Channel
@Nanking_Revival
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
516subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001727578920 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nanking_Revival |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nanking_Revival |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 516 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 518 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 518 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 20 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
11 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 4 | 36.4% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 36.4% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【臨時首都台北訊】近日，共匪執迷不悟，疑似橫加阻撓我國家元首 賴總統清德先生出訪友邦。 本台嚴正主張：國家元首出訪友邦，實係代表我全體中國同胞與世界各友邦敦睦邦誼，旨在保護僑民權益，促進國際合作，提倡國際正義，確保世界和平。 語云「漢賊不兩立」，共匪一再阻撓我外交正軌，實乃以一黨之私，置民族大義於不顧，嚴重損害全體中國國民利益。共匪逆黨應認清歷史潮流，停止賣國行徑，切勿以一黨之私自絕於人民。 (圖片來源：總統府)
👎2👍1
反蔣不反蔣？ 蔣公仙遊紀念日過矣，台獨勢力紛紛反蔣，反一位逝去五十載的一偉人。 是等人，反共不見落力，反蔣特別用力。 為何反蔣？ 反蔣人士指，蔣公曾在台灣二二八同白色恐怖時期殺害無數台灣百姓，需要轉型正義。然而在冷戰時代，各國為防赤化都會有不同的手段防共，如馬來西亞建立華人新村，泰國雇用中國國軍剿共，印尼強逼華人同化等等。而中國則是勘亂戒嚴。在失去大部份國土抵下，中國政府不得不利用極端手段來防共。而轉型正義倡議者，則否定冷戰時期反共路線，更否定蔣公領導之中國政府守護台灣的決心和成就。 香港人反蔣嗎？ 香港在中華民國八十六年易權共匪以前，除左派以外，香港人每年慶祝中國國慶，報紙使用民國紀元，蔣公逝世時仍稱之為蔣總統。即使是叫六四集會參與者收起我國國旗的左派民主組織「支聯會」，亦不曾反蔣，可見一般香港人要麼尊重蔣公，要麼對蔣公無感。 此外，即使在民八十六年易權以後，香港的教育體制即使以八路雜軍、新四匪軍、匪東江縱隊為主軸，…
👎1
南京復興 Nanking Revival pinned a photo
《譴責陸委會分裂我國》 陸委會在過去數年不斷強調「兩岸互不從屬」，並以「中國」稱呼大陸地區，係違反《中華民國憲法》、分裂國家、認同共匪九二共識觀點同解釋權，以中華民國之名台獨。 一、中華民國係代表中國。 二、我國從未承認匪偽「中華人民共和國」合法性。 三、我國主權包括匪偽政權之所有領土，包括被匪割之領土。 民進黨從來未以中華民國之觀點解釋九二共識，更附和共匪觀點，弱化本意、放棄解釋權，把一中論述為匪偽政權！更大量放棄中國、中華之名。 此外，匪酋習近平在是次會晤中亦未有提所謂「中華人民共和國」。兩岸雙方憲政框架就是一中框架，《中華民國憲法》就係一中憲法。兩岸關係本來就是內政，因此才另設陸委會而非隸屬外交部。 吾等認為，行政院大陸委員會在中央政府未有放棄大陸主權，應主張對大陸主權，現時陸委會之行為係附和中央政府以中華民國行台獨之實。 真正消滅中華民國的，除了匪偽政權外，就係台灣民進黨政府！
👎1
【昔匪酋竄訪香港二日 夜逃寶安留宿】 民國111年6月30日，匪酋 #習近平 竄訪 #香港 所謂「中国自古以来的固有领土」參與所謂「回归庆典」，當時香港已進入「由治及兴」的「国安新时代」，然匪酋不但建立超大封鎖區，更未有在港留宿，而夜乘高鐵竄逃廣東寶安（匪屬深圳）留宿，疑怕被暗殺。 今 #中國國民黨 主席 #鄭麗文 邀匪酋習近平訪台，寶島台灣作為東亞議會打鬥俵俵者，不論藍綠青鳥覺青全民勇武，鄭主席實在高估匪酋膽量，當然爾等說話可為客套。
❤1
維民國一百十五年四月八日，中國國民黨主席鄭麗文，代表全體黨員，赴京拜謁並以鮮花致祭於國民黨總理、國父孫中山先生之靈。 （圖片來源：中國國民黨） #中華民國 #國父 #孫中山 #中山陵 #國民黨 #鄭麗文
《 #讀者投稿 論中國國民黨主席鄭麗文會匪酋習近平》 #中國國民黨 主席 #鄭麗文 將會到匪佔北平會匪酋 #習近平，鄭主席與習匪酋將以黨主席涵頭見面遭各方批評，但我認為現實並非非綠即紅。 一、不對等見面 馬英九前總統在任時曾於星國會匪酋，並與匪酋以「先生」相稱，綠營認為不以總統之名就係不對等，我同意，中華民國總統係中國惟一合法領袖，但兩岸分治事實，你求對等時，對方亦求對等，見面係謀求因數、約數，顧及雙方顏面感受，方會成功。而今次鄭習二人以黨職會晤確實以達至對等。難道賴清德敢至對岸宣示主權或台獨？嗯，至少馬英九前總統在卸任後宣示了他是中國總統，擁有大陸主權。 二、戰爭還是和平 國民黨經常宣稱和平至上，有些人甚至講到共匪係好人，我不敢評論此等人，因為他們忘記了共匪的惡。然而，維持現狀最好的方法會是溝通、和台商投資，而非戰爭。共匪自己很清楚，只要不能「三月亡華」，「支爆」先於「解放台灣」，同時只要沒了台商，離「支爆」則不遠矣，台…
碧血黃花 青年不死 「夫馬革裹屍，黨人之志，埋骨已非所期，遑論留名！」 115年前，辛亥三月，欲推翻外族專制，熱血青年衝鋒陷陣，殊死拚搏。惟軍情外洩，兵備不全，寡不敵眾，或戰死沙場，或被執就義。血染廣州，長眠黃花崗，得骸七十二。草木含悲，風雲變色；吾黨精華，付之一炬。是役震驚全球，動搖滿清根基，成就武昌起義。 但願朝陽常照我土，毋忘烈士鮮血滿地。 如今國府偏安，大陸淪陷，淒涼滿目。僭主以人為物，暴虐無道。獻忠迭起，控訴極權。伊戰爆發，布衣對抗強權，以求變天；古巴補給中斷，油盡燈枯，垂死掙扎。共匪軸心分崩離析，承繼烈士遺志，枕戈待旦，光復可期。 #黃花崗 #青年節 #中華民國 #南京復興
何謂青春？ 115年前，有一群青年，風華正茂，博學多才，隨便一位都是國家干城，前途無量。 但他們決定起義了，不是官逼民反，只是義不容辭。而且明知事情敗露，明知看不到成功的一天，仍決意起義。 明知不可為而為之，明知難以成功仍先行，明知可能看不到結果，仍選擇把血流在時代前面。 這場悲壯的黃花崗起義，到今天整整115年了。 115年的時光足以淹沒一切精明的算計，足以消滅一切狂妄的身驅，但那些留在115年前的青春面容，依然自信，依然鮮活。 青年節真正值得紀念的， 或許不是青春熱血身，而是那些高貴的靈魂，曾在最有前途的年紀，為公義付出生命的代價。我為中國曾有過這樣高貴的靈魂為榮。 他們的青春是不朽的。 #黃花崗 #青年節 #自由不死
💩2❤1
#韓國 政府近日將居入境申請的國籍把「 #台灣 」寫為「 CHINA (TAIWAN) - 中國（台灣）」，引起部分台灣人同 #民進黨 當局不滿。 然而本專頁發現，韓政府把 #大陸地區 同 #港澳地區 之 #CHINA 加上了P.R.後綴，P.R. 為People's Republic 之全寫，即「人民共和」，係代表大韓民國政府清楚 #中國 和 #中華人民共和國 之分。 一般而言，如果一個國家分裂成兩個國家後，外國都會以「國名（國號）」來表示，如有些國家會將南北韓分為「Korea (DPR)」 和「Korea (Republic of)」。因此，韓國政府把台灣標為「China (Taiwan) 明顯是認 #中華民國 為 中國 正溯。而且韓政府也不可能只打China 然後叫台灣人選China，因此本專頁認為CHINA (TAIWAN) 並無不妥。 台灣在法理上確實係中國其中一個省份，而這個中國名叫—中華民國。 根據《維基…
💩2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Nanking_Revival. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 767,585 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“南京復興 Nanking Revival” (@Nanking_Revival), 516 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nanking_Revival.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.