Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ምክር ለወጣቶች

Channel

ምክር ለወጣቶች

@NasihaLishebab

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,801subscribers

+1,428 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003964219570
TypeChannel
Username@NasihaLishebab
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 3 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NasihaLishebab

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Abu_Umer1/53233 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC@NasihaLishebab/743 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC1.0017 minutes
@Abu_Umer1/53335 Aug 2026, 03:12 UTC@NasihaLishebab/749 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 03:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@Abu_Umer1/53345 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC@NasihaLishebab/750 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC1.004.2 hours
@NasihaLishebab/752 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC@Abu_Umer1/53375 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC1.0011 minutes
@Abu_Umer1/53426 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC@NasihaLishebab/757 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC1.00under a minute
@Abu_Umer1/53436 Aug 2026, 05:55 UTC@NasihaLishebab/758 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC1.002.4 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Abu_Umer17 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.009 minutes@Abu_Umer1 (61)
@YeselefochTeketay6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (42)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 3 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @NasihaLishebab — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,3736,8016,0876 August 2026 — 5,373 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,373 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,378 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,460 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,615 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,710 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,753 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,922 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,023 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,154 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,286 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,404 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,530 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,643 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,801 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 40 days, net +1,428. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,159–7,015 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 08:566,801+158
11 Sept 2026, 22:386,643+113
7 Sept 2026, 23:016,530+126
2 Sept 2026, 18:186,404+118
30 Aug 2026, 20:296,286+132
27 Aug 2026, 21:586,154+131
24 Aug 2026, 12:276,023+101
21 Aug 2026, 04:575,922+169
17 Aug 2026, 20:055,753+43
15 Aug 2026, 03:045,710+95
12 Aug 2026, 05:425,615+155
9 Aug 2026, 04:115,460+82
6 Aug 2026, 14:255,378+5
6 Aug 2026, 12:315,373no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:235,373first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 51 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 07s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

989 reactions across 49 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍70771.5%
949.50%
😁484.85%
💯424.25%
👏313.13%
🍓141.42%
👀90.91%
🤮70.708%
🥰70.708%
🔥60.607%
😢60.607%
💔50.506%
👎40.404%
😭30.303%
🤝30.303%
🏆20.202%
👌10.101%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 989 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC128 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

የጧት ዚክር 👇👇👇👇👇 وَاذْكُرِ اسْمَ رَبِّكَ بُكْرَةً وَأَصِيلًا ▪️የጌታህን ስም በጧትና በማታ አውሳ!! ውሎህን በዚክር ጀምር 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ ▪️اللهم بِكَ أصْبَحْنَا، وَ بِكَ أمْسَيْنَا، وَ بِكَ نَحْيَا، وَ بِكَ نَمُوتُ، وَ إلَيْكَ النُّشُورُ. አላህ ሆይ በአንተ ለዚህ ማለዳ በቅተናል፡፡ በአንተ ለምሽት እንበቃለን፡፡ በአንተ ህያው ሆነና፡፡ በአንተም እንሞታለን፡፡ መመለሻ ወደ አንተ ነው፡፡ اللّهـمَّ أَنْتَ رَبِّـي لا إلهَ إلاّ أَنْتَ ، خَلَقْتَنـي وَأَنا عَبْـدُك ، وَأَنا عَلـى عَهْـدِكَ وَوَعْـ

👍5

11 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC481 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ቀናችንን በ ቁርአን እንዝጋ የምሽት ስንቅ ለቀልብዎ🫀 https://t.me/NasihaLishebab

6👍6

11 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC≈1,330 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

አሰላሙአለይኩም ወራህመቱላሂ ወበረካቱ እህት ወንድሞች አንድ ነገር ላስቸግራቹ ነው ለአላህ ብላቹ ተባበሩኝ አንዲት እህት ስደት ከመጣች ሁለት አመት ሆኗታል ግን በጣም እሚያሳዝነው አሰሪዋ ጠንቋይ ናትና ልጅታን ምንም ነገር እንዳታቅ አድርጋ አፍዝዛታለች እናም ይችህ እህት አላህ ዳኚ ሲላት ዝምብላ ከቤቱ ትወጣለች ከዛም ሲደክማት መንገድ ላይ ቁጭ ትላለች ከዛም አንድ ሱዳናዊ ግለሰብ ያያታል ሲያያት ግን ልጅቷ ላይ ችግር እንዳለ ይረዳና ጠጋ ብሎ ሲጠይቃት ተስፋን የሚያስቆርጡ ንግግሮችን ትመልስለታለች እሱም ችግር እንዳለ ይረዳና ያለውን ገንዘብ ሰጣትና ሪያድ ኢንባሲ ብላ እንድትሳፈር ተባበራት ከዛም ይችህ እህት ወደ ኢንባሲው ከገባች ቦሀላ ፈዛ ቁጭ ባለችበት

👍4

11 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC579 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ይሄን አቋም ስለያዝንኮ ነው "ለተሚይ" እያሉ ስማችን ለማጥልሸት ሚሞክሩት እነ ኢብኑ ሙነወር እና አምሳዮቹ👎 አላህ ይምራቸው🤲

👍5

11 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC622 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ሰለፎች ቀደምቶች እንዲህ ነበሩ… ——— በቢድዐህ ባለ ቤቶች ላይ የነበራቸው ጥንካሬ!! قال ابن بطة -رحمه الله - في الإبانة ص ٢٦٢ (ولا تشاور أحداً من أهل البدع في دينك، ولا ترافقه في سفرك، وإن أمكنك أن لا تقربه في جوارك. ومن السنة مجانبة كل من اعتقد شيئاً مما ذكرناه - أي من البدع - وهجرانه والمقت له، وهجران مَنْ والاه ونصره وذبَّ عنه وصاحبه وإنْ كان الفاعل لذلك يظهر السنة!) ታላቁ ኢማም 387 ዓ.ሂ ላይ የሞቱት አቢ ዐብደላህ ዑበይዲላህ ቢን ሙሀመድ ኢብኑ በጠህ አል-ዑክበሪይ (ረሂመሁላህ)

👍1

11 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC737 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ስሜት መከተል መጨረሻው ይሄ ነው ከንደዝህ አይነቱ አይን ያወጣ ጥመት አላህ ይጠብቀን https://t.me/NasihaLishebab https://t.me/NasihaLishebab

👍4👀2

11 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC840 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ሴት ልጅ በተፈጥሯዋ የሚያቀብጣትን ባል ትወዳለች... ባሏ ዘንድ እንዴ ህፃን መሆን መቅበጥ ያምራታል ልክ በአባቷ ትኬሻ ላይ መውጣት መውደቅ እንደሚያምራት ስታገባ ደግሞ በባሏ ትኬሻ መውጣት መውረድ መጫወት ያምራታል!! ያኔ በትካሻህ ስትረማመድ ስትዘል እንዴት ብትንቀኝ ነው የሷ መጫዋቻ ነኝ እንዴ ብለህ ክብርህ የተነካ የተዋረድክ መስሎህ እዳትጮህባት አደራ!? በዚህ ጉዳይ እንደ ህፃን ያደርጋታል ተፈጥሮም ጭምር ስለሆነ በተቻለህ በዚህ ጉዳይ አቅባጭ ባል ሁንላት !

👍42😁83👀1

11 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC917 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

አላህ ሁለት ልቦችን ማቀራረብ ከሻ፤ በመካከላቸው ያለው ርቀት የሰማይና የምድር ያህል እንኳን ቢሆን ያሰባስባቸዋል፡፡ ዝምብላችሁ ዱዓ አድርጉ!!

👍32💯17

11 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC900 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ከሚፈስ እንባ የበለጠ የሚስቅ ጥርስ ነዉ ብዙ ሀዘን ያለው !!

👍28

10 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC996 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026

አራት ሴት ማግባት ሙባህ ነው አራቱንም መዝሀብ ማወቅ ዲን ነው🙌

👍22😁18👏6💯5👎2

10 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC≈1,010 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚔️ የእውነተኛ ጀግንነት መለኪያ 📚 ​«ጀግና ወንድ ማለት አራት ሴት ያገባ ሳይሆን፤ አራቱንም የፊቅሂ መዝሀቦች ፈትፍቶ ያወቀና የተረዳ ነው!» https://t.me/NasihaLishebab

👍464💯4👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @NasihaLishebab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ምክር ለወጣቶች” (@NasihaLishebab), 6,801 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NasihaLishebab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.