Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Collectif Némésis

@NemesisParis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

5,090subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001393208142
TypeChannel
Username@NemesisParis
Created30 October 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NemesisParis

Growth

5,0905,1085,0996 August 2026 — 5,108 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,108 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,094 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,090 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,087–5,111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:355,090-4
9 Aug 2026, 16:225,094-14
6 Aug 2026, 14:565,108no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:465,108first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 10 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18m 03s
Average length
1m 23s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,679 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
95535.6%
👏54920.5%
🤬2449.11%
🔥2047.61%
👍2007.47%
🤮1234.59%
😱762.84%
😢632.35%
🙏521.94%
😡471.75%
😭311.16%
🍌271.01%
💔271.01%
🥰271.01%
❤‍🔥230.859%
🤡190.709%
🌭60.224%
👌60.224%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,679reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Mar 2026, 19:02 UTC≈4,790 views148 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤮86😡32🔥17💔13

27 Mar 2026, 19:17 UTC≈5,840 views226 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

L’homme, de type maghrébin, l’aurait suivie dans la rue avant de coincer sa jeune victime en lui maintenant les bras d’une main, en la mordant et en lui arrachant les boutons de son jean. Il aurait ensuite tenté de la pénétrer sans y parvenir totalement, blessant au passage la jeune fille aux parties intimes. Celle-ci s’est débattue et a hurlé avec courage. À l’heure où nous écrivons ces lignes, sa maman témoigne q

🤬133🙏5227💔14

26 Mar 2026, 19:57 UTC≈4,330 views156 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

On continue le tour de nos belles sections avec Dijon, Belfort et Besançon ! 😌

👏10144👍8👌3

26 Mar 2026, 16:32 UTC≈4,230 views200 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Le CIO rétabli les tests génétiques de féminité pour participer aux JO 2028. L’admissibilité aux compétitions olympiques féminines « est désormais réservée aux personnes de sexe biologique féminin », non porteuse du gène SRY (qui détermine le sexe), bannissant à la fois les sportifs transgenres et une grande partie des athlètes intersexes. C’est une excellente nouvelle pour la protection de la catégorie féminine da

👏14050❤‍🔥8🤡2

24 Mar 2026, 18:21 UTC≈3,440 views200 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Notre section Bordeaux 🪽❤️

140👏46🥰8🌭6

23 Mar 2026, 16:48 UTC≈3,570 views131 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Trois hommes, intervenus pour défendre des femmes agressées, ont payé leur courage de leurs vies. Trois hommes, dont l’honneur était plus grand que la peur, ont été sauvagement assassinés par un individu pour lequel « non » n’est pas entendable. Mais une question se pose, pourquoi la police n’a pas arrêté le forcené lors de la première altercation ? En situation irrégulière, sous l’empire manifeste de l’alcool, agr

🤬74😱41🔥9👏7

22 Mar 2026, 11:08 UTC≈3,040 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Beaucoup de notre argent pour… pas grand chose 🤡

🔥60👍29🤮8🍌3

22 Mar 2026, 11:07 UTC≈2,890 views98 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍62🍌24👏93

19 Mar 2026, 18:05 UTC≈3,220 views116 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

https://www.collectif-nemesis.com/devenir-sympathisant

👍6923❤‍🔥15🤡9

18 Mar 2026, 11:32 UTC≈3,150 views170 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Il y a deux jours, lors de l’édition spéciale consacrée aux élections municipales sur BFMTV, Mathilde Panot, présidente du groupe LFI à l’Assemblée nationale, expliquait que Raphaël Arnault (de son vrai nom Archenault) était « plus que nécessaire » et qu’il allait « revenir » sur la scène politique, malgré l’affaire Quentin. Pour rappel, trois de ses assistants, ou anciens assistants, sont mis en examen pour le meur

🔥86👏46🤮29👍9

17 Mar 2026, 18:19 UTC≈4,910 views169 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Comme vous l’avez constaté, Némésis fait face à une offensive d’une violence inédite. Après le meurtre barbare de Quentin, lynché à mort par des assistants parlementaires LFI issus de la Jeune Garde, nous avons assisté à une tentative d’inversion accusatoire aussi cynique qu’indécente, orchestrée par une gauche prête à tout pour masquer l’horreur des faits. Face à l’évidence, ne pouvant étouffer la gravité de ce dram

117👏32👍12🔥8

14 Mar 2026, 11:06 UTC≈3,320 views161 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Témoignage poignant. Droguée puis violée par deux OQTF kurdes, cette dame extrêmement courageuse n’a pas hésité à prendre le micro pour nous raconter son histoire. Après le traumatisme du viol, elle a dû affronter le traumatisme de ne pas être entendue par la justice, malgré les aveux de ses bourreaux. Raillée par les juges lors du procès, elle risque aujourd’hui à tout moment de recroiser ses agresseurs. Merci au

👏85😱35😢29😭12

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @NemesisParis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 218,218 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q101003153 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelCollectif Némésis
DescriptionIdentitarian women's organization in France
X / Twitter@Coll_Nemesis
YouTubeUCepOGXl2auvBubuBNyh4UjQ
Official sitehttps://collectif-nemesis.com/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Collectif Némésis” (@NemesisParis), 5,090 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NemesisParis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.