Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Наташа Урсу говорит (и показывает)

Channel

Наташа Урсу говорит (и показывает)

@Natasha_Ursu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

168subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002339490111
TypeChannel
Username@Natasha_Ursu
DescriptionБольшая интересная жизнь - каждому!
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Natasha_Ursu

Growth

1686 August 2026 — 168 subscribers8 August 2026 — 168 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 167–169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:31168no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:52168first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.5%
avg views ÷ 168 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 May 20262 August 2026)
Views total184
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
294
Videos
6
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

236 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12653.4%
🔥4519.1%
🤣2611.0%
🤩156.36%
83.39%
👍62.54%
🤔62.54%
💔31.27%
🐳10.424%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Natasha_Ursu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 May 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC46 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Письмо в прошлое. Что я рассказала бы себе о кризисе среднего возраста (если бы могла) "В середине жизни ты будешь переплывать большую и глубокую реку. В психологии она называется тревожным словом "кризис". Или чуть более обнадеживающе - "перевал в середине пути". Но мне ближе образ реки: тебе нужно переплыть с одного берега на другой (его не видно и долго не будет видно). Регулярно приходится нырять до самого дна,

93🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC69 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я люблю кофе, но... ... только не подумайте, что я кофеман, понимающий что-то в сортах, странах изготовления и способах варки. Я вообще ничего об этом не знаю. Я люблю кофе, но всё, что мне от него нужно - молочный вкус, (желательно) красивый стакан (но можно и нет), который я буду нести в руке, или симпатичное кафе (но и это не обязательно). Обязательное - особенное ощущение. Взрослости? Нет, скорее богемности. Ка

7🔥2🤩2

29 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC69 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Но, пожалуй, размотав эту киноленту по кадрам, от самого начала, могу уже осознать: та, кто пережила всё это - остается собой вне зависимости от декораций. Та, кто учился, путешествовал, попадал в чудесные и дурацкие ситуация - это я. И всё моё останется со мной даже если я кофе больше вообще никогда в жизни не выпью! Но я конечно выпью. Ну хотя бы в новых или особенных местах!

8🔥2🤩2

26 Jun 2026, 13:28 UTC125 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @TG_music_botFile

🎧 Нажми, чтобы найти песню ⭐️ Telegram звёзды берут здесь

2

10 Jun 2026, 08:18 UTC178 views10 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

😅🤣 #смеемся

🤣5🔥3🐳1🤔1

6 Jun 2026, 07:55 UTC191 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Моя подруга написала книгу и я сейчас сижу и читаю книгу своей подруги. Представляете? Что-то на взрослом и сбывшемся. Написала настоящую книгу, с сюжетом, героями и местами (которых и которые я лично или через подругу знаю), тонкими наблюдениями, от которых я на 26 странице начала плакать. Удивительные чувства, для которых у меня пока нет слов. Потому что готова книга - это не рассказы о своей жизни в сообщениях

🔥87

5 Jun 2026, 07:25 UTC168 views10 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤣🤣🤣 ОПГ СДВГ #смеемся

🤣9👍1

5 Jun 2026, 05:24 UTC138 views20 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Даже не знаю что кажется мне более странным: - знакомиться если вы с человеком уже давно и крепко знакомы или - не знакомиться заново, предполагая, что встретившись в две-тысячи-каком-то-там году вы продолжаете быть теми же и представляться - излишне. Пожалуй - второе. Можешь ли ты уверенно сказать, что знаешь человека, если с момента вашей первой или последней встречи он пережил личный кризис? Или сменил место ж

14🔥4🤩2

4 Jun 2026, 15:10 UTC104 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

"Здравствуйте, уважаемый Джозеф Кемпбелл! Вам пишет большая поклонница вашего творчества: я несколько раз читала книгу "Тысячеликий герой", обсуждала её содержание с парой сотен людей. И, конечно, сама совершила уже не одно путешествие героя, в котором мне очень помогло понимание этапов и их последовательности. Уважаемый Джозеф, не сочтите за наглость, но кажется, что в вашу гениальную схему нужно добавить один пу

9🤣4🤔3🤩2

4 Jun 2026, 12:57 UTC98 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤣🤣🤣 #смеемся

🤣8🤩3👍1🤔1

4 Jun 2026, 11:16 UTC109 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Томск встречает меня запахами, которые каким-то образом совершенно не изменились. Пока моя жизнь вертелась во все стороны - повороты, провалы, подъемы, движение в обратную сторону, замирание - некоторые вещи посмели оставаться ровне теми же, какими были 20 лет назад. Как?! ------------- По дороге от нашего нынешнего дома до детского сада - магазин, прошедший путь от районного гастронома до весьма современного супер

8💔3🔥3🤩1

1 Jun 2026, 01:42 UTC105 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @TG_music_botFile

🎧 Нажми, чтобы найти песню 🤑 Telegram TON берут здесь

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Natasha_Ursu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 645,109 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Наташа Урсу говорит (и показывает)” (@Natasha_Ursu), 168 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Natasha_Ursu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.