Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

NEZBY ART

@NEZBYY

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

86subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002386636370
TypeChannel
Username@NEZBYY
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NEZBYY

Growth

8610 Aug 2026, 01:16 — 86 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 12:56 — 86 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 01:1610 Aug 2026, 12:56
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85–87 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:5686no change
10 Aug 2026, 01:1686first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 20 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3834.9%
❤‍🔥3431.2%
🍓1614.7%
🥴98.26%
🥰65.50%
💋43.67%
👍21.83%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2025 to 10 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Apr 2026, 18:35 UTC288 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @s1meow1sPhoto

✨✨✨ эскизик рисовала —> киса.

❤‍🔥51

7 Apr 2026, 19:46 UTC318 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

приложила руку к созданию чуть

6

7 Apr 2026, 19:43 UTC238 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @viperrsupportPhoto

🤍𝓅𝓈𝓎𝒸𝒽𝑜𝒸𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓉 с𝑜𝓁𝓁𝑒𝒸𝓉𝒾𝑜𝓃🤍 🏜🏜𝓅𝒾𝒸𝓀𝓂𝑒 𝓅𝒾𝓃𝓀 💋 🏜🏜𝓈𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓃𝑔𝑒𝓇 𝓌𝒽𝒾𝓉𝑒 👀 🏜🏜𝒾𝓁𝑜𝓋𝑒𝑔𝑜𝒹 𝓂𝒾𝓃𝓉 🤑 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 𝓏𝒶𝓀𝒶𝓏𝒶𝓉 - 𝓇𝓇𝒸𝓇𝑒𝓌.𝑜𝓃𝑒💋

7

9 Jan 2026, 17:16 UTC566 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://t.me/death_of_pompeii автор ↑↑↑

❤‍🔥2🥴1

9 Jan 2026, 17:13 UTC465 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @viperrsupportVideo

👣 👣 𝚞𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚖𝚜𝚢𝚊 𝚣𝚊𝚟𝚝𝚛𝚊💘 👣👣 𝟷𝟶.𝟶𝟷.𝟸𝟼

2🥴1

15 Dec 2025, 16:02 UTC628 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

привет понравилась @NEZBYY 🫣

9🥴1

2 Nov 2025, 10:59 UTC861 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @blauesonnesonneRRPhoto

🤹🤩 Kai Angel x Clown Twisty🎪🤡 🖐American Horror Story crossover🩸 Art for Kai Angel 🤡❤️ Happy Halloween ~ 🦇👁 #арт@blauesonnesonneRR

🍓13❤‍🔥5🥰5🥴1

29 Oct 2025, 12:33 UTC796 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

быстренькие стадики ребят из RR CREW worstpersonever sharon P. s. В скором времени постараюсь также порадовать вас артами с Каем/Майсом

10👍2🥴2💋1

24 Oct 2025, 11:42 UTC708 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @velvshitfPhoto

?сомнительно…

❤‍🔥8💋1🥰1🥴1

20 Oct 2025, 18:25 UTC681 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

поддержите девчонку, мы очень много делаем вместе!!

3🥴1

20 Oct 2025, 18:25 UTC648 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

И еще что накопилось🤩

❤‍🔥14🍓3💋2🥴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @NEZBYY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 710,737 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NEZBY ART” (@NEZBYY), 86 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NEZBYY.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.