Когда даёшь кому-то права админа, обязательно нужно познакомить его со всеми уже имеющимися😂😂😂 Из архива "Истории Софи и Ники".
🤣3

Channel
@Nika_Ritheu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002479894417 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nika_Ritheu |
| Description | Добро пожаловать в магический мир моих книг. Я начинающий автор. Пришла рассказать о себе и своëм творчестве. Автор цикла «Иной мир». Не забудьте подписаться 💜 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nika_Ritheu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 42 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 42 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (3 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 304 |
| Reactions total | 137 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
137 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 44 | 32.1% | |
| custom 5377340174608918708 | 21 | 15.3% | |
| custom 5377795827689348600 | 20 | 14.6% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 14.6% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 10.9% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 4.38% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 3.65% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.46% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.46% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.73% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.73% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Когда даёшь кому-то права админа, обязательно нужно познакомить его со всеми уже имеющимися😂😂😂 Из архива "Истории Софи и Ники".
🤣3
Бывало
❤🔥3
Ещё как бывало😂
😁2
➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰ Сегодня бережём… себя😄 Вы очень сильные и заботливые, потому что стараетесь уделять близким людям много внимания и дарить больше любви! А теперь пришло время позаботиться об одном интересном человечке, который постоянно ходит рядом, слышит каждую мысль, очень нуждается в вас… и это вы сами! :3 Не забывайте делать себе маленькие подарки, напоминать, какие вы умнички, что добьётесь больших успехов, а круго…
❤3❤🔥3
🐱Я такой гений, совсем недавно узнала, что книга, по которой снят Золотой компас - начало трилогии. Фильм мне очень понравился, поэтому хочу прочитать книжки. 🎓 🧿Ищу ищу. И знаете что нашла? Северное сияние (1 книга) за 14 тыс... А без скидки она стоит 22... Мне интересно, кто-то такое реально берёт? Даже когда рядом в десять раз дешевле? 📚Я нашла все три части по нормальным ценам. Но прежде чем заказывать я жду, п…
custom 53777958276893486006🔥3❤🔥2custom 53773401746089187082
🔮Встретились как-то двое сдающих биологию - Софи и Ника. Ботаника моя слабость 🥲
❤🔥5custom 53773401746089187081custom 53777958276893486001
🔮Мне кажется, больше половины всех шедеврокомментариев касаются Дениса и Тимура😂 Наверное, эти двое просто шедевроперсонажи😁 ✨Я вам клянусь, я сделаю из менее бесячими. 🙏 #иной_мир #всëбываетвпервые #комментарии_искусство
❤🔥5custom 53773401746089187083custom 53777958276893486003🔥2
🔮А я кажется рога рисовать научилась... ✨ 💜Дальний рог получился кривовато, потому что я сначала ступила с расположением пластин. А так мне даже нравится... ✨ ✨Часть обложки к Крови. ✨ #артыотрытхэу #мортан #кровьпервых
🔥7custom 53773401746089187082❤🔥1custom 53777958276893486001
🔮14. Страна духов: часть 3 ✨Вот и подошло к концу путешествие Ники по Элдервуду. С уверенностью заявляю, что она набралась впечатлений на год вперёд. И не только хороших😔 🔠Если бы она знала, что это только-только начало. И уже совсем скоро она познакомится с тем, кого боялась🐱 🌸А пока что никины итоги путешествия: 🎓Чуть не искупалась в ледяном озере. 🎓Чуть не сгорела вместе со всей группой. 🎓Её чуть не поймали пр…
❤🔥6🔥2😍2custom 53773401746089187082custom 53777958276893486001
🔮13. Страна духов: часть 2 💜Ну а чтобы сегодня не только грустить, вот вам новая глава. Ника продолжает путешествовать по Элдервуду. И у неё тоже не всё гладко. ✨ 🧳Антагонист снова испортил Никусе экскурсию. И следующая глава для неё начнётся не так, как ей хочется🥲 #главы_Рытхэу #иной_мир #королевадняиночи
❤🔥7❤1custom 53773401746089187081custom 53777958276893486001
🔮Я долго не могла решиться, рассказать или нет. Но, думаю, имею право иногда рассказывать о своей жизни в своём канале. ✂️ 🌜Я уверена, каждый из нас хоть раз слышал, что стресс опасен для здоровья. Что от него все болезни. Но, как это обычно бывает, я никогда не думала, что мне самой придётся столкнуться с таким. ✨ 📌Немного предыстории. Десятый класс выдался невероятно стрессовым. Новый класс, новые люди. Гигантски…
❤7❤🔥2custom 53773401746089187082custom 53777958276893486002😢1
🖤🖤🖤Тьма не может 🖤🖤🖤 изгнать тьму. 🖤🖤🖤 Это может сделать только свет. 🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤иной мир
❤🔥7custom 53773401746089187083custom 53777958276893486002
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Nika_Ritheu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 590,650 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔮 Легенды иных миров🔮” (@Nika_Ritheu), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nika_Ritheu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.