Channel
@NeoSnipes
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
790subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001885415204 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NeoSnipes |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NeoSnipes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 790 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:10 | 791 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 792 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 792 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 December 2023 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
18 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 18 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2023 to 17 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Snipes AIππ¦π€ pinned Β«Introducing Snipe AI Premium: Unleashing the Power of Precision! π― Get ready for a new era of accuracy and efficiency with Snipe AI's Premium Model. π₯ Here's what you need to know: π Exclusive Analyst Access: Gain a competitive edge with the unparalleledβ¦Β»
Introducing Snipe AI Premium: Unleashing the Power of Precision! π― Get ready for a new era of accuracy and efficiency with Snipe AI's Premium Model. π₯ Here's what you need to know: π Exclusive Analyst Access: Gain a competitive edge with the unparalleled advantage of two expert analysts dedicated to Snipe AI premium chat. Make every decision count with their expert guidance, ask your questions and they'll be therβ¦
π15
π―SNIPES: ββ π« x 1 at Rentech Ai, 0.01Ξ ββ FDV: $530, Age: 25m 40s ββ ππ€ x 1, 0.01Ξ ββ 0x25429b4f70ba127dd86a286507590c857afbfa07 ββ βοΈ | π | π¦ | π | OTTO ββ π« x 34 at Magic Box Protocol, 4.23Ξ ββ FDV: $43.3k, Age: 39m 16s ββ ππ€ x 1, 0.1Ξ ββ 0xe820b994e940ea6482a67225155befdc26e50317 ββ βοΈ | π | π¦ | π | OTTO
π1
π―SNIPES: ββ π« x 33 at Magic Box Protocol, 4.13Ξ ββ FDV: $46.5k, Age: 39m 3s ββ ππ€ x 1, 0.2Ξ ββ 0xe820b994e940ea6482a67225155befdc26e50317 ββ βοΈ | π | π¦ | π | OTTO
π―SNIPES: ββ π« x 25 at SafeCash, 1.43Ξ ββ FDV: $14.4k, Age: 19m 27s ββ ππ€ x 1, 0.08Ξ ββ 0xa62df389b33c01f1fc8a9fc03e90850cd8695bc5 ββ βοΈ | π | π¦ | π | OTTO
π―SNIPES: ββ π« x 32 at Cock Coin, 1.25Ξ ββ FDV: $16.9k, Age: 18m 51s ββ ππ€ x 1, 0.1Ξ ββ 0x1c452a06488faeaebae7b1ae60edadc8f33f1563 ββ βοΈ | π | π¦ | π | OTTO
π―SNIPES: ββ π« x 32 at Magic Box Protocol, 3.93Ξ ββ FDV: $46.2k, Age: 38m 27s ββ ππ x 1, 0.05Ξ ββ 0xe820b994e940ea6482a67225155befdc26e50317 ββ βοΈ | π | π¦ | π | OTTO
π―SNIPES: ββ π« x 31 at Magic Box Protocol, 3.88Ξ ββ FDV: $46.2k, Age: 38m 15s ββ ππ€ x 1, 0.25Ξ ββ 0xe820b994e940ea6482a67225155befdc26e50317 ββ βοΈ | π | π¦ | π | OTTO
π―SNIPES: ββ π« x 30 at Magic Box Protocol, 3.63Ξ ββ FDV: $47.3k, Age: 37m 51s ββ ππ x 1, 0.3Ξ ββ 0xe820b994e940ea6482a67225155befdc26e50317 ββ βοΈ | π | π¦ | π | OTTO
π―SNIPES: ββ π« x 29 at Magic Box Protocol, 3.33Ξ ββ FDV: $43.8k, Age: 37m 27s ββ ππ€ x 2, 0.35Ξ ββ 0xe820b994e940ea6482a67225155befdc26e50317 ββ βοΈ | π | π¦ | π | OTTO
π1
π―SNIPES: ββ π« x 27 at Magic Box Protocol, 2.98Ξ ββ FDV: $41.5k, Age: 37m 2s ββ ππ€ x 1, 0.2Ξ ββ 0xe820b994e940ea6482a67225155befdc26e50317 ββ βοΈ | π | π¦ | π | OTTO
π―SNIPES: ββ π« x 26 at Magic Box Protocol, 2.78Ξ ββ FDV: $45.0k, Age: 36m 50s ββ ππ€ x 1, 0.1Ξ ββ 0xe820b994e940ea6482a67225155befdc26e50317 ββ βοΈ | π | π¦ | π | OTTO
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NeoSnipes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 716,357 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βSnipes AIππ¦π€β (@NeoSnipes), 790 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NeoSnipes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.