Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nazum

Channel

Nazum

@Nazumart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

165subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001655419369
TypeChannel
Username@Nazumart
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nazumart

Growth

1631651647 August 2026 — 163 subscribers8 August 2026 — 163 subscribers15 August 2026 — 165 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 163–165 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 10:37165+2
8 Aug 2026, 16:31163no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:38163first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.6%
avg views ÷ 165 subscribers
Avg views / post
133
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (27 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total798
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52109563069527589102922.8%
custom 53187788195139502432721.3%
custom 54046564071296289932721.3%
custom 53190071485653414811612.6%
custom 5424939373005126071118.66%
custom 5235728802142759605107.87%
custom 523818830227990946275.51%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Nazumart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC38 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Опа, коллаба с DEN окончена, теперь вы можете наслаждаться этим шедевром наших двух пупсов

custom 53187788195139502435custom 54046564071296289933custom 54249393730051260711

4 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC88 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пацаны на отдыхе, не мешайте им

custom 53190071485653414817custom 54046564071296289933custom 53187788195139502432

25 Jul 2026, 21:12 UTC149 views9 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спойлер к предстоящему арту

custom 52357288021427596055custom 52109563069527589102custom 53190071485653414812

21 Jul 2026, 19:25 UTC184 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Победили Акио/Иори, буду в скором времени готовить 3 из 4 частей

custom 53190071485653414812

21 Jul 2026, 06:24 UTC188 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Кто будет на след арте

  1. Минами/Акио40%
  2. Акио/Иори60%
  3. Мать Фуккацуми/Акайо (Отец Фуккацуми)30%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Jul 2026, 06:23 UTC151 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

2️⃣ 🔤🔤 4️⃣ 2 часть из 4 готова, теперь ваш черед выбирать следующего персонажа на арте, но на этот раз будет двойной арт, к 9 вечера подведу итоги

custom 54046564071296289932

18 Jul 2026, 05:46 UTC133 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем делать эту задумку

custom 52109563069527589105custom 54046564071296289932custom 53190071485653414811

17 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC158 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ой, получается кто-то новый

custom 52109563069527589107custom 53187788195139502432custom 54046564071296289932

11 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC221 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Подарил плакат и теперь выложу в свой ТГК

custom 531877881951395024311custom 54046564071296289936custom 52357288021427596055

8 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC241 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не дома, но зато при деле всегда

custom 52381883022799094625custom 52109563069527589101custom 53187788195139502431

8 Jul 2026, 02:48 UTC209 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Работаем

custom 52109563069527589104custom 52381883022799094622custom 53187788195139502431

30 Jun 2026, 05:37 UTC255 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну вот он, муж Фуккатсуми

custom 52109563069527589104custom 54249393730051260714custom 53187788195139502432

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Nazumart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jul 2026, 06:24 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

Кто будет на след арте

  1. Минами/Акио40%
  2. Акио/Иори60%
  3. Мать Фуккацуми/Акайо (Отец Фуккацуми)30%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jun 2026, 21:19 UTCFinal Results8 voters

2️⃣ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤

  1. Иори25%
  2. Акио25%
  3. Минами13%
  4. Агнесса13%
  5. Кэзуки38%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 102,686 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nazum” (@Nazumart), 165 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nazumart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.