Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Neue Erde 2.0

@Neue_Erde_2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

437subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001219632054
TypeChannel
Username@Neue_Erde_2
DescriptionWerkzeuge und Lösungen für die neue Zeit
Created25 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Neue_Erde_2

Growth

4377 Aug 2026, 19:56 — 437 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:16 — 437 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:568 Aug 2026, 05:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 436–438 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 05:16437no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:56437first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 437 subscribers
Avg views / post
80.4
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,608
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,820
Videos
7,230
Links
11,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16m 35s
Average length
2m 04s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
133.3%
😁133.3%
🥰133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC56 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @GuteNachrichtenNewsPhoto

🦅 Ungewöhnliche Tierfreundschaft in Alaska! 🦊 Während einer Fahrt nahe seiner Heimat in Dutch Harbor (Alaska) traute Rene Rivera seinen Augen kaum: Auf einem Picknicktisch saßen ein wilder Fuchs und ein Weißkopfseeadler – friedlich nebeneinander wie zwei alte Freunde! ❤️ Die beiden Tiere saßen ganz entspannt auf respektvollem Abstand und schienen sich überhaupt nicht aneinander zu stören. In der Gegend sind die zwe

Signed Frank Neubauer

7 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC55 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @GuteNachrichtenNewsVideo

REALSATIRE 😄1949 lag der Rhein so trocken, dass Schiffe auf dem Steinbett saßen – und niemand rief die Klimakatastrophe aus. Ein Reminder aus dem Bundesarchiv! Kann man den Dürre-Gläubigen gerne einmal vorzeigen! 😁 Ein Film aus dem Bundesarchiv zeigt den Sommer 1949: breite Sand- und Steinbänke, Schiffe auf Grund, Fährenrampen wie Steilwände, Pegel, die für so niedrige Stände nicht ausgelegt waren. Der Tiefstand un

Signed Frank Neubauer

7 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC56 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @GuteNachrichtenNewsVideo

Fritz ist 90 und steht jeden Morgen um halb fünf in der Backstube. 👨‍🍳🍞 Seit 76 Jahren backt er im sachsen-anhaltinischen Taucha Brot. Kein Fertigzeug und keine Kompromisse, sondern echter Natursauerteig, handgeknetet in einer Maschine von 1928. 🥖 Was für andere nach Arbeit klingt, ist für Fritz pure Freude und Lebensaufgabe. Sein Brot ist Seelennahrung und wer einmal bei ihm war, weiß: Er meint das genauso. 💛 🫶 Lu

Signed Frank Neubauer

7 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC56 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @GuteNachrichtenNewsVideo

🐷 Schweinerei im Planschbecken 💦 🥵 Schweine können nicht so schwitzen wie wir, sie müssen sich von außen abkühlen. 🐖💦 Deshalb gibt’s heute eine Schweinerei im Mini-Pool. Wer will mit reinspringen? 😂 🫶 Lust auf Gute Vibes? 📱 https://t.me/GuteNachrichtenNews

Signed Frank Neubauer

7 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC58 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @GuteNachrichtenNewsPhoto

Bai Fangli war 74 Jahre alt, als er beschloss, dass er genug gearbeitet hatte. Er kehrte in sein Dorf in Hebei, China, zurück, bereit, sich nach einem Leben auszuruhen, in dem er mit einem Dreirad durch die Straßen von Tianjin gefahren war. Doch er fand etwas, das er nicht ignorieren konnte: Kinder, die auf den Feldern arbeiteten, weil ihre Familien es sich nicht leisten konnten, sie zur Schule zu schicken. An dies

🥰1

Signed Frank Neubauer

7 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC67 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @LachkanalVideo

Dipl.-Psych. Jens Corssen „Das Leben als Therapie“ @Lachkanal

Signed Frank Neubauer

7 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC84 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/Z6aUa02pQ20?si=EqLioARHddSyXiT4

Signed jutta

6 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC88 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

auch für Jeden spannend ♻️ Recyclest du? Wenn ja, warum? (🇩🇪 dt. Untertitel) 👉 Wahrscheinlich wissen das Viele bereits, aber ich bin mir sicher Viele auch nicht...und es betrifft quasi Jeden... Teile diesen Beitrag – mehr Menschen sollten das sehen 🐇 Folgen: Das Weiße Kaninchen 🤩

Signed Frank Neubauer

6 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC85 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WWG1WGAWORLDWIDEVideo

Telegram WWG1WGA 👋

Signed Frank Neubauer

6 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC86 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anonymousnews_orgPhoto

Wie lange darf ein Staat Menschen ohne Beweise in Untersuchungshaft halten, bevor aus rechtsstaatlicher Härte selbst ein Problem für den Rechtsstaat wird? Geht es im sogenannten “Reichsbürger-Prozess” wirklich um die Aufklärung mutmaßlicher Straftaten oder will man in Wirklichkeit ein politisches Exempel statuieren? Artikel lesen unter: https://www.anonymousnews.org/deutschland/reichsburger-prozess-wenn-der-rechtssta

Signed Frank Neubauer

6 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @LachkanalVideo

#Katze 🐈 @Lachkanal

😁1

Signed Frank Neubauer

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Neue_Erde_2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Neue Erde 2.0” (@Neue_Erde_2), 437 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Neue_Erde_2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.