قطعا خیلی ها درباره ai سوال دارن هرچیزی ذهنت درگیر کرده بپرس https://t.me/Mohsen_yousefi7

Channel
رویاهای نامعلوم یکبرنامه نویس !
@NanDreams
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
161subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002503625445 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NanDreams |
| Created | Between 1 February 2025 and 12 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NanDreams |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 161 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 159 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 161 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 162 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:19 | 162 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
161 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 98 | 60.9% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 18.0% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 12.4% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.48% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 2.48% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 1.24% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 1.24% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.24% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📢 یه سری نکته مهم برای برنامهنویسهای تازهکار بیش از 10 ساله تو حوزه برنامهنویسی کار میکنم، گفتم یه چندتا تجربه بگم که اگه جدی گرفته بشن مسیرتون خیلی هموارتر میشه 🙌💻 🎯 ۱. عجله نکن! قرار نیست تو ۶ ماه حرفهای شی. برنامهنویسی دو سرعت نیست… ماراتنه 🏃♂️ 🧠 ۲. مفهوم مهمتر از سینتکسه فقط یاد گرفتن دستورها کافی نیست. اگر اینا رو خوب بفهمی: الگوریتم، ساختمان داده، شیگرایی، طراحی نرمافزار یاد گرفتن هر زبان جدید برا…
👍1
یه موضوعی که جالب بود رو امشب ویس میگیرم ! در باره مبحث قیمت دهی در پروژه های نرم افزاری هست
❤2👍2
هفتهی پیش یه فیچر رو چهار بار deploy کردم. نه چون خراب بود. چون هر نسخه «تقریباً همون چیزی بود که میخواستم»… ولی هیچوقت کافی نبود. و این چیزی بود که منو به فکر انداخت. AI فقط سرعت ساختن رو بالا نبرده. یه چیز عمیقتر رو هم تغییر داده: رابطهی ما با “کافی بودن”. کمالگرایی همیشه یه دشمن خاموش برای برنامهنویسها بوده. همهمون تجربهش رو داریم: بازنویسی فانکشنی که کار میکنه بحثهای بیپایان روی naming refactor کردن …
❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
بریم برای بحث های ساخت ایده و کسب وکار ؟؟
- حتما77%
- چراکه نه7%
- نه حوصله ندارم16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1
📢 دوستان یه موضوع مهم براتون آوردم! این چند وقت کلی پیام گرفتم درباره اینکه: «برای رشد کردن، بهتره بریم شرکت بزرگ یا شرکت کوچیک؟» گفتم بیام تجربههای خودمو بگم شاید به دردتون خورد 🙌 --- ## 🏢 شرکت بزرگ؟ راستش رو بخواید، شرکتهای بزرگ یه خوبی بزرگ دارن: نظم و ساختار. ولی یه حقیقت مهم هم پشتشونه: 🔹 معمولاً فقط یه بخش کوچیک از سیستم دستته 🔹 کارت خیلی وقتا دیده نمیشه 🔹 با مدیرای بالارده هم کمتر در ارتباطی 🔹 و چیزی ک…
❤6👍1🔥1
حتما جوین بشید دوستان
🔥3❤2👍2
یه وقتایی پروژههای تمرینی یا تفریحی میزنم 💻🎨 گفتم بذار یه جایی جمعشون کنم، یه جور آرشیو باشه 📂 فقط اینم بگم، بعضی از پروژهها یه چیزاییان که من بهشون میگم «وایبکده» 😅 تو پیام بعدی برات میگم وایبکده دقیقاً چیه و به چه دردی میخوره 💭✨
👍3🔥3🥰2🍌1
💫 وایبکدینگ چیه؟ یه سبک از ساختنه که توش کدنویسی، اصل ماجرا نیست 💻✨ اینجا با حس و حال جلو میریم، نه با قانون و چارچوب خشک 😌 ممکنه یه ایده، یه حس یا یه طراحی ساده تبدیل بشه به یه پروژه کوچیک و جذاب 🎨🔥 تو وایبکدینگ، هدف اینه که بسازی چون حال میکنی، نه چون باید. 😎💭 هیچ مهارتی لازم نداری، فقط یه ذره حسِ ساختن میخواد 💫
🔥5❤2👍2🍌1
اقا موضوع بگید ویس بگیریم
🤔4👍2🔥2
خبری ازتون نیست(الکی مثلا من فعالم)
❤8👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NanDreams. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بریم برای بحث های ساخت ایده و کسب وکار ؟؟
- حتما77%
- چراکه نه7%
- نه حوصله ندارم16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 5 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رویاهای نامعلوم یکبرنامه نویس !” (@NanDreams), 161 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NanDreams.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.