Channel
@NatanielVesninsky04
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 25 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004404771202 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NatanielVesninsky04 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NatanielVesninsky04 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 15 | no change |
| 25 Sept 2026, 11:47 | 15 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 September 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 412 |
| Reactions total | 42 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
42 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 45.2% | |
| 👾 | 10 | 23.8% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 21.4% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 2.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Давненько я тут ничего не писал, но, в целом, что уж есть Было очень много тренировок, потому что, как оказалось, кроме меня никто нормально режим не тянет, так что мы с Рико гоняли их до изнеможения, пока они не поняли, как надо работать Завтра у нас домашний матч. Черепахи Бельмонто лишатся панциря в первом же тайме, а дальше задавим их опытом
Капитан самый лучший!!! Обеденный перерыв довольно короткий, мы взяли еду и засели Вдвоем за стол, Из-за которого он выгнал кого-то из новеньких Воронов и на полном серьезе объясняет мне как это решать. Потому что после тренировки мозгов не будет уже не только у меня, они останутся на корте
❤2
Я, конечно же, понимаю, пары, задачи и все такое... Но какого хрена у меня в ответе мышка бежит со скоростью 6000м/с?... Мышка, чем ты питаешься, что так быстро бегаешь? И ведь главное я пересчитал, ещё больше вышло... Попрошу Рико помочь.... Или конспекты его возьму, смотря что действеннее
❤2🔥1
Как же я тебя понимаю, капитан!!! Это самый лучший кайф в жизни, только ради этого стоит изматывать себя в ноль
🔥1
Ого, а я и не замечал, что они такие слабаки. Я один что ли бегу около тебя и ещё успеваю хихи ловить?
🔥1
Капитан ни на секунду не позволяет в себе сомневаться Так ему и надо. И вообще, я вот шучу, что прогуляю, но не прогуливаю же К счастью, сегодня выходной, так что у нас заканчивается поздний завтрак и мы летим обратно на корт!!! Ура, бегать до потери пульса!!!
❤1🍓1
Не обращайте внимания, я просто ненавязчиво намекаю Рико, кто не стоит его внимания. Капитан, можно я его сам проучу? Он задолбал правила нарушать. Он че, блатной что ли тут?
❤1
Мы с любимой командой вчера так устали, что аж забыли выложить нечто весьма очевидное. Вороны вновь привезли домой победу! Вообще, для вас это не новость явно, ведь проиграть мы можем только если забудем про жалкое существование соперника и не явимся на матч. Вот только если мы позволим себе такое, эта страна так и не узнает, что лучшие здесь только мы и лучшие по праву.
❤1
Я проснулся раньше, чем положено, нифига не улыбнулся, захотел всех убить и понял, что второй раз просто не могу уснуть... Когда там уже на корт? Мне без дела не канает
❤1
И снова едем на матч! Правда опять трястись в автобусе не хочется, но что поделать, победа сама себя не привезёт
❤1👾1
Нам скинули после пары видео, которое показывали в конце занятия. У нас преподаватель с приветом, решил, что в конце занятия надо разбавить обстановку приятной музыкой.... Группа в восторге, только Вороны готовы задушить препода на месте, и я в том числе. А пораньше отпустить с занятия нельзя? Вот это, поверьте, очень сильно подняло бы нам настроение, а музыка ваша, хоть я и понимаю, о чем там, только время наше трат…
❤1👾1
Снова на занятиях, чтоб их. Нет, я, конечно, не самый умный среди первокурсников, в частности наших новеньких, зато я был допущен до игр всего через две недели после начала тренировок с нашим капитаном и ждал только поступления, а они уже почти месяц не могут даже первое упражнение отработать
❤1👾1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NatanielVesninsky04. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nathaniel Vesninski” (@NatanielVesninsky04), 15 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NatanielVesninsky04.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.