Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BB真实好评

Channel

BB真实好评

@Ngzshp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

36subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003212606159
TypeChannel
Username@Ngzshp
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 23 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ngzshp

Growth

3436357 August 2026 — 34 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34 subscribers15 August 2026 — 36 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34–36 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:2836+2
11 Aug 2026, 00:1534no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:4234first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
340.3%
avg views ÷ 36 subscribers
Avg views / post
123
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 December 20259 August 2026)
Views total735
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 05:20 UTC67 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

羊城晚报报告模板 【出击报告】(https://t.me/yangchengEveningnew ) 【位置坐标】 #广州 #(xx区) 【优势】身材S 【劣势】 【妹子花名】:#BB 【联系方式】:@bbxx152 【妹子年龄】:目测20 【验证留名】:Ng 【验证时间】:8.8 【修车水费】:2500pp 【颜值】: 颜值评分: 15分(满分15分) 【身材】: 身材评分: 15分(满分15分) 【服务态度】: 服务评分: 15分( 满分15分) 【情绪价值】:爱答不理/正常交流/沟通愉快 情绪评分: 15分 (满分15分) 【时间管理】:课位/课时安排是否合理 时间评分: 15分 (满分10分) 【同价位合理性】:不符合价位/符合价位/超出价位 价位评分: 15分 (满分10分) 【卫生环境】:事前事有无清洗,课室干净整洁方便停车 环境评分: 15分(满分10分) 【额外加分项

1

3 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC181 viewsread 11 August 2026

沪杭91公馆报告 https://t.me/jiuyigongguann 必填项: 【妹子花名】:#bb 【联系方式】:@bbxx152 【验证留名】:Steven 【验证时间】:8月3日 【修车水费】:1500p 【流程小文】:广深来的老师服务确实是到位!提前半小时提醒点外卖准备喝的。频道非本人不过本人也很漂亮,脸好小。 沙发休息了会进入全自动洗刷刷,胸大概C手感很好皮肤贼好贼光滑,右后肩有个小小的纹身,据说是海鸥,下面是英文名一长条,看不清那就必然就是Steven无疑了,🐔冻。老师很细致,前面洗完洗后面,前面磨磨后面磨磨,妙妙不可言!一边水中萧一边媚眼如丝地看着你,居高临下看脸更小精致了还好我有阿弥陀佛大法,坚持不到床上可太丢人了。 洗完老师换好qqny,光顾着看腿了,小脚加黑丝美腿美滋滋,口活花样贼多,吸吸舔舔快速吞吐真是让人欲罢不能。女上起手老师抓着手不放,边动边挨个舔吸手指主动抓着让你掐脖子,抖抖抖抖抖MⓂ️。女上顶

3 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC142 viewsread 11 August 2026

沪杭91公馆报告 https://t.me/jiuyigongguann 必填项: 【妹子花名】:#BB 【联系方式】:@bbxx152 【验证留名】:M 【验证时间】:8月3日 【修车水费】:1500p(-200优惠) 【流程小文】: 总体评价:超级好评,纳入复刷名单 初见: 提前2天约的宝宝,周末就开始闲聊预热了,宝宝真的无敌好,很健谈,深夜emo的时候还给我唱歌听。期盼了2天终于见到宝宝真人。房间里放着歌,像下班回家的感觉。因为有了前两天的预热。跟宝宝感觉不是初识,像女友,又像邻家姐姐。 宝宝穿着一身包臀长裙,漂亮,没有do过的痕迹,是我喜欢的标准瓜子脸。身材比例极佳,前凸后翘,穿着长裙都能看得出的细腰长腿。引我入座后搂住纤腰,腰侧柔弱无骨,环保过去摸到了心仪的马甲线(我可太爱马甲线了)。宝宝说“后面不急吧,我喜欢慢慢来” 我可太爱慢慢来了(非常讨厌sop)。我们在沙发上聊天、拥抱、拥吻,亲琢到挑逗开宝宝的小嘴热吻。

1 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC121 viewsread 11 August 2026

沪杭91公馆报告 https://t.me/jiuyigongguann 必填项: 【妹子花名】:#bb 奶糕 【联系方式】:@bbxx152 【验证留名】:骏歌 【验证时间】:7月29日 【修车水费】:1300P(优惠券) 【流程小文】:听闻南方名师到杭,怎能错过绝佳机会。 硬件:身高162左右,胸B到C,翘臀,腰腹无赘肉,腰臀比例佳,身材可参照频道黑丝吊裆袜那张.. 服务:约好时间后,当天老师还很贴心的问我喝什么,这样的体验从未有过的...来到课室,奶糕老师一身休闲装,灰色背心+牛仔裤,非常帅气,从冰箱里拿出提前准备好的饮料,喝了一口,嗯...姜黄味儿有点辣口,不过能接受,简单聊几句就去洗澡了。奶糕帮洗的很认真,前后、小弟弟都仔细洗了一遍,全程不用动手。来到房间,奶糕换上了一套qqny,边换边说:哎呀,在你面前换不太好呀,没有变装的惊喜了。换完衣服还出去把高跟鞋穿上(要整就整全套的说,虽然在床上也不穿)。

1 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC100 viewsread 11 August 2026

沪杭91公馆报告 https://t.me/jiuyigongguann 必填项: 【妹子花名】:#奶糕BB 【联系方式】:@bbxx152 【验证留名】:光辉曾 【验证时间】:7月 【修车水费】:1300p(-200兑换券) 【流程小文】: 颜值偏御姐类型点,眼睛很有魅力,对视的时候会有魅人的感觉,妹子自己有健身,身材很OK,腰臀比完全戳中我的店,胸有B起步,乳晕小小的,情绪价值从约课开始就拉满。抱抱贴贴才有循序渐进的感觉。 聊天小憩一下,洗澡属于妹子全自动,我就差躺着了,水中萧吸力满满~出浴被妹子牵着到房间,妹子自己跑去小房间换战袍,刚好坐床上可以看到妹子换衣服的侧影,倒是以前从来没有过的视觉感官。进入正题,妹子跨坐在我大腿上,媚眼看着我,冷不防的直接开启嗦手指模式,这就直接被吸得立马想给妹子扑倒的状态了,过程就是正常的换了几个姿势~~妹子的身体反应是真的舒服,能让你不想停,不想结束!妹子有个事后萧

29 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC124 viewsread 11 August 2026

沪杭91公馆报告 https://t.me/jiuyigongguann 必填项: 【妹子花名】:#奶糕 【联系方式】:@bbxx152 【验证留名】:#火热弟弟 【验证时间】:7月29日 【修车水费】:1500p(工兵p) 【流程小文】: 去之前被频道的小猫变装视频勾住了,果断约了头课,宝宝很好还给我点了冰美式可惜送到广州老家了(哈哈哈哈),果然是个笨蛋美女,我喜欢,小区在东站附近应该属于还建房,不用登记好停车,课室也很好找,可能短开并没有找高档小区,进门第一眼看见一个元气满满的妹妹在沙发上唱歌等我,一身小吊带把丰满的小白兔挤的呼之欲出,不经意间露出的马甲线证明了老师平时的自律习惯很好,老师颜值t1中属于耐看型,性格活泼可爱的很健谈,闲聊一会来到浴室洗鸳鸯浴,浴室花活也不少,先是打上沐浴露用大奶挤压我的小弟,然后再背面用小翘臀夹住小弟一顿摩擦,最后冲干水中萧收尾,一套流程下来非常舒服,帮忙擦干回到房间,今天选

29 Jun 2026, 16:06 UTC271 viewsread 11 August 2026

羊城晚报报告模板 【出击报告】(https://t.me/yangchengEveningnew ) 【位置坐标】 #广州 #天河 【优势】 【劣势】 【妹子花名】:#奶糕BB 【联系方式】:@bbxx152 【妹子年龄】:不清楚 【验证留名】:利奥利 【验证时间】:2026.6.26 【修车水费】: 1500p 【颜值】:好看的类型 颜值评分:15分(满分15分) 【身材】:前凸后翘皮肤好 身材评分:15分(满分15分) 【服务态度】:态度非常的好 服务评分:15分( 满分15分) 【情绪价值】:非常活泼可爱 情绪评分:15分 (满分15分) 【时间管理】:课位/课时安排合理 时间评分:10分 (满分10分) 【同价位合理性】:符合价位 价位评分:10分 (满分10分) 【卫生环境】:很高端,超出期待 环境评分:10分(满分10分) 【额外加分项】:有小玩具玩 额外加分:10分

10 Jun 2026, 09:37 UTC343 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

羊城晚报报告模板 【出击报告】https://t.me/yangchengEveningnew 【位置坐标】 #广州 天河区 【优势】颜值身材好,粤语交流 【劣势】 【妹子花名】:#奶糕 【联系方式】:@bbxx152 【妹子年龄】:25左右 【验证留名】:妙龄叔 【验证时间】:6.10 【修车水费】:2500pp 【颜值】:妆容好看舒服 颜值评分: 14分(满分15分) 【身材】:马甲线锁骨真的爱了,身高如果高一些对于我来说就完美。 身材评分: 14分(满分15分) 【服务态度】:有小玩具哦 服务评分: 15分( 满分15分) 【情绪价值】:粤语交流挺舒服, 情绪评分: 15分 (满分15分) 【时间管理】:课位/课时安排合理 时间评分: 10分 (满分10分) 【同价位合理性】:超出价位 价位评分: 9分 (满分10分) 【卫生环境】:事前事有清洗,课室干净整洁方便停车 环境评分:

1

9 Jun 2026, 09:12 UTC254 viewsread 11 August 2026

羊城晚报报告模板 【出击报告】https://t.me/yangchengEveningnew 【位置坐标】 #广州 天河区 【优势】颜值身材好 【劣势】没给蛇 【妹子花名】:#奶糕 【联系方式】:@bbxx152 【妹子年龄】:25左右 【验证留名】:杜仲 【验证时间】:6.9 【修车水费】:1500p 【颜值】:好看 颜值评分: 13分(满分15分) 【身材】:很棒 身材评分: 15分(满分15分) 【服务态度】:可以 服务评分: 13分( 满分15分) 【情绪价值】:正常交流 情绪评分: 13分 (满分15分) 【时间管理】:课位/课时安排合理 时间评分: 10分 (满分10分) 【同价位合理性】:超出价位 价位评分: 8分 (满分10分) 【卫生环境】:事前事有清洗,课室干净整洁方便停车 环境评分: 10分(满分10分) 【额外加分项】:举例说明你觉得比较满意的一点 :身材好

28 May 2026, 03:56 UTC227 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

羊城晚报报告模板 【出击报告】(https://t.me/yangchengEveningnew ) 【位置坐标】 #广州 #天河 【优势】课室豪华,老师自带m属性,全天然,粤语 【劣势】广东女孩的纯粹简单直率,玩手机不过聊到老师感兴趣的话题就特别多话 【妹子花名】:#奶糕 【联系方式】:@bbxx152 【妹子年龄】:20多 【验证留名】:红西吧 【验证时间】:5月的某一天 【修车水费】:p(二返) 【颜值】: 颜值评分: 12分(满分15分) 【身材】: 身材评分: 12分(满分15分) 【服务态度】: 服务评分: 13分( 满分15分) 【情绪价值】:爱答不理/正常交流/沟通愉快 情绪评分: 10分 (满分15分) 【时间管理】:课位/课时安排是否合理 时间评分: 10分 (满分10分) 【同价位合理性】:不符合价位/符合价位/超出价位 价位评分: 8分 (满分10分) 【卫生环境】

1

22 May 2026, 17:28 UTC206 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

羊城晚报报告模板 【出击报告】(https://t.me/yangchengEveningnew ) 【位置坐标】 #广州 #天河 【优势】我爱她 【劣势】我爱她 【妹子花名】:#奶糕 【联系方式】:@bbxx152 【妹子年龄】:20多 【验证留名】:红西吧 【验证时间】:26年5月的某一个沉船时刻 【修车水费】:p 【颜值】: 颜值评分: 13分(满分15分) 【身材】: 身材评分: 13分(满分15分) 【服务态度】: 服务评分: 11分( 满分15分) 【情绪价值】:正常交流 情绪评分: 10分 (满分15分) 【时间管理】:课位/课时安排合理 时间评分: 10分 (满分10分) 【同价位合理性】:符合价位或者略超价位 价位评分: 9分 (满分10分) 【卫生环境】:事前事有无清洗,课室干净整洁方便停车 环境评分: 10分(满分10分) 【额外加分项】:我爱她 额外加分:

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ngzshp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BB真实好评” (@Ngzshp), 36 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ngzshp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.