30 Jun 2026, 19:17 UTCviews —
Channel name was changed to «𝐍𝚵̷̚𝐏𝐗𝐅𝐋̷̱𝐈͢𝐍͎̅𝚵 clsd.»
Channel
𝐍𝚵̷̚𝐏𝐗𝐅𝐋̷̱𝐈͢𝐍͎̅𝚵 clsd.
@NEPXFLIN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
158subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003150720009 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NEPXFLIN |
| Description | МЫ NEPHELINE | NEFELIN !!!! OWN — @NFV3RM0R. Для удобства — @NEPXFLIN. Студия сделавшая оформление — @klowneryss. |
| Created | 18 October 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NEPXFLIN |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 158 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 158 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 18 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 2 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5211014392090491350 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5251493844674966529 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5305562840071943277 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5377509727032870465 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5201671528256666386 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5303384505673869044 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5359831315225020369 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5269659121090581524 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5282891116465631401 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5307942209004277937 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5398090269717451692 | 1 | 4.55% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2025 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
6 Jan 2026, 03:02 UTC586 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
𝐍𝚵𝐏𝐗𝐅𝐋𝐈𝐍𝚵 — клан, чья верность граничит с безумием, а идеология целиком выстроена на фундаменте Синдрома Де Клерамбо (Эротомании). ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ سأقتلك ، سأقتل الجميع. ❤️ 𝐍𝚵𝐏𝐗𝐅𝐋𝐈𝐍𝚵 не ищет власти или денег. Они ищут подтверждения того, что они не одиноки в этой холодной вселенной. Но их путь устлан трупами тех, кого они «любили слишком сильно», потому что для эротомана нет ничего страшнее, …
custom 52696591210905815241custom 53079422090042779371custom 53980902697174516921
Signed 𝐍̵̷̌̇𝚵̷̸̚𝐕̷𝐄̷̚𝐑̷̸̇̇͢𝐌̷͊𝐎̷̸̴̎𝐑̶̸̸̷̷͠𝐒̷̸̎𝐊̷̸̤̎𝐈̲̍𝐘̸̤̀
18 Oct 2025, 07:32 UTC528 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Я ( @NFV3RM0R ) ставлю патент на название «NEPHELINE» // «NEFELIN» // «NEPXFLINE» во всех его вариациях, включая перевод на иностранные языки. Мы имеем полное право попросить вас поменять название и/или стикер-пак. Незнание об этой конференции не освобождает вас от ответственности. Название придумано лично владельцем. Дата создания — 18.10.2025 ✅ Дата открытия — 01.11.2025 ✅ патент действует даже после закрытия 🤩
custom 52110143920904913503custom 52514938446749665293custom 53055628400719432773custom 53775097270328704653custom 52016715282566663862custom 53033845056738690442custom 53598313152250203692custom 52828911164656314011
18 Oct 2025, 07:27 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @NEPXFLIN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 869,316 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐍𝚵̷̚𝐏𝐗𝐅𝐋̷̱𝐈͢𝐍͎̅𝚵 clsd.” (@NEPXFLIN), 158 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NEPXFLIN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.