Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐀NGKRINGAN 𝐁ASE.

Channel

𝐀NGKRINGAN 𝐁ASE.

@Nangkringbase

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

39,035subscribers

+4,585 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003205710897
TypeChannel
Username@Nangkringbase
DescriptionSEND MENFESS TO : @AutoNangkringbot ➤ Rules/Information: @Rulesnangkring @IngatNangkring @sNangkring. ➤ @PublicFiguure. ➤ Help: @Complaintnbot @NangkringHelp @.Admins ➤ RAGEBAIT AUTO BAN. ROLEPLAY BASE. @Nangkiies. Yogyakarta, DIY 55271. — #MMXXV.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nangkringbase

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

34,45039,22436,83714 August 2026 — 34,450 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,450 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,569 subscribers16 August 2026 — 34,838 subscribers17 August 2026 — 35,128 subscribers18 August 2026 — 35,260 subscribers19 August 2026 — 35,445 subscribers20 August 2026 — 35,502 subscribers21 August 2026 — 35,642 subscribers23 August 2026 — 35,892 subscribers24 August 2026 — 36,201 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,352 subscribers27 August 2026 — 36,483 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,641 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,805 subscribers30 August 2026 — 37,064 subscribers31 August 2026 — 37,266 subscribers1 September 2026 — 37,407 subscribers2 September 2026 — 37,528 subscribers3 September 2026 — 37,708 subscribers5 September 2026 — 37,878 subscribers8 September 2026 — 39,024 subscribers11 September 2026 — 39,179 subscribers13 September 2026 — 39,224 subscribers15 September 2026 — 39,214 subscribers16 September 2026 — 39,212 subscribers19 September 2026 — 39,188 subscribers25 September 2026 — 39,035 subscribers39,03514 August 202625 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 43 days, net +4,585. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,734–39,940 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 20:4239,035-153
19 Sept 2026, 08:1639,188-24
16 Sept 2026, 19:1839,212-2
15 Sept 2026, 00:3839,214-10
13 Sept 2026, 08:5939,224+45
11 Sept 2026, 08:5539,179+155
8 Sept 2026, 15:5539,024+1,146
5 Sept 2026, 07:1837,878+170
3 Sept 2026, 11:5737,708+180
2 Sept 2026, 04:1437,528+121
1 Sept 2026, 07:4337,407+141
31 Aug 2026, 05:0637,266+202
30 Aug 2026, 01:5637,064+259
29 Aug 2026, 03:5936,805+164
28 Aug 2026, 02:3836,641+158
27 Aug 2026, 04:4436,483+131
26 Aug 2026, 01:5436,352+151
24 Aug 2026, 23:5536,201+309
23 Aug 2026, 11:2835,892+250
21 Aug 2026, 20:3835,642first reading

Engagement

779 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.76%
avg views ÷ 39,035 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
280 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
280
of 779 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 121 of 280 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held779 (13 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total301,550
Reactions total2,826
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 01:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈42,500
Videos
≈1,160
Links
≈59,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
23s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,983 reactions across 251 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,43848.9%
🔥84517.0%
💯4879.77%
👍3376.76%
😍2334.68%
🏆1853.71%
😭1432.87%
🆒1262.53%
🕊1252.51%
🐳641.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 295 of the 779 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,983 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 779 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC≈2,960 views95 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Halo, Nangkies! Terkait permasalahan yang telah terjadi sebelumnya, pihak-pihak yang bersangkutan akan melaksanakan proses mediasi sebagai upaya untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan yang ada. Proses mediasi ini akan dibuka secara publik agar dapat diikuti dan disaksikan oleh pihak yang berkepentingan. Bagi yang ingin mengikuti jalannya proses mediasi, dapat dilihat dan diikuti melalui Group Chat berikut: https://t.me/…

🔥52❤24💯10🕊5🐳4

24 Sept 2026, 14:18 UTC≈4,780 views136 reactionsread 29 September 2026

. Halo, Kies. Menanggapi dan meluruskan lebih lanjut mengenai permasalahan yang sedang berkembang terkait Angkringan, kami sudah menyiapkan satu channel T.me/StopShaping. Silahkan dilihat dan disimak ya, kies. Penjelasannya akan kami sampaikan secara langsung dan mengalir, supaya konteks dari setiap persoalan bisa dibahas dengan lebih jelas. Channel tersebut juga akan kami update secara berkala seiring pembahasan b…

🔥69❤31🕊11🐳8🏆7💯7🆒3

14 Sept 2026, 09:12 UTC≈11,800 views400 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Halo, Nangkies. Kami ingin menyampaikan permintaan maaf kepada pihak-pihak yang ikut terdampak dari kesalahan Angkringan dalam menangani persoalan kemarin. Kami menyadari bahwa dalam prosesnya, Angkringan terlalu cepat menerima dan menjadikan bukti yang diberikan oleh pihak lain sebagai dasar untuk mengambil kesimpulan, tanpa terlebih dahulu melakukan cross-check secara menyeluruh mengenai konteks, waktu, serta rele…

❤240👍65😍31🕊28🆒17🐳10🔥9

12 Sept 2026, 15:15 UTC≈11,700 views212 reactionsread 29 September 2026

📣 PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. Halo, Nangkies. Admin ingin memberikan sedikit penegasan sekaligus meluruskan beberapa hal terkait persoalan yang belakangan ini berkembang. Sejak awal, admin mengambil posisi sebagai pihak yang berusaha menengahi persoalan ini, bukan sebagai pihak yang ingin memperluas konflik, menggiring opini, maupun menjatuhkan pihak tertentu. Admin berusaha melihat persoalan dari berbagai sisi dan m…

❤117🏆27💯23🔥20👍14🕊7🆒4

12 Sept 2026, 15:13 UTC≈6,830 views50 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❤24👍10🔥10🐳6

11 Sept 2026, 10:13 UTC≈8,550 views242 reactionsread 29 September 2026

❤️ . Setelah seluruh proses peninjauan selesai, admin ingin menyampaikan hasil akhir terkait persoalan ini. Berdasarkan bukti dan informasi yang telah kami terima, admin menetapkan bahwa Cysette @ttipsi merupakan bully enabler. Terdapat bukti yang menunjukkan bahwa Cysette mengetahui adanya tindakan bullying yang dilakukan oleh pihak yang memiliki hubungan pertemanan dengannya, namun tetap memilih untuk mempertahanka…

❤131🔥48🏆26😍26🆒11

11 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC≈8,160 views92 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

CW // HARSHWORDS . Halo Nangkies! Setelah meninjau kembali keseluruhan informasi, dokumentasi, serta bukti yang berkaitan dengan persoalan ini, admin menetapkan bahwa permasalahan #C tidak lagi dapat dipandang sebatas persoalan salah paham dalam kolom komentar. Berdasarkan bukti yang kami lampirkan, #C memang memiliki hubungan pertemanan dengan pihak yang berkaitan dengan tindakan bullying tersebut. Yang menjadi p…

🔥50❤28😍7👍6🆒1

10 Sept 2026, 15:38 UTC≈6,990 views162 reactionsread 29 September 2026

. Kami ingatkan kembali, yang menjadi pertimbangan utama admin bukanlah keputusan #S untuk tidak melanjutkan pembahasan, melainkan kondisi setelah permasalahan tersebut berkembang. Ketika suatu pernyataan telah disampaikan di ruang publik dan kemudian muncul pemahaman yang berbeda di antara pihak-pihak yang terlibat, admin memiliki tanggung jawab untuk memastikan agar informasi yang beredar tidak berhenti pada satu p…

❤92👍25🆒20🔥16🕊9

10 Sept 2026, 15:36 UTC≈6,480 views113 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥60❤32🕊21

Showing the 12 most recent of 779 posts we hold for @Nangkringbase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz317 voters

. Apa hal “utama” yang harus dilakukan terlebih dahulu untuk mengetahui/menentukan foto muse yang berasal dari platform halal dan haram?

  1. Bertanya ke orang lain atau base publik.9%
  2. Langsung pakai saja dulu, kalau ada teguran baru diganti.1%
  3. Scan lewat google/pinterest atau pf lain yang bisa menentukan.90%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 779 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐀NGKRINGAN 𝐁ASE.” (@Nangkringbase), 39,035 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nangkringbase.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.