Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

NTA exams national testing agency - IIT JEE CUET

@NTA_exams

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

296subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002018276944
TypeChannel
Username@NTA_exams
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NTA_exams

Growth

2962982977 August 2026 — 297 subscribers7 August 2026 — 297 subscribers7 August 2026 — 298 subscribers14 August 2026 — 296 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 296–298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:25296-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:31298+1
7 Aug 2026, 01:32297no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:17297first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.0%
avg views ÷ 296 subscribers
Avg views / post
133
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 July 20261 August 2026)
Views total2,533
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC71 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The AIAPGET 2026 Application Correction Window is now open. Candidates can edit details in the permitted fields from 01 August to 02 August 2026 (up to 11:50 PM). Review your application carefully and complete all eligible corrections within the stipulated timeline. #AIAPGET2026 #NTA #AYUSH #ApplicationCorrection #MedicalEducation https://x.com/NTA_Exams/status/2083437552883962049 National Testing Agency https://x.c

1 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC61 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Zero tolerance for malpractice. Zero compromise on merit. The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Act, 2026 delivers swift, decisive, and uncompromising action against those who threaten exam integrity. Towards building a secure, foolproof ecosystem where hard work always wins. #NTA #ZeroTolerance #ExamIntegrity #FairExaminations #MeritFirst https://x.com/NTA_Exams/status/2083422619546857504

31 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC67 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

NTA has floated a tender for its Printing Services requirement. ⏰ Due Date: 20 Aug 2026 Printers equipped for examination-grade, high-security print work are invited to submit their bid on GeM. https://sso.gem.gov.in/ARXSSO/oauth/doLogin #GeM #Tender #NationalTestingAgency #NTA https://x.com/NTA_Exams/status/2083224910307184756 National Testing Agency https://x.com/nta_exams • this post is shared by telegram

31 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC62 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

NTA has floated a tender for Housekeeping Services for its Delhi office. ⏰ Due Date: 17 Aug 2026 Empanelled agencies with proven capacity are invited to submit their bid on GeM. https://sso.gem.gov.in/ARXSSO/oauth/doLogin #GeM #Tender #NationalTestingAgency #NTA https://x.com/NTA_Exams/status/2083223971852611911 National Testing Agency https://x.com/nta_exams • this post is shared by telegram channel @MyGov_i

31 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC64 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

NTA has floated a tender for Security Services for its Delhi office. ⏰ Due Date: 17 Aug 2026 Empanelled security agencies with a strong compliance record are invited to submit their bid on GeM. https://sso.gem.gov.in/ARXSSO/oauth/doLogin #GeM #Tender #NationalTestingAgency #NTA https://x.com/NTA_Exams/status/2083220648994976079 National Testing Agency https://x.com/nta_exams • this post is shared by telegram

28 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC125 viewsread 7 August 2026

‌Dear @Dhirajyadav09 , we are glad to note your refund has been received. Wishing you success ahead. Attention Candidates: In case, you are yet to update your bank account details on the NTA portal ( ), please do so to expedite your refund processing. Those who have updated, the refund will be issued after due Bank verification. NTA remains fully committed to processing all student refunds. #NEET2026 #StudentsFirst

20 Jul 2026, 10:35 UTC237 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Regarding OMR-related claims for NEET (UG) 2026 being circulated on social media, it may be noted that the genuine OMR of every candidate concerned is on record with NTA. It was made available on the candidate portal and emailed to the candidates at the time of the OMR Response Key challenge window. The images being circulated as the "correct" OMR are digitally fabricated. They are not documents issued by NTA. Crea

20 Jul 2026, 06:36 UTC217 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Regarding claims about Shri Avaneesh Srivastava (App No. 260411198880, Roll No. 2001805051) and his NEET (UG) 2026 OMR answer sheet: NTA has verified the record. The genuine OMR of the candidate is on file. It was also emailed to him at the registered e-mail address during the OMR Response Key challenge window. It bears the candidate’s correct name (Avaneesh Srivastava), the name of his father (Mukesh Kumar) and th

1

20 Jul 2026, 06:36 UTC162 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Regarding claims by Ms. Pratibha Trivedi (App No. 260412140662) about her NEET (UG) 2026 OMR answer sheet: NTA has verified the record. The genuine OMR of the candidate is with NTA. It was also emailed to her at the registered e-mail address during the OMR Response Key challenge window. The image being circulated is a digitally altered version of the genuine OMR sheet. It is not, however, the sheet held on record

20 Jul 2026, 06:36 UTC122 viewsread 7 August 2026

Regarding claims by Shri Abhay Yadav (App No. 260411367191) about his NEET (UG) 2026 OMR answer sheet and result: NTA has verified the record. The genuine OMR of the candidate is with NTA. It was also emailed to him at the registered e-mail address during the OMR Response Key challenge window. The candidate has stated publicly that only 5 questions were left unattempted and that the result should be 634 marks. Thi

20 Jul 2026, 06:36 UTC101 viewsread 7 August 2026

Regarding claims by Shri Lakshya Singh (App No. 260412053016) about his NEET (UG) 2026 OMR answer sheet: NTA has verified the record. The genuine OMR of the candidate is with NTA. It was also emailed to him at the registered e-mail address during the OMR Response Key challenge window. The image being circulated shows response markings that are not present on the genuine sheet. Additional bubbles have been shaded i

20 Jul 2026, 06:36 UTC121 viewsread 7 August 2026

Regarding claims by Ms. Arya Singh (App No. 260410434102) about her NEET (UG) 2026 OMR answer sheet: NTA has verified the record. The genuine OMR of the candidate is with NTA. It was also emailed to her at the registered e-mail address during the OMR Response Key challenge window. The image being circulated is a digitally altered version of that same sheet. The recorded time of signature of one of the invigilators

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NTA_exams. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,121,617 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NTA exams national testing agency - IIT JEE CUET” (@NTA_exams), 296 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NTA_exams.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.