Channel
@Nash_Kharkov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
109subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001773608749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nash_Kharkov |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nash_Kharkov |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 109 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 111 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 113 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 113 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
45 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 21 | 46.7% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 15.6% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 4.44% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2024 to 7 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Скорее всего, после данной публикации постов на этом канале больше не будет, так как не о чем писать, никаких перспектив у РФ в направлении Харькова больше нет, и пока путин у власти, очевидно, что не появится. Напоследок хотелось бы пожелать остаткам тех, кто все еще подписан на наш канал, не верить в пустые обещания правительства, они и предадут, и продадут, как в 90-е, во власти все те же люди, только риторику сме…
👍3🤡3✍1🫡1😁1
Харьков под мощным обстрелом ВКС РФ.
👍4😢2
В данном посте, админ проукраинского канала сам признается в том, что хохлятские пвошники сбили шахид над жилым районом. Работа ПВО, артиллерии и т.д., запрещена всеми возможными конвенциями, если работают внутри жилых районом, если не ошибаюсь, даже города в целом, необязательно этот район должен быть жилым. Фиксируем очередное военное преступление государства террориста "Украины".
👍5❤1
Хохлятские ПВОшники сегодня ночью подбивают шахиды прямо над многоэтажными домами в жилых районах(важно, не сбивали, а именно подбивали), после чего некоторые упали на дома частного сектора.
👍3👎2🤡2❤1
Для хохлов актуально как никогда
😁1
Беспредел, это тотальная могилизация, которую устроило хохлятское оккупационное правительство в Харькове, и других городах так называемой Украины. А то, что бабушки накопали себе цветов это мелочи, ведь с такой тотальной политикой геноцида этими цветами просто некому скоро будет любоваться. Кстати, а зачем коммунальщики вообще эти цветы садили? Лучше бы на дроны для ЗСУ задонатили🐔
👍1
Только что Пыня решил в очередной раз жидко опозориться, и на фоне удачного продвижения ВС РФ в Харьковской области, заявил что взятия Харькова в планах нет, и поклянчить у хохлов переговоры... Видимо акта хохлятского террора, в результате которого обрушился подъезд дома в Белгороде ему не хватило, и таким образом он решил в очередной раз приплясать перед террористами. Отличная мотивация для бойцов России, которые …
👍4👎1🤡1
Почему взятие Липцев вооруженными силами это плохо для Харькова? Все просто, взятие Липцев позволяет вооруженным силам РФ охватывать артиллерией большую часть города. Это пол беды, основная опасность в том, что это позволит украине устраивать кровавые провокации с артиллерийскими прилетами по густонаселенным районам Харькова, для дальнейших обвинений в адрес РФ. Данная тактика используется террористическими силами …
🤬3
В Харькове отбой воздушной тревоги впервые за почти сутки!
Летит еще одна ракета
В данный момент ВС РФ, как я понимаю, наносит удар по индустриальному району Харькова. Очень мощные прилеты.
В Харькове и области зафиксирована самая продолжительная воздушная тревога с момента начала боевых действий. Она длится уже более 16 часов.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Nash_Kharkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наш Харьков” (@Nash_Kharkov), 109 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nash_Kharkov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.