’ซ ๐ŸŒฑ๐ŸŒฑ๐ŸŒฑ๐ŸŒฑ๐ŸŒฑ๐ŸŒฑ๐ŸŒฑ แˆ‚แ‹ˆแ‰ต แ‹ซแˆˆ ------------ แ‰ฃแ‹ถ แАแ‹‰ แŠญแแ‰ฑแŠ• แ‰ฆแ‰ณ แˆ™แˆ‰แ‰ต แŠฅแˆตแ‰ฒ แŠฅแŠ” แ‹ซแˆˆ แ‹ฒแŠ• แ‹ซแˆˆ แˆฐแˆˆแแ‹ซ t.me//nikabistuwanigist

Signed Zakir

6 Nov 2026, 11:48 UTC397 views15 reactionsread 6 November 2026

แ‹›แˆฌ แ‹จแ‰ฐแˆฐแ‰ แˆจแ‹‰ แАแŒˆแˆญแˆ… แАแŒˆ แ‰  แŠ แˆ‹แˆ… แˆแ‰ƒแ‹ต แŠจแˆแ‰ณแˆตแ‰ แ‹‰ แ‰ แˆ‹แ‹ญ แŠ แˆแˆฎ แ‹ญแŒˆแАแ‰ฃแˆ แ‰ฐแˆตแ‹. แŠ แ‰ตแ‰แˆจแŒฅ t.me//nikabistuwanigist

๐Ÿ’ฏ9๐Ÿ‘6

Signed Zakir

5 Nov 2026, 20:16 UTC720 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026

แАแŒˆ แŒ…แˆ™แŠ  แАแ‹‰ แŠฅแŠ“ แАแ‰ƒ แ‰ แˆ‰

๐Ÿ‘25

Signed Zakir

5 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC790 views40 reactionsread 6 November 2026

แ‹˜แˆแŠ• แ‹จ แˆแ‰ตแˆฐแˆ› แ‰€แˆแ‰ฅ แŠฅแŠ“ แŒ†แˆฎ แˆแŠ•แŠ› แ‹จแŠจแˆฐแˆฉ แŠ“แ‰ธแ‹‰............ แ‰แˆญแŠฃแŠ• แˆแ‰ตแˆฐแˆ›แ‹‹ แ‰€แˆแ‰ฅ แŠฅแŠ“ แŒ†แˆฎ แˆแŠ•แŠ› แ‹ฐแˆตแ‰ฐแŠ› แ‹ซแˆ›แˆจแ‰ฝ แ‹จแ‰ณแ‹ฐแˆˆแ‰ฝ แŠ“แ‰ต .. t.me//nikabistuwanigist

๐Ÿ’ฏ23โค8๐Ÿ‘6๐Ÿ˜ญ3

Signed Zakir

5 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC988 views36 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ‘‘ แ‹จแˆดแ‰ตแАแ‰ต แŠญแ‰ฅแˆญโ€ฆ๐Ÿ‘‘ แˆดแ‰ตแАแ‰ต แ‹แ‰ แ‰ต แ‰ฅแ‰ป แŠ แ‹ญแ‹ฐแˆˆแˆ แˆ€แ‹ซแŠฅ แАแ‹แฃ แŠญแ‰ฅแˆญ แАแ‹ แ‰ตแˆ…แ‰ตแŠ“ แАแ‹แข แŠฅแ‹แАแ‰ฐแŠ› แˆดแ‰ต แ‹‹แŒ‹แ‹‹แŠ• แˆˆแˆ›แˆณแ‹จแ‰ต แ‹ตแˆแŒฟแŠ• แŠ แ‰ณแˆฐแˆ›แˆ แ‰ แŠ แŠญแˆ‹แ‰‹ แ‰ตแŠ“แŒˆแˆซแˆˆแ‰ฝ แ‰ แŠ แˆˆแ‰ฃแ‰ แˆท แˆแŠจแŠแАแ‰ทแŠ• แ‰ แŠ•แŒแŒแˆฏ แŒฅแ‰ แ‰งแŠ• แ‰ แˆแ‰ง แŠ•แŒฝแˆ…แŠ“แ‹‹แŠ• แ‰ณแˆณแ‹ซแˆˆแ‰ฝแข แˆดแ‰ต แˆ›แˆˆแ‰ต แ‰ แˆฐแ‹Žแ‰ฝ แ‹˜แŠ•แ‹ต แ‰ฅแ‰ป แŠญแ‰ฅแˆญ แ‹ซแˆ‹แ‰ต แˆณแ‰ตแˆ†แŠ• แ‰ แŠ แˆ‹แˆ… แ‹˜แŠ•แ‹ต แ‹จแ‰ฐแŠจแ‰ แˆจแ‰ฝ แˆˆแˆ˜แˆ†แŠ• แ‹จแˆแ‰ตแŒฅแˆญ แŠ“แ‰ตแข แˆ€แ‹ซแŠฅแ‹‹ แ‹˜แ‹แ‹ท แŠขแˆ›แŠ— แŒŒแŒง แŠ แŠญแˆ‹แ‰‹ แˆ˜แˆˆแ‹ซแ‹‹ แАแ‹แข๐Ÿ‘‘ @Nikabistuwanigist @Nikabistuwanigist

๐Ÿ‘Œ16๐Ÿ’ฏ10๐Ÿ‘6โค4

Signed ๐ŸŒทุงู„ุณูŽู‘ู„ูŽูููŠูŽู‘ุฉู ู…ูŽู†ู’ู‡ูŽุฌููŠ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

5 Nov 2026, 10:26 UTCโ‰ˆ1,370 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

แŒ‰แ‹ต แАแ‹‰ แŠ แˆ‰ แŠ แˆ‹แˆ… แŠจ แŒฆแˆณแ‹‰ แˆ™แˆตแŒ แ‹ แ‹ญแŒ แ‰ฅแ‰€แŠ• แˆˆแˆฑแˆ แ‰€แˆแ‰ฅ แ‹ญแˆตแŒ แ‹‰ แŠ แˆแŠ• แŠฅแˆฑ แŠ แАแ‹š แˆ˜แˆปแ‹ญแŠฎแ‰ฝ แ‰ แˆแŒฃแˆแ‹‰ แˆŠแˆ แАแ‹‰ แŠจ แŠกแˆฐแ‹ญแˆšแŠ• แŠจ แˆแ‹‰แ‹›แŠ• แŠจ แŠ แˆแ‰ฃแŠ’ แŠจแŠขแ‰ฅแŠ‘ แ‰ฃแ‹ t.me//nikabistuwanigist

๐Ÿ˜ญ7โค3๐Ÿ˜ข3๐Ÿ’”1

Signed Zakir

5 Nov 2026, 09:14 UTCโ‰ˆ1,060 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

แ‹ซ แˆตแˆ‹แˆ t.me//nikabistuwanigist

๐Ÿ‘7โค1๐ŸŽ‰1

Signed Zakir

4 Nov 2026, 20:22 UTCโ‰ˆ1,160 views34 reactionsread 6 November 2026

แ‰ฃแˆแŠ• แŒแ‹œ แ‰  แˆถแˆปแˆ แˆšแ‹ฒแ‹ซ แˆดแ‰ถแŠ แŠ• แ‰ฅแ‰ป แŒฅแ‹แ‰ฐแŠ› แŠฅแŠ“แˆจแŒ‹แˆˆแŠ• แˆˆแˆแŠ•? แ‹‰แŠ•แ‹ตแˆ แŠ แ‹ฐแ‰ฅ แ‰ขแ‹ แ‹แˆ™แ‰ตแŠ• แ‰ขแˆญแ‰… แŠฅแˆถแˆ แ‰ฃแˆแ‰ฐแ‰ แˆ‹แˆฝแ‰ฝ แАแ‰ แˆญ แ‰ฐแˆณแˆณแ‰ตแŠฉ ??

๐Ÿ‘Œ30๐Ÿ‘4

Signed Zakir

4 Nov 2026, 19:58 UTCโ‰ˆ1,190 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026

แŒ‰แ‹ต แŠฅแŠซ แАแ‹‰ แŠ แˆ‰ แˆธแ‹ญแŠญ แ‹›แˆฌ แ‹›แˆฌ แ‹จ แˆดแ‰ถแ‰ฝ แˆ˜แˆ…แˆญ แ‹ˆแ‹ดแ‰ต แŠฅแ‹จแˆ„แ‹ฐ แАแ‹‰ แˆดแ‰ถแ‰ฝ ?? แŠ แˆจแŒ‹แŒ‰แ‰ต แŠฅแŠ•แŒ‚ แАแ‰ฅแ‹ฎ แˆแŠ• แŠ แˆ‰ แˆ˜แˆตแˆ‹แ‰น แ‰ตแ‹ณแˆฉ แ‹ซแˆ˜แˆจแ‹‰ แˆ˜แˆ…แˆฉ แ‰€แˆˆแˆ แ‹ซแˆˆแ‹‰ แАแ‹‰ แ‰ฅแˆˆแ‹‹:: แŠ แŠ•แ‰บแˆต แˆ˜แˆ…แˆญแˆฝ แˆแŠ•แ‹ตแАแ‹‰ ???

๐Ÿ‘17

Signed Zakir

4 Nov 2026, 19:18 UTCโ‰ˆ1,250 views40 reactionsread 6 November 2026

แ‹ตแˆฎ แ‹ตแˆฎ แŠฅแŠ•แˆตแˆณ แˆแŠ•แˆฝแŒฅ แˆตแŠ•แˆ แАแ‰ แˆญ แˆฐแ‹‰แАแ‰ฑแŠ• แ‰ แ‹ฐแŠ• แˆแŠ“แˆณแ‹จแ‹‰ แˆˆแŒˆแ‹ขแ‹‰ แ‹›แˆฌ แŒแŠ• แˆดแ‰ถแ‰ฝ แŠ“แ‰ธแ‹‰ แŠฅแŠ•แ‹ฐแˆšแˆฝแŒฅ แ‰ แˆฌ แ‰  แˆถแˆปแˆ แˆšแ‹ฒแ‹ซ แŽแ‰ถแ‹‹แŠ• แˆแ‰ตแˆˆแŒฅแˆแ‹‰ แˆแŠ• แ‰ตแˆ‹แˆ‹แ‰น แˆแŠญ แАแ‹‰?? @Nikabistuwanigist @Nikabistuwanigist

๐Ÿ‘28๐Ÿคฃ9๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿ‘1

Signed Zakir

4 Nov 2026, 18:02 UTCโ‰ˆ1,240 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026

แŠฅแˆตแ‰ฒ แŠจ แŠ แˆ‹แˆ… แŠฅแŠ•แ‹ตแ‰ตแˆญแ‰…/แŠฅแŠ•แ‹ตแ‰ตแˆญแ‰‚ แ‹ซแ‹ฐแˆจแŒ‹แ‰ฝแˆ แˆแŠญแŠ•แ‹ซแ‰ต แˆแŠ•แ‹ตแАแ‹???

๐Ÿ˜ญ5๐Ÿ‘Œ2

Signed Zakir

4 Nov 2026, 13:44 UTCโ‰ˆ1,340 views105 reactionsread 6 November 2026

แ‹จแ•แˆฎแ‹แ‹ญแˆ แˆตแˆซ แˆแŒ€แˆแˆญ แˆ€แˆณแ‰ฅ แˆตแŒกแŠ แŠฅแˆตแŠช แ‰ แˆ‹แ‹ญแŠญ ๐Ÿ‘60 แˆ‹แ‹ญแŠญ แŠจแŒˆแ‰ฃ แŠฅแŒ€แˆแˆซแˆˆแˆ แŠ แˆˆแŠ• แŠฅแŠ“แ‰ แˆจแ‰ณแ‰ณแˆปแˆˆแŠ• แ‰ แˆ‰แŠ แ‹จแŠ” แ‰…แˆ˜แˆžแ‰ฝ๐ŸŒท

๐Ÿ‘101๐Ÿ™Š3๐Ÿ™‰1

Signed ๐ŸŒทุงู„ุณูŽู‘ู„ูŽูููŠูŽู‘ุฉู ู…ูŽู†ู’ู‡ูŽุฌููŠ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @Nikabistuwanigist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @Nikabistuwanigist as deleted โ€” posts this register held that were missing from the channelโ€™s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโ€™s public page, and when โ€” not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
19 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐ŸŒนแŠ’แ‰ƒแ‰ขแˆตแ‰ท แŠ•แŒแˆตแ‰ต๐Ÿ‘‘ ๐ŸŒนู†ุญู† ุงู„ุณู„ููŠูŠู†โ€ (@Nikabistuwanigist), 6,268 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nikabistuwanigist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.