Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Casa Nerazzurra News

Channel

Casa Nerazzurra News

@NewsCasaNerazzurra

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

240subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002802789414
TypeChannel
Username@NewsCasaNerazzurra
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NewsCasaNerazzurra

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2282402348 August 2026 — 228 subscribers8 August 2026 — 228 subscribers15 August 2026 — 237 subscribers22 August 2026 — 240 subscribers28 August 2026 — 238 subscribers6 September 2026 — 239 subscribers14 September 2026 — 240 subscribers8 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 226–242 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 04:02240+1
6 Sept 2026, 12:37239+1
28 Aug 2026, 22:46238-2
22 Aug 2026, 13:42240+3
15 Aug 2026, 03:55237+9
8 Aug 2026, 13:40228no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:46228first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1629.1%
👏1221.8%
🥱814.5%
610.9%
😁610.9%
🎉47.27%
👍23.64%
😭11.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC41 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🇦🇷🇮🇹Nico Gonzalez andrà messo su altre traiettorie, la Juve deve abbassare la richiesta e l'Atletico sta lavorando ad altro, e una traiettoria per Nico può essere l'Inter, non lo possiamo escludere. Anche la Juve osserva. Frattesi? Da 4-5 sessioni di mercato deve andare via e invece sta ancora lì. Ci sarà un motivo, altrimenti domani mattina fa le valigie e se ne va. Fonte: Alfredo Pedullà 🗞 @NewsCasaNerazzurra 👥 @

Signed Den

8 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC111 viewsread 8 August 2026

🚨11 titolare Provedel, Pavard, Bovio, Bastoni, Luis Henrique, Barella, Calhanoglu, Mkhitaryan Dimarco, Pio, Bonny Fonte: Matteo Barzaghi 🗞 @NewsCasaNerazzurra 👥 @CasaNerazzurra

Signed Den

8 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC105 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

‼️⚫Sono previste a breve delle novità sulla fascia destra dell'inter Fonte: Fabrizio Romano 📰 🗞 @NewsCasaNerazzurra 👥 @CasaNerazzurra

🔥6

Signed 🄰🄻🄵🄾 🕳️⚫🔵🐐#pezzentrèout

8 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC90 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Fabrizio Romano: “Si è parlato di una chiamata di Lautaro e Zanetti a Romero, una telefonata per dirgli aspettare l’Inter. Qui non si tratta di aspettare l’Inter o di chiamare Romero. Qui si tratterebbe di chiamare Oaktree. E ovviamente non sta a Lautaro farlo, non sta ai giocatori farlo. Per Oaktree l’operazione Romero non si fa finché non esce qualcuno, come Pavard, e non solo”. 🗞 @NewsCasaNerazzurra 👥 @CasaNerazz

👏4

Signed 🄰🄻🄵🄾 🕳️⚫🔵🐐#pezzentrèout

8 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC84 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

‼️Probabile formazione Juventus Inter Fonte: Gazzetta dello Sport 📰 🗞 @NewsCasaNerazzurra 👥 @CasaNerazzurra

Signed 🄰🄻🄵🄾 🕳️⚫🔵🐐#pezzentrèout

8 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC88 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚨⛔l'Inter non ha ancora raggiunto un accordo con il Liverpool per Jones. Adesso anche il Galatasaray é interessato al giocatore. Fonte: Ian Doyle(giornalista Liverpool) 🗞 @NewsCasaNerazzurra 👥 @CasaNerazzurra

🥱1

Signed Den

8 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC95 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨❌ Non solo Romero: Inter ormai sempre più *lontana anche da Moussa Diaby*. Il Bayer Leverkusen è avanti e può chiudere a breve; inoltre l’Al Ittihad *non vuole Asllani*, proposto dai nerazzurri nell’affare. Fonte: Fabrizio Romano 📰 🗞 @NewsCasaNerazzurra 👥 @CasaNerazzurra

Signed Den

8 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC90 viewsread 8 August 2026

❌Molto difficile anche il discorso Diaby Inter, Bayer Leverkusen in netto vantaggio. Il club arabo non vuole procedere alle condizioni dell'Inter. Fonte: Fabrizio Romano 📰 🗞 @NewsCasaNerazzurra 👥 @CasaNerazzurra

Signed Den

8 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC102 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👀 Con il fallimento dell'accordo per Romero, l'Inter sta ora valutando di investire pesantemente nella posizione del quinto, per sostituire Denzel Dumfries. Fonte: Fabrizio Romano 📰 🗞 @NewsCasaNerazzurra 👥 @CasaNerazzurra

👏5

7 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC114 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❌⛔Nessuna chiamata per Romero. Fonte: Alfredo Pedullà 🗞 @NewsCasaNerazzurra 👥 @CasaNerazzurra

1

Signed Den

7 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC124 viewsread 8 August 2026

❗🚨L'Inter ha la consapevolezza che potrebbero aprirsi delle opportunità sulla fascia destra tra 5-6 giorni, nelle ultime settimane di agosto. Nico Gonzalez? Se l'Inter vorrà affondare, penso che troverà una soluzione con la Juventus. Fonte: Luca Marchetti 🗞 @NewsCasaNerazzurra 👥 @CasaNerazzurra

Signed Den

7 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC132 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🥱❗Sul taccuino di Ausilio per la destra c'è sempre Diaby, che é però seguito dal Bayer Leverkusen. Fonte: Gazzetta dello Sport 🗞 @NewsCasaNerazzurra 👥 @CasaNerazzurra

🥱5

Signed Den

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NewsCasaNerazzurra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Casa Nerazzurra News” (@NewsCasaNerazzurra), 240 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NewsCasaNerazzurra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.