Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НейроАбьюз

Channel

НейроАбьюз

@NeyroAbyuz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

162subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002490618162
TypeChannel
Username@NeyroAbyuz
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NeyroAbyuz

Growth

162165163.57 August 2026 — 165 subscribers8 August 2026 — 165 subscribers15 August 2026 — 164 subscribers28 August 2026 — 163 subscribers4 September 2026 — 162 subscribers7 August 20264 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 28 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 162–165 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 17:19162-1
28 Aug 2026, 18:28163-1
15 Aug 2026, 00:17164-1
8 Aug 2026, 16:02165no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:13165first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 17s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

983 reactions across 20 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥20420.8%
15816.1%
👍14715.0%
👏656.61%
😁585.90%
🤣545.49%
😱444.48%
👻383.87%
🤯313.15%
🥰262.64%
🫡222.24%
🤨212.14%
🤔181.83%
💯171.73%
🤓131.32%
🤝90.916%
🤪90.916%
70.712%
70.712%
🗿70.712%
7 further kinds282.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 983 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 4 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Dec 2025, 10:55 UTC57 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Cascadeur выкатил свежий инструмент для интерполяции, который работает прямо на устройстве — никакие данные никуда не улетают. Анимация походки собирается за секунды, даже если вы впервые открыли 3D-софт. Для инди-разработчиков без денег на захват движений — это фактически новый уровень нейроабьюза.

1👻1🔥1

3 Dec 2025, 11:05 UTC53 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас половину времени провожу в офлайне — будто вернулся в эпоху локальных серверов и ручного деплоя. Параллельно тяну ещё несколько онлайн-проектов, и каждый из них считает, что именно он — прод. Зима выматывает так, будто я живу в перманентном дедлайне, где кофе — единственный API, который не падает. Но впереди будет жарко: ощущение, что грядёт сезон высоких нагрузок, когда даже жизненный мониторинг начнёт красне

❤‍🔥1💯1🔥1🤔1🥴1

15 Nov 2025, 11:37 UTC115 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Перевёл проект на нейросеть. Теперь она пишет коммиты со словами сам исправил, не благодари.

😁13🤣11🔥8🤯8👏3😱1

13 Nov 2025, 10:57 UTC135 views66 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Робот в Tesla сказал, что устал. Индустриальный нейроабьюз становится реальностью.

👍19🔥1716😁10🏆3🥰1

12 Nov 2025, 11:02 UTC158 views72 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

ИИ-агенты добрались и до Minecraft. Теперь школьники вместо одноклассников промтят Стива — тот копает, строит и даже охраняет базу. Фактически — ИИ-рабство в кубическом мире. Нейроабьюз с элементами творчества.

👍18🔥16🥰1612👏10

11 Nov 2025, 09:55 UTC122 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Новый менеджер ставит задачи по тональности голоса. Это даже не микроменеджмент — это абьюз с машинным обучением.

🔥1210🫡10👍9🤨9😱7

9 Nov 2025, 10:09 UTC124 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кто-то сказал “искусственный интеллект — это инструмент”. А потом GPT забрал у него презентацию и сделал лучше.

👏1311🤯10🔥8💋6😱6

7 Nov 2025, 11:49 UTC155 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В офисе спорим, кто быстрее — человек или GPT. Пока побеждает кофе.

😁15👏12🔥109💯6🫡4

6 Nov 2025, 14:06 UTC151 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Alibaba выкатила Qwen3-Max — зверя на триллион параметров. Теперь доступна в Qwen Chat бесплатно. Кодит, рассуждает и решает задачи быстрее Claude и DeepSeek. Если кратко — новый уровень нейроабьюза в мире ИИ.

👍17👏1512🔥12🤓9

5 Nov 2025, 11:01 UTC104 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Наш дизайнер общается с Midjourney больше, чем с людьми. Любовь или нейроабьюз?

🤣1311👍10🔥97🗿7

4 Nov 2025, 14:15 UTC118 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Оптимизация расходов уровня абьюз

👍13🔥12😱12🤝9🤣9🫡8

3 Nov 2025, 11:11 UTC131 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я спросил у ChatGPT, как перестать прокрастинировать. Теперь у меня таск-трекер в три раза больше. Абьюз в продакшене.

👍12👏12🔥1110👻8🙏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NeyroAbyuz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НейроАбьюз” (@NeyroAbyuz), 162 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NeyroAbyuz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.