Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نبض رابطه

Channel

نبض رابطه

@Nbzrbt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

62subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 25 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003851307664
TypeChannel
Username@Nbzrbt
Descriptionروانشناسی رابطه، ازدواج و سلامت جنسی آموزش‌های علمی و کاربردی برای ساختن رابطه‌های سالم‌تر با زهرا فرهنگ | روانشناس بالینی خانواده و سکس‌تراپیست ش ن روانشناسی ۵۵۲۳۸ نوبتدهی حضوری و آنلاین:۰۹۰۲۵۴۷۵۸۳۷
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 September 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Nbzrbt

Growth

6225 Sept 2026, 04:48 — 62 subscribers25 Sept 2026, 05:22 — 62 subscribers25 Sept 2026, 04:4825 Sept 2026, 05:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 05:2262no change
25 Sept 2026, 04:4862first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.4%
avg views ÷ 62 subscribers
Avg views / post
33.1
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held20 (16 September 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total662
Reactions total47
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 05:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Videos
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏817.0%
👌714.9%
❤612.8%
👍612.8%
🤔510.6%
⚡48.51%
❤‍🔥36.38%
💔24.26%
🥰24.26%
🥴24.26%
🤓12.13%
🤷‍♂12.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 20:23 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

چشم های شب را به پنجره سپردیم و نمی دانستیم آفتاب که بالا بیاید ستاره ها به خواب می روند و ماه پنجره را فراموش خواهد کرد #شانی_بختیاری

👌2❤‍🔥1

24 Sept 2026, 16:54 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 25 September 2026

❤️ درخواست رابطه فقط وظیفه‌ی مردها نیست! گاهی هنوز این باور وجود دارد که مرد باید شروع‌کننده باشه و زن فقط منتظر بمونه.. اما در یک رابطه‌ی صمیمانه، هر دو نفر می‌تونند آغازگر باشند.. زن هم می‌تونه بگه که: «دلم می‌خواد امشب بیشتر کنار هم باشیم.» مرد هم می‌تونه نیازش را بدون خجالت مطرح کنه.. ✔️و مهم‌تر از همه: هیچ‌کدام از این درخواست‌ها، تعهد به پذیرفتن ایجاد نمی‌کنه. یک «نه» محترمانه به معنی «تو رو دوست ندارم» نی…

👌1🤔1

24 Sept 2026, 09:07 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 25 September 2026

🫣 چرا گفتن «دلم رابطه می‌خواد» برای خیلی‌ها این‌قدر سخته؟ گاهی مسئله فقط خجالت نیست؛ پشت این شرم، ترس‌های عمیق‌تری وجود دارد: ترس از رد شدن؛ ترس از قضاوت شدن؛ ترس از اینکه «زیادی مشتاق» به نظر برسیم؛ یا حتی ترس از اینکه اگر نیازمان را نشان بدهیم، آسیب‌پذیر شویم. برای بعضی‌ها هم از کودکی یاد گرفته شده که درباره‌ی مسائل جنسی حرف نزنند و نیاز جنسی را پنهان کنند. اما در رابطه‌ی صمیمانه، شناختن و بیان محترمانه‌ی نیازه…

👏2

24 Sept 2026, 06:51 UTC50 views2 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

🌱 تا حالا شده دلت رابطه‌ی جنسی بخواد، اما خجالت بکشی خودت مطرحش کنی؟ خیلی وقت‌ها در رابطه، نیاز جنسی داریم اما منتظریم طرف مقابل خودش متوجه بشه؛ یا با خودمون می‌گیم: «اگه دوستم داشته باشه، خودش باید بفهمه.» «اگه من درخواست کنم، شاید فکر کنه خیلی مشتاقم.» «خجالت می‌کشم بگم دلم رابطه می‌خواد.» «نکنه جواب منفی بده و من احساس طرد شدن کنم؟» اما واقعیت اینه که نیاز داشتن، خجالت‌آور نیست. ✔️در یک رابطه‌ی سالم، هم زن و ه…

👌2

24 Sept 2026, 02:12 UTC46 views4 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

‏اگه هیچ‌وقت رها نکنی، دیگه نوری به زندگیت نمی‌تابه.. سلام به دومین روز از پاییز دوست داشتنی🍁🍂

⚡4

23 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC44 views3 reactionsread 25 September 2026

💬 به‌جای «دیدی گفتم؟» چی بگیم؟ فرض کن همسرت کاری کرده که از قبل درباره‌اش بهش هشدار داده بودی و حالا نتیجه‌ی خوبی نگرفته… اولین جمله‌ای که ممکنه بیاد توی ذهنت اینه: «دیدی گفتم؟! 🙄» اما اگر هدفت اینه که همسرت از این اتفاق چیزی یاد بگیره، نه اینکه فقط احساس شکست و سرزنش کنه، می‌تونی جور دیگه‌ای باهاش حرف بزنی. مثلاً: ❌ «دیدی گفتم این کارو نکن؟!» ✅ «حالا که این اتفاق افتاده، بیا ببینیم دفعه‌ی بعد چطور می‌تونیم به…

👏3

23 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTC32 views2 reactionsread 25 September 2026

🌿نبض رابطه: قرار نیست همیشه ثابت کنیم حق با ما بوده؛ گاهی مهم‌تر اینه که رابطه‌ ما امن بمونه..

👌2

23 Sept 2026, 14:19 UTC32 views2 reactionsread 25 September 2026

🚫 «دیدی گفتم؟!» ممنوع! گاهی همسرمان اشتباه می‌کند؛ همان لحظه‌ای که نتیجه‌ی اشتباهش را می‌بیند، احتمالاً خودش هم به اندازه‌ی کافی ناراحت، پشیمان یا مضطرب است. پس لازم نیست ما هم با جمله‌ی «دیدی گفتم؟» نمک روی زخمش بپاشیم! 😅 قرار نیست هر بار که پیش‌بینی‌مان درست از آب درآمد، آن را به رخ همسرمان بکشیم. چون اگر یک نفر احساس کند که در رابطه‌اش اجازه‌ی اشتباه کردن ندارد، کم‌کم یاد می‌گیرد که اشتباهاتش را پنهان کند؛ کمت…

❤‍🔥1🤷‍♂1

22 Sept 2026, 14:28 UTC26 views2 reactionsread 25 September 2026

💍 امروز روز پیشنهاد ازدواجه… همون لحظه‌ای که شاید قلبت تندتر بزنه، ذوق کنی، گریه‌ات بگیره و هزار تا تصویر از آینده بیاد توی ذهنت… اما درست وسط همین هیجان، یه لحظه مکث کن. قبل از اینکه بگی «بله»، از خودت بپرس: 🤍 اگر هیچ‌کس از من انتظار ازدواج نداشت، باز هم این آدم رو انتخاب می‌کردم؟ 🤍 کنار این آدم بیشتر خودِ واقعی خودمم یا بیشتر درگیر راضی نگه داشتنشم؟ 🤍 وقتی با هم اختلاف داریم، احساس امنیت می‌کنم یا ترس و اضطرا…

❤‍🔥1🤓1

22 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC27 views2 reactionsread 25 September 2026

عشق آنگاه زیبا ترین روایت خود را می نویسد که یار، پناه دل معشوق باشد نه آزمونِ صبر او..🩵 پس از غرزدنای بی حد بگذریم و عبور کنیم😁

🥴2

22 Sept 2026, 07:51 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 25 September 2026

حالا تو کدومی؟ 👀 وقتی چیزی ناراحتت می‌کنه: ① زیاد درباره‌ش حرف می‌زنی ② مدام توی ذهنت مرورش می‌کنی ③ سریع دنبال راه‌حل می‌گردی ④ خودت رو سرگرم می‌کنی تا بهش فکر نکنی نبض رابطه| جایی برای آگاهانه دوست داشتن🌿

🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Nbzrbt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نبض رابطه” (@Nbzrbt), 62 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nbzrbt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.