4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 207–276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 19:06
268
+51
8 Aug 2026, 19:41
217
+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:48
215
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:44
215
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 23 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1029.9%
avg views ÷ 268 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,760
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.942%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
13 (23 October 2025 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
2,760
Reactions total
26
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
107 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
44
41.1%
🔥
24
22.4%
custom 5381979224619892428
10
9.35%
👍
9
8.41%
👌
6
5.61%
custom 5787498156828660380
5
4.67%
💯
4
3.74%
💋
3
2.80%
🤣
2
1.87%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Погнали, братва — у нас жаркий розыгрыш от «Нашенских812»! Разыгрываем классную футболку, сшитую не на фабрике у дяди Вани, а с душой, как надо — чётко по крою, прочно по строчке, с характером по принту.
Чтобы шансов было больше, чем у таксиста на Mercedes:
1️⃣ Быть в теме — состоять в группе.
Разыграем вечером 16 августа — случайно, честно, без кидалова. Победитель получит не просто вещь, а статус: ты теперь часть д…
Всех приветствую, теперь о дельном, бирки в другом материале готовы, сейчас будут стираться тестироваться как будут себя вести, нити что лезут будут запаяватся, каким образом что бы это аккуратно выглядело пока тоже не понятно, в процессе, спасибо за внимание!
Добрый день, братва, на первых исходниках столкнулся с делемой, 1 фото нульцовой готовой бирки, 2/3 фото после одной стирки «Хлопок 40“(градусов)», что при 30" не известно будет, вывод 50/50, бирка имеет винтажный вид такой, нужно ваше мнение как вы видите это, в любом случае уже идёт процесс выбора нового материала!
На швы не обращайте внимание в ручную сам пришивал!😬
Браслет “Нашенские812” — минимализм, который говорит громче слов.
Тонкая цепочка в сочетании с нашим лого создаёт аккуратный акцент на запястье.
Каждый браслет изготовлен из нержавейки, комфортно носится и хорошо садится на руку.
Длина браслета на выбор 16см или 18см (с учётом цепочки «удлинителя»)!
Подойдёт всем, кто ценит стиль, лаконичность и символику бренда.
Идеальный подарок — и отличный способ выразить свою…
Доброе утро друзья, работаем с принтами, на моменте ДТФ печати возникли некие трудности, всё чинится всё получается, в скором времени уже будут свежие новости, работаем, стараемся, вам спасибо за внимание и ожидание, всем добра!🤩
А тем временем можете обратить внимание на бренд BUSH , молодой, амбициозный, стильный минималистичный, сам хожу, рекомендую!☁️
Добрый день дорогие друзья, работаем над поиском качественной ткани и разработкой лекал под футболки, так же воплощаем одну идею, пока карты раскрывать не буду, всем связь!🏴
Так же есть идея таких шевронов с фоном панельки!
Интересующих в лс: @Dirtyji
Возвращаем наличие подвесок «НАШЕНСКИЕ812»
Габариты подвески: 1,6х3см
Длинна цепочки: 50см
Цена вопроса: 3000₽
В стоимость входит: подвеска вместе с цепочкой выполненные из нержавеющей стали. Все красиво и надежно упаковано
Для связи: @Dirtyji
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Nashensky812. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2025 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 981,281 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НАШЕНСКИЕ” (@Nashensky812), 268 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nashensky812.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
