Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TRUTH 🫣

@NESARA_GESARA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

7,246subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001302058605
TypeChannel
Username@NESARA_GESARA
Created20 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NESARA_GESARA

Growth

7,2467,2577,251.56 August 2026 — 7,256 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,256 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,257 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,255 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,246 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,244–7,259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:037,246-9
10 Aug 2026, 03:317,255-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:537,257+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:207,256no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:527,256first reading

Engagement

96 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.04%
avg views ÷ 7,246 subscribers
Avg views / post
365
96 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.505%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
96
of 96 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 47 of 96 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held96 (3 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total35,067
Reactions total93
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 04m
Average length
3m 22s

Measured directly from 55 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

93 reactions across 42 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3032.3%
2729.0%
😁1111.8%
🤮66.45%
🔥55.38%
🤣44.30%
🎉33.23%
🙊33.23%
💯22.15%
😐11.08%
🤷‍♀11.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC152 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

DAS NEUE DEUTSCHLAND. Da ist Osman, ein türkischer Migrant, der nicht arbeitet und mit seinen drei Frauen und 22 Kindern sehr gut lebt, dank staatlicher Sozialleistungen. Und da ist Franz, ein ehemaliger Fabrikarbeiter, der 86 Jahre alt ist und nun im Ruhestand, der in Mülltonnen sucht, um etwas zu essen zu finden.

🤮4

Signed Dirk 🥃

11 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC192 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Eine Serie, die von allen geliebt wird? Die Meinung erfahrener Piloten. Ich bin Pilot bei American Airlines. Hört gut zu! Ich bin Mitglied der Flacherd-Gesellschaft. Ich bin seit 21 Jahren bei Delta Airlines und habe insgesamt 30 Jahre Flugerfahrung. Natürlich weiß ich, dass die Erde flach ist.

Signed Dirk 🥃

11 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC247 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @niusdeVideo

Weiße sind beim „Volksbad“ in Berlin am Freitag von 12 bis 18 Uhr nicht erwünscht. Früher hätte man dazu Rassentrennung gesagt und (zurecht) als rassistisch kritisiert – heute wird sowas mit Steuergeld gefördert.

😁1

Signed Dirk 🥃

11 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC270 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @niusdePhoto

TU Chemnitz weist Voigts Widerspruch gegen Entzug des Doktortitels zurück Thüringens Ministerpräsident Mario Voigt bleibt seinen Doktorgrad vorerst los. Die TU Chemnitz hat den Einspruch des CDU-Politikers gegen die Aberkennung zurückgewiesen. Hier klicken. 🤏

👍3

Signed Dirk 🥃

11 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC271 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @niusdePhoto

NIUS Live: „Die Polizei stellt sich plötzlich gegen die vom Volk gewählte Regierung“ Polizei-Putsch gegen eine AfD-Regierung? Pauline Voss spricht von einer „Art Putsch“, Ralf Höcker warnt Polizisten vor rechtlichen Folgen. Hier klicken. 🤏

😁2

Signed Dirk 🥃

11 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC251 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @niusdePhoto

Bundesbank-Schock: Wachstum nur noch auf Pump und bis 2035 trotzdem faktisch Stillstand Keine Industrienation weltweit hat sich in den letzten Jahren so schlecht entwickelt wie Deutschland. Jetzt offenbart die Deutsche Bundesbank, dass ohne die massiven zusätzlichen Staatsausgaben die Wirtschaft aktuell sogar wieder schrumpfen würde. Hier klicken. 🤏

Signed Dirk 🥃

11 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC239 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @niusdePhoto

Ab 18 Uhr bei NIUS Live am Abend: Impfrisiko für Schwangere verheimlicht! Bei NIUS Live am Abend beleuchten wir immer das Wichtigste des Tages. Am Dienstag, den 11. August, begrüßt NIUS-Moderator Andreas Dorfmann im NIUS Radio-Studio folgende Gäste: Apollo-News-Politikchef Max Roland und Autor Alexander Teske. Hier klicken. 🤏

Signed Dirk 🥃

11 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC233 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @niusdeVideo

Corona-Impfstoff: Fauci wusste von Fehlgeburt-Risiko und verschwieg es! Neu veröffentlichte Nachrichten zeigen, dass Anthony Fauci im Januar 2021 intern ein mögliches Fehlgeburtsrisiko nach der Covid-Impfung diskutierte. Wenige Tage später erklärte er öffentlich, es gebe keine Warnsignale bei Schwangeren. Senator Ron Johnson kündigte an, Fauci notfalls vorzuladen.

😁1

Signed Dirk 🥃

11 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC227 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @niusdeVideo

Massenschlägerei in Düren: Axt, Baseballschläger und Hammer im Einsatz In Düren haben sich bis zu 20 Personen eine Massenschlägerei auf offener Straße geliefert, bei der Axt, Baseballschläger und Hammer zum Einsatz kamen. Sechs Menschen wurden schwer verletzt. Unbeteiligte trennten die Gruppen noch vor Eintreffen der Polizei, zwei Männer wurden festgenommen.

Signed Dirk 🥃

11 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC222 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @niusdePhoto

NIUS Live: „Das ist ein riesiger Skandal, wie man hier die eigene Bevölkerung belogen hat“ Neue Fauci-Nachrichten: Pauline Voss spricht von einem „riesigen Skandal“. Intern wurde über Fehlgeburtsrisiken gesprochen, öffentlich von „keinen Warnsignalen“. Hier klicken. 🤏

👍1

Signed Dirk 🥃

11 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC221 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @niusdeVideo

Die „Energiewende“ mit Wind und Sonne braucht laut einer Studie auch Atomkraft. Ich bin (nicht) überrascht.

Signed Dirk 🥃

Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @NESARA_GESARA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 137,748 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TRUTH 🫣” (@NESARA_GESARA), 7,246 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NESARA_GESARA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.