Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇺🇦НАШЕ ППО 🚀Де Ракета|Де Шахед📡

Channel

🇺🇦НАШЕ ППО 🚀Де Ракета|Де Шахед📡

@Nashee_PPO

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

34,991subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001883390828
TypeChannel
Username@Nashee_PPO
Description❗Перевірена інформація про повітряний простір України: 🚀Напрямок ворожих ракет. 📡Напрямок ворожих Шахедів. 🛬Активність руснявої авіації. ❗️Миттєва інформація про пуски ракет. 📞Зв'язок:
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nashee_PPO

Growth

34,99135,05935,0257 August 2026 — 35,045 subscribers7 August 2026 — 35,039 subscribers8 August 2026 — 35,036 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,025 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,021 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,010 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,059 subscribers14 August 2026 — 35,035 subscribers15 August 2026 — 35,013 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35,003 subscribers17 August 2026 — 34,991 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,981–35,069 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 18:4834,991-12
16 Aug 2026, 18:2735,003-10
15 Aug 2026, 06:3635,013-22
14 Aug 2026, 00:4835,035-24
12 Aug 2026, 15:3335,059+49
11 Aug 2026, 15:0335,010-11
10 Aug 2026, 18:1535,021-4
9 Aug 2026, 17:0235,025-11
8 Aug 2026, 19:0835,036-3
7 Aug 2026, 22:3535,039-6
7 Aug 2026, 09:1535,045first reading

Engagement

366 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.2%
avg views ÷ 34,991 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,410
366 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
366
of 366 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held366 (5 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total2,712,673
Reactions total36,782
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 00:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,170
Videos
572
Links
41

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 47s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

36,782 reactions across 365 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏21,16157.5%
🤬13,15035.8%
1,1753.19%
🔥6261.70%
😢3420.93%
😭2140.582%
😁720.196%
🤡290.079%
🖕130.035%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 366 of the 366 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36,782reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 366 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 366 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Nashee_PPO. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 366 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 23:21 UTC≈1,460 views44 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⏺Дніпро/Камʼянське також чисто.

🙏41🤬3

17 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC≈1,980 views41 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⚠️Шахед на Бровари!

🙏38😭3

17 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC≈2,170 views43 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⚠️Шахед на Жовті Води!

🙏35🤬71

17 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC≈2,280 views45 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⚠️Шахед з Чернігівщини на Київщину!

🙏30🤬15

17 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC≈2,420 views44 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⚠️9х Шахедів на Камʼянське/Дніпро!

🙏34🤬91

17 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC≈3,130 views63 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⚠️Реактивний Шахед з Чернігівщини на Бровари!

🙏46🤬17

17 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC≈3,590 views68 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⚠️5х Шахедів на Запоріжжя!

🙏48🤬191

17 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC≈4,270 views75 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⚠️Шахед на Кривий Ріг!

🙏50🤬25

17 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC≈4,680 views93 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⚠️Зафіксовано пуски ударних БпЛА типу Шахед з ае Приморсько-Ахтарськ. До 18х БпЛА.

🙏55🤬371

17 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC≈5,330 views87 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⚠️Шахед на Чернігів!

🙏62🤬25

Showing the 12 most recent of 366 posts we hold for @Nashee_PPO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Північний Сич 🦉
@Northern_Sich_ukr · 98,825
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 August 2026
✈️Стратегічна авіація
@StrategicaviationT · 103,082
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇺🇦НАШЕ ППО 🚀Де Ракета|Де Шахед📡” (@Nashee_PPO), 34,991 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nashee_PPO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.