🌐Ｓｃｉｅｎｃｅ ｌｏｖｅrｓ
🔰دوست داران علم🔬 و دانش🧪
هرچیز مفیدی که به نظر ادمین ها میتونه در راستای بهتر دیده شدن زندگی قرار بگیره رو اینجا ببینید
💠یکی از راه های رهایی از مشکلات آگاهی است، اگاهی وظیفه همه ی ماست.
⭕️ارتباط با ادمین↙️
Direct message
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 698–700 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 02:19
699
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:00
699
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
68.8%
avg views ÷ 699 subscribers
Avg views / post
481
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (21 April 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
3,368
Reactions total
94
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
380
Videos
120
Links
98
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
58m 26s
Average length
29m 13s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
168 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 4911689862010111583
124
73.8%
❤
14
8.33%
👏
14
8.33%
👍
6
3.57%
🔥
5
2.98%
🙏
2
1.19%
🤔
2
1.19%
🤓
1
0.595%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
جمهوری اسلامی در شرایط ضعف شدید ساختاری و بحران مشروعیت، قصد پیشبرد و اجرای «کنوانسیون رژیم حقوقی دریای کاسپین» (کنوانسیون آکتائو) را دارد. این تلاش رژیم، بدون پشتوانه اراده ملت ایران و بدون تضمین روشن و کامل حقوق تاریخی کشور، اقدامی نگرانکننده و تهدیدی جدی علیه منافع ملی ایران است.
بر اساس معاهدات ۱۹۲۱ و ۱۹۴۰ میان ایران و اتحاد جماهیر شوروی، رژیم حقوقی دریای کاسپین بر پایه حقوق مشترک طرفین و اصل توافق و منافع مشتر…
هممیهنانم،
امروز، سالروز امضای فرمان مشروطیت در ۱۴ مرداد ۱۲۸۵، برای ما یادآور یکی از بزرگترین جنبشهای تاریخ معاصر ایران است، جنبشی که از دل اندیشه و تلاش دهها سالهی ایراندوستانی برخاست که از عقبماندگی و نابسامانی ایران در دوران قاجار رنج میبردند.
آرمان مشروطیت بر سه اصل بنیادین استوار بود:
حاکمیت قانون،
حاکمیت ملی و اراده ملت،
و پیشرفت و ترقی ایران.
مشروطهخواهان بهخوبی دریافته بودند که بدون قانون، دادگست…
🔖 آیا مردان هنگام سرماخوردگی اغراق می کنند!
whether men are wimps or just immunologically inferior
سازمان جهانی بهداشت تأکید دارد که هنگام ارزیابی مواجهه با آنفولانزا و پیامدهای آن، باید عامل جنسیت مد نظر قرار گیرد. دادههای اپیدمیولوژیک مربوط به آنفولانزای فصلی در هنگکنگ (بین سالهای ۲۰۰۴ تا ۲۰۱۰) نشان داده که مردان بزرگسال با خطر بیشتری برای بستری شدن در بیمارستان مواجه بودند؛ همچنین در یک مطالعه مشاهدهای در ایال…
#آموزشی
سادهسازی اساس مطالعه علمی است.
در علم، ما هرگز نمیتوانیم تمام جزئیات واقعیت پیچیده را در نظر بگیریم. جهان پر از متغیرهای بیشمار، تعاملات پنهان و نویزهای تصادفی است. مطالعه علمی دقیقاً با سادهسازی آغاز میشود: حذف عوامل کماثر، تمرکز روی متغیرهای کلیدی و ساختن مدلی که جوهره مسئله را نشان دهد، حتی اگر کاملاً دقیق نباشد.
این کار نه تنها ضروری است، بلکه هنر اصلی دانشمند محسوب میشود. بدون سادهسازی، علم به تو…
چهل و شش سال از درگذشت پدرم میگذرد، اما او امروز زندهترین چهره سیاسی در پیشگاه تاریخ و دل ایرانیان است.
شعله عشق ملت ایران به او روز به روز بلندتر و فروزانتر میشود. همانطور که جاویدنام مجیدرضا رهنورد به نیابت از میلیونها جوان ایرانی نوشت: «نسلی عاشقت شد، که تو را هرگز ندید».
پدرم با تمام وجود، عاشقِ ایران بود. قلب او با طبیعت این خاک میتپید و باریدن باران بر دشتهای ایران، برایش بهترین و زیباترین خبر بود.
ا…
شش ماه پیش، در چنین شبی، تهران در تاریکی فرو رفت. سراسر ایران در تاریکی فرو رفت. اما حتی آن تاریکی نیز نتوانست میلیونها ایرانی را در خانههایشان نگه دارد.
۱۸ و ۱۹ دیماه تنها دو شب برای اعتراض نبود. شبهایی بودند که سکوت ایران شکست. میلیونها نفر به خیابانها آمدند، میدانها را پر کردند و بر بام خانههایشان ایستادند، اما رژیم با گلوله به آنان پاسخ داد. در آن چهلوهشت ساعت، دهها هزار تن از هممیهنانم جان خود را از…
#آموزشی
جمهوری و ماهیت آن (چرا باید مراقب حقه های چپ ها بود):
جمهوری، بهعنوان یک نظام حکومتی، اشکال گوناگونی دارد؛ از جمهوری ریاستی گرفته تا نیمهریاستی و پارلمانی. با این حال، بررسی تاریخ معاصر نشان میدهد که جمهوریها، بهجز موارد استثنایی، با چالشهای ساختاری جدی روبهرو بودهاند .
تنها نمونهٔ جمهوری موفق و پایدار از بدو تأسیس، ایالات متحده آمریکاست که امسال جشن ۲۵۰ سالگی استقلال و نظام جمهوری خود را برگزار می…
سه سال پیش راجع به مساله #هواداری
یا حس #مالکیت یک مطلب بسیار کوتاه نوشته بودیم (لطفا بخوانید)
اتفاقات جالب در این دهه ی گذشته نسبت به نگاه مردم ایران به تیم فوتبال از همین نوع مباحث فلسفی است.
اینجاست که مشروعیت legitimacy باید باز تعریف گردد.
نکته ی جالب برای شخص نویسنده این مطلب این است که ایران شاید بتوان گفت تنها کشور جهان است که مفهوم #آزادی را به عنوان نگاه همگانی برای #مشروعیت پذیرفته است
و این مفهوم آزادی …
The Deal, the Trap, and Ghalibaf Waiting Behind the Curtain
یک مطلب طولانی هست نوشته کاربر نظامی نویس #شین به زبان انگلیسی اگر زبانتون خوب هست مطالعه کنید سه قسمت هست قسمت دوم و سوم در کامنت های این پست مطالعه کنید
قسمت نخست ➕:
✍️✍️✍️
If Washington and Tehran reach an agreement, the real story may not be the paper itself. It may be who inside Tehran uses it to seize control.
There are two ways to read the current U…
#آموزشی
آیا جمهوری میتواند از این مهلکه جان سالم به در برد؟
سوال از کاربر #زهرا_عبدی
خیلی از آهنگ سازها و ترانه سراها شاید برای خلق و ساخت یک اثر جدید نتوانند اصلا به موزیک و یا ترانه ای شخص دیگری گوش دهند چرا که باعث میشود که شبیه آن اثر را خلق کنند
درواقع برای خلق چیز نو مجبورند از تمامی چیزهای مشابه پرهیز کنند
یکی از علت هاش کریپتومنژیا Cryptomnesia است
کریپتومنژیا Cryptomnesia یک پدیده روانشناختی است که در آن ی…
custom 49116898620101115836
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Namiascience. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 703,753 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“science lovers” (@Namiascience), 699 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Namiascience.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
