Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝓖𝓸𝓵𝓭𝓮𝓷 𝓯𝓸𝔁

@NatJean_aftg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

64subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003898115695
TypeChannel
Username@NatJean_aftg
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 21 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NatJean_aftg

Growth

6466657 August 2026 — 66 subscribers10 August 2026 — 66 subscribers15 August 2026 — 64 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64–66 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 14:1864-2
10 Aug 2026, 02:0166no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:4766first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
106.6%
avg views ÷ 64 subscribers
Avg views / post
68.2
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total614
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2124.7%
custom 53932016090921292301618.8%
💋1618.8%
1416.5%
custom 539339822839997121278.24%
🍓78.24%
🔥44.71%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC22 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

для какой зарисовки делать продолжение?

  1. Эндрюнаты33%
  2. Рикожаны67%
  3. другая зарисовка11%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed 𝓙𝓮𝓪𝓷 𝓨𝓿𝓮𝓼 𝓜𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓾

4 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC53 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

а мне 17 теперь

custom 53932016090921292303❤‍🔥1custom 53933982283999712121

Signed κυρя

4 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC54 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

а у меня др

❤‍🔥4💋4custom 53933982283999712122custom 53932016090921292301

Signed κυρя

30 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC81 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Зарисовка, Рикожаны 18+ На тренировке Рико знатно замотал всех повторением одного и того же приёма до идеала и после тренировки ни у кого ни на что сил не было, правда Жан сегодня был в каком то другом настроении и даже тренировки не испортили его хороший настрой. дело в том что Рико в пьяном бреду пообещал Моро что если тот не сделает ни одной ошибки на тренировке то тогда он полностью будет в его распоряжении. воз

custom 539320160909212923052❤‍🔥1custom 53933982283999712121

Signed 𝓙𝓮𝓪𝓷 𝓨𝓿𝓮𝓼 𝓜𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓾

27 Jul 2026, 18:58 UTC79 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Зарисовка, Эндрюнаты 18+ флафф Эндрю работает барменом в ночном клубе и Ната это все время очень бесит. хоть он и не показывает этого, но очень ревнует своего парня к остальным этим пьяным уродам, которые то и дело подкатывают к тому, кто принадлежит ему и никому больше. И вот в очередной раз Натаниэль освобождается со своей работы пораньше и заказывает им домой разных вкусняшек, а также мороженое для Эндрю, садитс

custom 539320160909212923031custom 53933982283999712121

Signed 𝓙𝓮𝓪𝓷 𝓨𝓿𝓮𝓼 𝓜𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓾

24 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC72 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Эндрюнаты 18+ и Рикожаны 18+... интересное сочетание конечно, ну ладно)

❤‍🔥4custom 53932016090921292302💋1custom 53933982283999712121

Signed 𝓙𝓮𝓪𝓷 𝓨𝓿𝓮𝓼 𝓜𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓾

22 Jul 2026, 23:37 UTC82 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

жанр зарисовок

  1. флафф21%
  2. 18+54%
  3. стекло21%
  4. флафф 18+54%
  5. стекло 18+25%

The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed 𝓙𝓮𝓪𝓷 𝓨𝓿𝓮𝓼 𝓜𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓾

22 Jul 2026, 23:36 UTC83 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

какие пейринги к зарисовкам?

  1. Эндрюнаты56%
  2. Рикожаны50%
  3. Кеврико44%
  4. Эндрико38%

The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed 𝓙𝓮𝓪𝓷 𝓨𝓿𝓮𝓼 𝓜𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓾

20 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC88 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Зарисовка, Никки&Эрик флафф Эрик стоял в аэропорту и с нетерпением ждал, когда же прилетит его любимый парень, человек с которым ничего не страшно и с тем, с кем можно забыть о всех проблемах. Клозе держал в руке большой букет жёлтых лилий и ходил из стороны в сторону, но когда услышал знакомый голос сразу кинулся к Никки. —ты не представляешь как я скучал... чего же ты так долго шёл, я чуть с ума не сошёл - тихо г

custom 53932016090921292301custom 53933982283999712121

Signed 𝓙𝓮𝓪𝓷 𝓨𝓿𝓮𝓼 𝓜𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓾

13 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC115 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Зарисовка, Элоди&Жан (Элоди жива, Жан сбежал из Воронов и живёт с сестрой в квартире) Утро Жана начинается не с будильника и даже не с голоса сокомандника, его утро начинается с запаха вкусного завтрака, который приготовила его младшая сестра. Моро сонно открывает глаза и в пижаме, с растрёпанными волосами идет на кухню где видит Элоди. молодая девушка 15-ти лет стоит за плитой и дожаривает яичницу. волосы во все с

1❤‍🔥1custom 53932016090921292301

Signed 𝓙𝓮𝓪𝓷 𝓨𝓿𝓮𝓼 𝓜𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓾

12 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC91 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Зарисовка, Рикоаароны (Аарон играет за воронов) —сука я убью его если еще раз он хоть на метр к тебе подойдёт! - кричал Рико и сжимал кулаки от злости, его ревность штука серьезная да и с ним самим шутки плохи. Аарон был сильно напуган, потому что слышал от сокомандников что когда Рико злой то он может избить или чего хуже... конечно никогда с ним такого не было, ведь у них с Рико так сказать особые отношения. они

❤‍🔥42💋2🔥1

Signed 𝓙𝓮𝓪𝓷 𝓨𝓿𝓮𝓼 𝓜𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓾

11 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC71 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Зарисовка, Эндрюнаты прогулка Натаниэль встал рано, в принципе он всегда вставал рано, но для выходного дня это было слишком рано. на часах 5 утра, Эндрю ещё спит и судя по всему совсем не собирается просыпаться как минимум часа 4, но Веснински решил иначе. Рыжий сходил в душ, собрался и как кот аккуратно забрался на кровать и стал гладить Миньярда по волосам. Эндрю почувствовал это и отдëрнулся как ошпаренный, но

💋3🔥2❤‍🔥1🍓1

Signed 𝓙𝓮𝓪𝓷 𝓨𝓿𝓮𝓼 𝓜𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓾

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NatJean_aftg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

для какой зарисовки делать продолжение?

  1. Эндрюнаты33%
  2. Рикожаны67%
  3. другая зарисовка11%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Jul 2026, 23:37 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

жанр зарисовок

  1. флафф21%
  2. 18+54%
  3. стекло21%
  4. флафф 18+54%
  5. стекло 18+25%

The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Jul 2026, 23:36 UTCFinal Results16 voters

какие пейринги к зарисовкам?

  1. Эндрюнаты56%
  2. Рикожаны50%
  3. Кеврико44%
  4. Эндрико38%

The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Jun 2026, 21:56 UTCAnonymous Poll35 voters

какие зарисовки больше нравятся?

  1. флафф31%
  2. стекло11%
  3. 18+80%
  4. грубость40%
  5. все вперемешку29%

The shares total 191%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Jun 2026, 18:32 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

выбираем пейринг и сюжет для новой зарисовки

  1. Джерижаны, флафф, совместный вечер35%
  2. Никки&Эрик, стекло, разговор по телефону8%
  3. Рикожаны, стекло, 18+, наказание за непослушание35%
  4. Кевэндрилы, 18+, секс под алкоголем62%
  5. кнопка админа19%

The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,157,918 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝓖𝓸𝓵𝓭𝓮𝓷 𝓯𝓸𝔁” (@NatJean_aftg), 64 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NatJean_aftg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.