Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Небосвод UTM/aeroscript

@NebosvodUTM

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,401subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001724366796
TypeChannel
Username@NebosvodUTM
DescriptionВсе о беспилотном воздушном движении. Цифровая платформа Небосвод Skyarc.ru
Created28 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/NebosvodUTM

Growth

2,4016 Aug 2026, 09:23 — 2,401 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:32 — 2,401 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:236 Aug 2026, 09:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,399–2,403 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 09:322,401no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:232,401first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.1%
avg views ÷ 2,401 subscribers
Avg views / post
579
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held18 (3 June 202622 July 2026)
Views total1,157
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
296
Videos
73
Links
301

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

166 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8752.4%
🔥4929.5%
2012.0%
👏63.61%
🤓31.81%
🤬10.602%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC606 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дождь и ветер – тоже участники испытаний 17 и 18 июля на территории эко-парка «Русский берег» состоялся очередной этап тестирования беспилотной доставки в рамках ИТ-фестиваля ULCAMP’26. Организатор мероприятитя — «Консорциум БАС» (Центр компетенций ВЭБ.РФ по беспилотным автономным системам). Эксплуатанты беспилотных авиационных систем (БАС) — компании «Ирбис Скай Тех» и «КлеверКоптер» — отрабатывали логистику пер

👍62👏1

13 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC865 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

От картинки на дисплее до автономного маневра: как будет устроен тактический деконфликтинг в Небосводе В прошлом посте цикла мы рассказали про стратегический деконфликтинг — сервис, который минимизирует конфликты ещё на этапе планирования, до взлёта. Но воздух живёт своей жизнью, и заранее полностью исключить риск невозможно: траектории меняются, планы корректируются, погода вносит свои поправки. Здесь в дело вступ

👍8

6 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC≈1,670 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍10🔥4

6 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC≈1,630 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Испытание дронов-курьеров на Волге С 3 по 5 июля в эко-парке «Русский берег» (Старомайнский район, Ульяновская область) прошёл первый масштабный эксперимент по доставке товаров дронами разных эксплуатантов — в рамках фестиваля Summer Merge 2026 и конкурса Drone Delivery Contest. Три эксплуатанта — «Ирбис Скай Тех», «Глория Эйр» и «Клевер Коптер» — выполнили более 45 доставок через акваторию Старомайнского залива. В

🔥9👍5

3 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,090 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как в «Небосводе» выстраивается система предупреждения конфликтов Продолжаем цикл о невидимой части платформы: сегодня — о том, как в «Небосводе» последовательно выстраивается система предупреждения конфликтов, и почему первый шаг сделан именно на стратегическом уровне. Откуда взялась эта задача? Массовый выход беспилотных авиационных систем в нижнее воздушное пространство изменил саму природу воздушного движения.

👍72🤬1

22 Jun 2026, 13:37 UTC≈1,340 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В прошлых постах мы писали, что модуль «Наблюдение» в «Небосводе» работает не с одним конкретным типом данных, а собирает единую картину воздушной обстановки из разных источников. У каждой такой технологии — свои сильные стороны, свои ограничения и свой сценарий применения. Начнём с нашего протокола для получения данных с НСУ/C2. Для нас это одно из ключевых решений — потому что оно очень хорошо отвечает требованиям

🔥8👏4👍21

10 Jun 2026, 13:25 UTC≈1,410 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Продолжаем погружаться в тему. В разговоре о наблюдении за полётами легко попасть в иллюзию простоты: кажется, что вся задача сводится к тому, чтобы увидеть борт на экране. Но сама отметка — это только финальная, самая видимая часть работы. Самое важное происходит раньше: в момент, когда система принимает данные, проверяет их, сопоставляет между собой и только потом превращает в понятную картину воздушной обстановки.

🔥74👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @NebosvodUTM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 349,878 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Небосвод UTM/aeroscript” (@NebosvodUTM), 2,401 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NebosvodUTM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.