Channel
@NINGPUFF
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
187subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002313508489 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NINGPUFF |
| Description | Phase-II, Forsooth Esotericism Aptness Competency Particular (&.) Emerge Upright Torrents Circulation With Steadfast Decide, Embracing—Serenity. 𐀶 @Ningpuffbot - @NingpuffArchive |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NINGPUFF |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 187 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 187 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
198 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6055643749780818317 | 59 | 29.8% | |
| custom 6165852507516963320 | 55 | 27.8% | |
| custom 5314310545992593238 | 31 | 15.7% | |
| custom 5316509783996510374 | 20 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5316705716109584953 | 12 | 6.06% | |
| custom 5336889506895256647 | 10 | 5.05% | |
| custom 5418072012356606889 | 7 | 3.54% | |
| custom 6309600518838684836 | 4 | 2.02% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2025 to 22 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NINGPUFF. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 September 2025 to 22 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
𐂥’. | ’23/10. Ningning's returns with brilliance that feels effortless, and impossible to forget. Today, spotlight bends a little softer, the stars hum sweeter, and even time it self seems to pause in reverence, That allure doesn’t need to shout, it simply glows. 🩷
custom 61658525075169633202
ㅤㅤㅤㅤ『NINGNING BIRTHDAY』 ㅤㅤ The Sassy Command Line of aespa. ㅤㅤㅤㅤ System Glitches in Gold ㅤㅤㅤㅤ 23 October We extend my warmest congratulations to NINGNING and every portrayer who carries her radiance with pride. May your voices never fade, your glow never dim, and your presence forever leave the world in quiet awe. ✶ “Today is the day when grace learned to dance, when warmth learned to sing, when the un…
custom 616585250751696332017custom 531650978399651037410custom 60556437497808183179custom 53368895068952566475custom 63096005188386848364custom 53167057161095849532custom 54180720123566068892
Sticker, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
yuk pakai twibbon nya! 🩷
#Spotlight23OfNingning
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝐃 𝐈 𝐒 𝐂 𝐑 𝐄 𝐏 𝐀 𝐍 𝐓 𝐈 𝐍 𝐓 𝐄 𝐑 𝐋 𝐔 𝐃 𝐄 ㅤ #Spotlight23OfNingning ㅤ ────── ⋆ ⋆ ─────── ㅤㅤㅤㅤOstentatious Nonpareil: Brandished ㅤㅤㅤㅤIncogitable Plinthe Amidst Illecebrous ㅤㅤㅤㅤConversion In Eccentrical Yeartide of ㅤㅤㅤㅤMesmeric Ningning Saturnalia. 💀˚₊‧⁺ Illustrious Limelight Rendered Descry Pinnacle Bash — 😈…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
[HFW] TWICE IF YOU CAN! 🩷 Calling all NINGNING portrayers to celebrate Ningning's birthday. ★ Shining louder than your flash and sweeter than your fav dessert. Pink champagne, glitter, she glows quietly like moonlight wrapped in velvet. Hi! I’m - Your name + @username (nama & username dimono) raising my glass for Ningning’s birthday bash! Born to dazzle, trained to slay — luxury runs in our veins and honey, we're …
ㅤㅤㅤFinest Girls in Town ☆ @yizhuvo @npaughty @ningnjng @ningyibzuo @njngyhzuo @flowetr
custom 53368895068952566474custom 61658525075169633204custom 53167057161095849533
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @NINGPUFF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 591,440 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@NINGPUFF named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Celestial Grace Ethereal Redefined, 2002 th’ ─ Ningpuff.” (@NINGPUFF), 187 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NINGPUFF.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.