Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Neva | neva.network (News/Portal)

@NevaPortal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

370subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002221810435
TypeChannel
Username@NevaPortal
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 21 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NevaPortal

Growth

370371370.57 Aug 2026, 03:01 — 371 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:52 — 370 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:017 Aug 2026, 16:52
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 370–371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 16:52370-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:01371first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

186 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8847.3%
6434.4%
👍189.68%
👏115.91%
🙏21.08%
😱10.538%
🤯10.538%
🫡10.538%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2024 to 3 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Dec 2024, 22:02 UTC≈1,160 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

December 🌟🌟 https://x.com/nevanetwork/status/1864067366839025840

🔥2

29 Nov 2024, 05:13 UTC≈1,260 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Why Neva 2.0? A Thread 🧵👇 https://x.com/nevanetwork/status/1862363974366310608

🔥61

28 Nov 2024, 04:42 UTC≈1,330 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

New post 🔥 https://x.com/nevanetwork/status/1861992802776723687

🔥5

28 Nov 2024, 04:41 UTC983 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚀 Neva’s New Era Begins! We're thrilled to unveil Neva’s updated narrative: a truly Decentralized PoW Layer 1 blockchain, empowering communities with AI tools, fair tokenomics, and community-driven governance. Our website and docs are now live. 🌐 💻 Explore Neva: [https://neva.network?pow] 🚀 Neva New Roadmap: [https://docs.neva.network/roadmap]

🔥21👏1

27 Nov 2024, 17:02 UTC584 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

New post 🔥 https://x.com/nevanetwork/status/1861817329723605196

🔥4

27 Nov 2024, 17:01 UTC535 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

We are actively working on updates to the website and documentation, including a new concept, narrative, and roadmap. Everything is expected to be ready today. ⭐️🌟

👍5👏21

26 Nov 2024, 23:55 UTC528 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

New post 🔥 https://x.com/nevanetwork/status/1861557644156166229

3

26 Nov 2024, 18:41 UTC522 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/nevanetwork/status/1861479973845872672

2

26 Nov 2024, 18:41 UTC454 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

To clarify, as many of you have asked, there will be no token migration. Here is the only $NEVA contract: https://etherscan.io/token/0x3ada3bf9a5c5c59523d6193381c0d14787070e54 Neva network is about to unveil its true potential with an exciting new concept and narrative. Stay tuned for more updates. ⭐️

🔥3

26 Nov 2024, 17:33 UTC390 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

NEVA will evolve in concept, technology, and narrative. With the supply fully distributed and in circulation, it provides the ideal foundation for decentralization, and we will build on this. https://x.com/nevanetwork/status/1861455128072507803

🔥62

26 Nov 2024, 17:33 UTC366 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

NEVA is not dead and evolving! Keep an eye on neva.network – exciting changes are on the way. Stay tuned for NEVA 2.0! https://x.com/nevanetwork/status/1861447559606079603

🔥62

9 Sept 2024, 23:08 UTC≈1,270 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

New video featuring $NEVA! 🌟🚀 https://youtu.be/KdJycxifwD4

🔥1210

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NevaPortal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 877,091 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Neva | neva.network (News/Portal)” (@NevaPortal), 370 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NevaPortal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.