Channel
@News0xMedia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
215subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001291574982 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @News0xMedia |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/News0xMedia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 215 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 216 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 216 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 305 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
曾被扣头号加密黑子的 Nikita 卸任 @X 产品负责人 X 产品负责人 Nikita Bier @nikitabier 近日确认卸任。此前他接手 X 后进一步强化推荐算法、竖屏视频和内容消费体验，不少老推友认为平台越来越像 TikTok。Nikita 本人也多次与 Crypto Twitter 发生摩擦，尤其曾公开批评大量刷 gm、机器人回复和 engagement farming 的加密账号，考虑到他当时还挂着 Solana 顾问身份，这种反差让他的任期从一开始就伴随着争议 算法推荐、视频化与流量激励三板斧其实是马斯克时代已经确定的方向。Nikita 在职期间更像是进一步加速了这一转型，他后来也开始治理这套机制产生的副作用，包括削减聚合搬运账号收益、识别原创作者并打击低质量内容农场。任职一年多期间，他推动重做 Timeline、Android、Onboarding、Notifications 和 Chat 等核心模…
Sui 宣布为所有钱包进行密码学升级以应对量子时代挑战 @SuiNetwork 公布后量子安全路线图，计划引入两套已被 NIST 标准化的抗量子签名方案。普通账户将原生支持基于格密码的 ML-DSA-65，高价值 Move 金库则采用基于哈希的 SLH-DSA-SHA2-128s，通过智能合约完成验证。两套方案采用完全不同的数学体系，避免未来其中一种密码方案出现漏洞时形成单点风险 不过解决存量账户迁移是最现实的问题。链上账户一旦发生交易，公钥通常会长期暴露，未来足够强的量子计算机如果利用 Shor 算法从公钥反推出私钥，就可能伪造用户签名 Sui 的解决方案是允许用户继续使用原有恢复短语，通过新的派生路径生成 ML-DSA-65 密钥，再利用已经上线的 Address Alias 机制替换账户授权密钥。用户无需更换地址，也不用把 Sui 资产、NFT 等全部搬到新钱包。其计划在 2026 年内将量子安全 Move 金库推…
同一个宇树科技，@HyperliquidX 上为什么会有两个价格？ 最近 Paragon 和 @tradexyz 都在 Hyperliquid 上通过 HIP-3 部署了以宇树科技为标的的永续合约，但两个市场的报价并不完全一致，部分时段的价差甚至相当明显。可明明大家都是以同一家公司为追踪标的，这是为什么？ 其实 HIP-3 Auction 拍卖的并非独家上线权，而只是一个 deployment slot，也就是一次部署永续合约市场的资格。大约每31小时会产生一个新 slot，获得者可以自行决定上线什么标的。因此 Paragon 和 TradeXYZ 可以同时推出宇树永续合约，各自拥有独立的订单簿、流动性和市场参数 从设计上看这种机制避免了任何平台永久垄断热门资产，但如果订单簿越深，价差和滑点越低，资金便越容易继续向头部市场集中，最终形成赢家通吃。此前 Ventuals 逐渐退出，TradeXYZ 一度占据超过90%的 H…
6名以太坊研究员联名上书 EIP-8363，PoS 质押收益要被踩刹车了？ 由 pintail 牵头的六名以太坊生态研究者与开发者共同提交的 EIP-8363 引发了非常大的社区争议。该提案提出 ETH 渐进式发行销毁，协议照常计算奖励，再按全网质押比例销毁一部分。质押率约 20% 时销毁 25.3%，按当前约 33% 计算，销毁比例约53.6%，共识层收益可能从 2.6% 降至1.2% 这里还有一个特别的临界值，当质押率接近 50% 时新增共识奖励将被全部抵消。也就意味着 50% 时协议将会停止用新增发行鼓励更多 ETH 参与质押的位置 该提案设置了 18 个月过渡期。小部分支持者认为降低发行可以减少未质押持有者遭受的稀释，缩小 ETH 与 stETH 等生息资产的收益差，并削弱大型节点和LST协议扩张动力。但社区的反对声音基本盖过了支持者，小型验证者可能因收益下降率先退出，大型机构反而凭借规模、MEV 和托管优势扩大…
📄 当黄金开始生息，唤醒 30 万亿美元的超级市场 在全球30万亿美元的黄金市场中，黄金作为避险资产却始终无法产生现金流，究竟是什么原因导致这一现象？Enhanced通过创新的金融策略，试图打破这一僵局，让链上黄金不仅仅是持有和交易的工具，而是能够产生收益的资产。投资者们，是否准备好迎接黄金生息的新时代？ 完整内容 →
币安下场为 MarsCoin 单独调整规则，静态持有即可领取 SPCXB 奖励 $MarsCoin 自从上线 Binance Alpha 后，奖励机制在不同用户中出现了断层。此前如果用户把 MarsCoin 放在链上钱包中，Flap @flapdotsh 合约可以识别独立地址并自动发放 SPCXB。但如果放入 Alpha 账户后，链上只能看到币安金库地址，奖励会先进入平台金库，大家无法主动领取 为解决这一问题，币安为 MarsCoin 增加了一套 CEX 持仓快照与代发机制 按照新规则币安 @binance 每天会对 Alpha 账户中的 MarsCoin 持仓进行一次随机快照，并根据用户月平均持仓计算资格。用户月均持仓至少达到 10,000 枚 MarsCoin 才可参与分配。符合条件者将在次月初收到上一个月对应的 $SPCXB，奖励直接发放至币安现货账户 这意味着 MarsCoin 的链上分红机制成功接入币安内部账…
Cloudflare Wallets 上线，冒名抢注当天就开始了 Cloudflare @Cloudflare 正式上线 Wallets，一款专为 AI Agent 设计的可编程钱包，把身份、支付、部署三件事装进同一套基建。每个账号可以抢注唯一的 https://t.co/TPH05ZoggJ handle，相当于给 AI 代理发了一张带域名的银行卡 补 AI Agent 商业化缺失的一环：代理能思考、能执行，却一直没有原生的收付款身份。由 CDN 巨头接手这个卡点，意味着支付入口直接长在网络基础设施层，项目方连钱包都不用自己发 但风险第一天就冒头了。Handle 先到先得，已经出现知名开发者没抢到自己的 ID，被迫公开声明该钱包一切行为与本人无关。域名式钱包地址天然带着身份暗示，抢注者拿到的等于一张现成的冒名名片 对用户来说，眼下最实际的动作是尽早确认自己的 Handle 归属，晚一步，你的名字就可能在替别人收钱
美股 23 小时交易进入倒计时？纳斯达克将于 12月6 日正式上线 23 小时交易 纳斯达克在最新发布的《全球交易时段 FAQ》中，首次将美股 23 小时交易的目标上线日期明确为 2026年12月6日。证券信息处理系统 SIP 以及相关配套 SEC 规则调整正在完善，亚洲和欧洲投资者将首次能够在本地白天直接交易美股，而无需一直熬夜交易 按照方案纳斯达克将在现有美东时间凌晨4点至晚上8点的交易基础上，新增晚上 9 点至次日凌晨4点的夜间交易时段。市场将会只在每晚 8 点至 9 点暂停一小时用于清算、数据处理和交易日切换。晚上 9 点至午夜完成的交易则被计入下一个交易日 不过夜盘交易有其特殊性所在。纳斯达克明确表示夜间将不支持无价格市价单、开盘单、收盘单及部分挂钩订单。凌晨4点仍未成交的订单也会被取消。夜盘还可能面临流动性较薄、买卖价差扩大和价格波动加剧等问题
FWA 开放外部买入，经济模型调整却引发社区质疑 Fake World Assets @token_works 宣布结束为期两周的初始启动阶段，并将于 8月4日美东时间下午 3 点开放 $FWA 外部买入。此前代币主要通过参与协议获得，外部用户无法直接在市场买入 为维持代币长期价值 FWA 调整了多项经济规则。未来原本流向 TokenWorks 的协议费用中，将有 50% 用于回购 $FWA，回购所得代币按照 70% 分配给购买者、10% 分配给存款者、20% 永久销毁。每次购买收取的额外手续费也将从 5% 下降至 2.5% 一开始 FWA 认为这种限制能够让真正使用协议的购买者和存款者优先获得代币，避免早期投机资金干扰价格。不过随着开放交易临近及规则调整，社区情绪迅速转向不满，不少早期参与者担心自己承担了前期资金占用和资产风险，最终却可能成为新规则下利益最少的一方 争议的核心集中在两点。首先回购只使用未来产生的费用，…
COLDCARD 攻击损失扩大至 1.1 亿美元，冷钱包安全神话被证伪？ COLDCARD @COLDCARDwallet 弱随机数事件仍在持续发酵。Galaxy Research 监测显示在此前三轮攻击转走约1367 枚BTC、涉及 4585 个地址之后，8月3日链上又出现疑似第四波集中清扫，短时间内新增转走约389枚BTC，涉及 462 个地址 四轮攻击暂时合计约 1756 枚 BTC，按目前价格计算超过1.1亿美元，涉及地址已经突破 5000 个。由于部分交易当时仍停留在内存池，Galaxy 直接提醒使用单签 COLDCARD 的钱包用户立即迁移资金 黑客的手段也在快速升级。早期资金主要汇入少数归集地址，后续则逐渐改为每批清扫多个受害地址，并为不同资金创建新的收款地址，降低链上关联度。第四波攻击还大量使用RBF替换手续费机制，通过提高矿工费争夺交易确认优先级，清扫速度一度达到正常水平的约45倍 此次攻击从早期的 …
Sushi 抢占 Robinhood Chain 股票发行入口推出 Sushi Launch Sushi @SushiSwap 正式推出面向 Robinhood Chain @RobinhoodCrypto 原生发行平台 Sushi Launch，看上去上是新增一个发币工具，背后则是 Sushi 野心的彰显，争夺这条 RWA 网络最上游的资产发行入口 Robinhood 此前已经将大量的美股和 ETF 搬到链上，并推出围绕股票Token 和现实世界资产设计的 Robinhood Chain。但资产上链只是第一步，一条真正活跃的RWA网络还需要发行、建池、交易、借贷和衍生品等基础设施 相比直接与 Uniswap 竞争普通现货交易，Sushi 选择从新资产创建和初始流动性切入。Sushi Launch允许项目方创建新代币，并选择 Robinhood Chain 上的股票 Token 或其他 RWA 资产作为交易对。新币发行后…
韩国总统府“金融犯”遭刑事举报，究竟是肇事者，还是替罪羊？ 产品推出时韩国芯片股正处于 AI 行情高点，资金迅速涌入。单股杠杆 ETF通过衍生品追踪股票每日两倍涨跌，适合短线交易，但不等于长期收益始终是股票的两倍。由于产品每日重新调整仓位，一旦股价持续震荡或突然转跌，亏损会因复利和杠杆被迅速放大 总统办公室政策室长金容范年初公开提出，既然海外市场允许此类产品，韩国也应建立本土制度。随后金融委员会加快修改规则，首批以三星电子和 SK 海力士为核心标的的单股杠杆产品于 5 月底上市，希望将境外交易需求引回国内 产品推出时韩国芯片股正处于 AI 行情高点，资金迅速涌入。单股杠杆 ETF 通过衍生品追踪股票每日两倍涨跌，适合短线交易，但不等于长期收益始终是股票的两倍。由于产品每日重新调整仓位，一旦股价持续震荡或突然转跌，亏损会因复利和杠杆被迅速放大 随着芯片股从高位回落，相关杠杆产品市值大幅缩水，韩国散户遭受巨额损失。部分机构…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @News0xMedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@News0xMedia named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“0xMedia” (@News0xMedia), 215 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/News0xMedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.