Понимаю, что уже всем надоела своими кейсами, но всё равно…, по одной звезде крутаните кейсик в lucky Drop 😂 ЧАТ
custom 54566594588327516374

Channel
@NFTgrm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
621subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002614102391 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NFTgrm |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NFTgrm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 621 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 624 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 625 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 625 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
106 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5456659458832751637 | 91 | 85.8% | |
| custom 5334581434420073897 | 15 | 14.2% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NFTgrm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2026 to 3 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Понимаю, что уже всем надоела своими кейсами, но всё равно…, по одной звезде крутаните кейсик в lucky Drop 😂 ЧАТ
custom 54566594588327516374
Не могу пройти мимо вчерашней ситуации, хочется сказать пару слов. Очередной лудик проиграл свою Пепу. Тактика у него была "великолепная"- врываться в pvp на мелких ставках и брить залетеных игроков. Вот только на очередном далеко не первом по счету раунду, схема дала сбой. Пепа ушла сопернику со ставкой всего 10 GRAM (TON). В тильте человек слил всё, включая накопления на первую машину. Остался с нулём. Такие схе…
custom 54566594588327516379
Что-то серфы торгуются в минус. Новостей нет, движухи никакой, всё стоит в полном застое и стагнирует. Сижу и думаю - а зачем, собственно, я возвращалась? 😂 Полное затишье. Даже поговорить не о чем. А у вас как обстановка?
Апгрейды на серфы 🎁 вышли Модели: Stickers - Emoji ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Кейс за 1 ⭐️ - lucky Drop
custom 54566594588327516376
В Lucky Drop по промокоду NFTESSA можно открыть ежедневный кейс. Количество промокодов ограничено.
custom 54566594588327516375
Через пару часов TON официально превратится в GRAM. Прямо сейчас цена прыгает около 1.8$. Два года назад TON стоил 8$. Конечно, хочется верить в хороший памп к историческим значением. Но зная наше комьюнити… вряд ли выйдет что-то серьёзное. Короче, исторический день. Следим. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Кейс за 1 ⭐️ - lucky Drop
custom 54566594588327516377
Закончилось голосование за смену названия TON на Gram. Подавляющее большинство проголосовало «за» При этом остаётся вопрос: а в чём вообще был смысл этого голосования? Павел Дуров на своем недавнем выступлении публично объявил о переименовании. Получилось довольно странно... ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Кейс за 1 ⭐️ - lucky Drop
custom 54566594588327516376
Ни нормальных обновлений, ни новых подарков, ни внятных новостей. Полное затишье. Просто стоим на месте. TON при этом спокойно падает, всё стабильно. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Кейс за 1 ⭐️ - lucky Drop
custom 54566594588327516374
Ну что, кто тут тихо прикупил целую пачку Plush Pepe? ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Кейс за 1 ⭐️ - lucky Drop
custom 54566594588327516377
Portals добавили возможность покупки через СБП. Если попробуете так купить - нарвётесь на жирную комиссию около 15% от стоимости подарка в TON. Плюс сверху ещё 7-дневный холд на вывод. Абсолютно бесполезная фишка для опытных пользователей. А вот новичкам, наверное, упростили порог входа. Мне сразу вспомнился прошлогодний «Маркет и точка» от одного известного инфлюенсера. Там тоже можно было купить NFT за рубли с б…
custom 54566594588327516376
Тот самый парень, который купил Plush Pepe Barcelona, уже обменял ее на 2 Scared Cat Obelisk. 🐈⬛ + 🍀Money Pot #2 + 200 TON (Gram). А всё потому, что коты за это время успели подрасти в цене. Видимо кое-кто словил фомо. Классика. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Кейс за 1 ⭐️ - lucky Drop
custom 54566594588327516374
Тут ребрендинг грядет. TON уже отреагировал ростом до $2.18 И как это понимать? ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Кейс за 1 ⭐ - lucky Drop
custom 54566594588327516372
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NFTgrm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 783,331 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NFTелега” (@NFTgrm), 621 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NFTgrm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.