Channel
@NFTnews14
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,540subscribers
-113 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003992962185 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NFTnews14 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 26 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NFTnews14 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 1,540 | -77 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 1,617 | -46 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 1,663 | +11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 1,652 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 1,653 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (26 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,011 |
| Reactions total | 222 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
222 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5325570193601111697 | 80 | 36.0% | |
| custom 5472394943400012716 | 79 | 35.6% | |
| custom 5471917587849834968 | 34 | 15.3% | |
| 💘 | 29 | 13.1% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Совместный дроп подарков 💝 Cruzz News х Успех NFT • новости х 🍁 | krmvv Призы: 🎁 Chill Flame #32659 🧸 5 Мишек 💝 5 Сердец Для участия необходимо: 1️⃣ Открыть Mini App Easy Raffle по кнопке ниже 2️⃣ Подписаться на каналы участников розыгрыша 🕒 Результаты розыгрыша 12 августа 2026 года в 20:00 по МСК ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ОТКРЫТЬ РОЗЫГРЫШ
❗️❗️ ВЫШЛИ НОВЫЕ УЛУЧШЕНИЯ ПОДАРКА!!!! 🎁 - can be upgraded to NFT. Можно улучшить сейчас за скромные 1 000 000⭐️ Все доступные модельки ручек на данный момент: 🎁 Fine Pen: Stickers - Emoji В этот раз чистый шлак! 🎯
custom 54719175878498349681
🎁 ВЫШЕЛ НОВЕНЬКИЙ ПОДАРОК СО 100 САПЛАЕМ НА ТЕСТОВОМ СЕРВЕРЕ! Каждый раз за 1–2 дня до официального выхода новых лимиток всегда что-то да выходило на тест сервере. Это к чему они готовятся? И почему цена 25⭐️ при всего лишь 100 экземплярах?
ценность 66₽ ??? такое возможно?
🏆 НОВЫЕ УЛУЧШЕНИЯ НА КУБКИ ЗА 100 ЗВЁЗДОЧЕК? Один работяга ещё давно закупил себе 🏆467 кубков на сумму 46 700⭐️/$700. Тогда над ним все смеялись и считали полным придурком, а сейчас... Получается, что-то знал заранее этот гений? 🤯
custom 54723949434000127162custom 53255701936011116971custom 54719175878498349681
Фк Мишка @LOOOKI_STARS
custom 54719175878498349683custom 54723949434000127162custom 53255701936011116971
😶🌫️ АХ*ЕНЫЙ КОНКУРС НА 10 МИШЕК🎁 📱Для участия, подписка на них: @EchoStarsik @zvezdi_nft (наш канал) @KoltensBrawlStars @neil0vstars 💌Пересыл друзьям или куда то еще дает вам 56% к выигрышу.
custom 54719175878498349684custom 54723949434000127163custom 53255701936011116972
ХОТИТЕ РОЗЫГРЫШ НА 10 МИШЕК?
custom 54723949434000127169custom 53255701936011116974custom 54719175878498349683
🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: #1 » ɤesimright 🔎 Проверить результаты
custom 54719175878498349683
Фк мишка Подпишись @echostarsik
custom 547239494340001271611custom 53255701936011116974custom 54719175878498349682
ФАСТ РОЗЫГРЫШ НА НФТ итоги на 75кликов подпишись: @Rediska_NFT
custom 547239494340001271615custom 53255701936011116975custom 54719175878498349683
10 РЕАКЦИЙ И КОНКУРС НА НФТ
custom 547239494340001271610custom 54719175878498349684custom 53255701936011116972
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @NFTnews14. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 955,865 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@NFTnews14 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Успех NFT • новости” (@NFTnews14), 1,540 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NFTnews14.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.