Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NGcapital

Channel

NGcapital

@NGcapitall

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

528subscribers

+208 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003905176176
TypeChannel
Username@NGcapitall
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 22 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/NGcapitall

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3205284248 August 2026 — 320 subscribers8 August 2026 — 320 subscribers9 August 2026 — 322 subscribers16 August 2026 — 355 subscribers24 August 2026 — 365 subscribers1 September 2026 — 374 subscribers10 September 2026 — 456 subscribers19 September 2026 — 522 subscribers4 October 2026 — 528 subscribers8 August 20264 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 56 days, net +208. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 289–559 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 07:56528+6
19 Sept 2026, 13:22522+66
10 Sept 2026, 11:01456+82
1 Sept 2026, 13:25374+9
24 Aug 2026, 21:19365+10
16 Aug 2026, 15:25355+33
9 Aug 2026, 17:23322+2
8 Aug 2026, 20:15320no change
8 Aug 2026, 20:02320first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 41s
Average length
11m 41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

165 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6841.2%
🔥4326.1%
👍3722.4%
⚡74.24%
🤣53.03%
👏31.82%
❤‍🔥10.606%
🤮10.606%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC98 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Great reaction from the levels shared in the premarket analysis, an awesome day

❤4👍2🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC109 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Good morning everyone, Here are the main key levels I am watching for today. For now, I am waiting for a coherent intraday structure to develop before evaluating either bullish or bearish exposure. At the moment, Nasdaq is trading in a relatively balanced environment from a gamma perspective, with gamma being fairly neutral. For that reason, I do not want to force a directional bias too early. I will wait for price a…

❤4⚡2👍1

5 Aug 2026, 21:49 UTC108 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Today’s key level produced an interesting reaction. As you can see, there was also a clear absorption dynamic on the footprint, with more than 250 cumulative contracts absorbed around the area. However, the reaction did not expand enough to justify holding the position for a larger move. For that reason, the trade was managed conservatively and closed at break even. Overall, though, earlier in the session I had alrea…

👍5🔥2❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC118 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Good morning everyone, In the image, I have highlighted the two most probable reaction levels for today. As always, the reaction can develop in two different ways: either as a potential reversal area, or as a breakout and retest opportunity, depending on the order flow confirmations we get once price reaches the level. The main confirmations I will be watching are the behaviour on the footprint and the passive liquid…

❤4👍2🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC127 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Good morning, everyone. I won’t be active in the markets today. Starting tomorrow, however, I’ll be sharing a daily Nasdaq pre-market outlook on the channel, including: • the directional bias for the session; • option flow analysis; • identification of the key reaction levels; • real-time context as price approaches those levels; • volume-based analysis to assess how price may react and which scenarios are more li…

❤5🔥4👍2

3 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC143 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

In the end, after analysing the order interaction once price reached the level, the footprint showed clear seller absorption together with aggressive buyer initiative. This confirmed that buyers were not only defending the area, but were also actively stepping in with enough strength to support a potential continuation to the upside. For that reason, I positioned long on the following retest, using the reaction as co…

🔥6❤2👍2🤮1

3 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC150 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Once the key option flow level is reached, the most important thing is to observe how market participants behave around that area. The main focus now is on the relationship between volume and effort, because this will help us understand whether the level is being accepted, broken, or defended. From here, there are two main scenarios. The first scenario is a strong aggressive initiative that breaks through the level. …

❤5🔥2👍1

3 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC149 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Good morning everyone, These are the two high-probability reaction zones I am able to identify pre-market through the option flow analysis completed before the New York open. However, the actual trade plan will depend on the current gamma regime and on how volume develops during the opening phase. Based on that, I will build a coherent intraday approach to potentially target one of these two levels. The idea is not t…

👍5❤2🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC214 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

not a random reaction point to stop NQ downfall👀

🔥4❤2👍2

29 Jul 2026, 09:24 UTC236 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

By Zeus's law, the markets had better let this trade hit take profit. I might be a god in disguise😂

🤣5❤2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @NGcapitall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NGcapital” (@NGcapitall), 528 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NGcapitall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.