А В КАНАЛЕ ПРЕДПРОСМОТР КАРТИНКИ... КАРТИНКА 🙏 https://t.me/LINADAVISEVEN https://t.me/LINADAVISEVEN https://t.me/LINADAVISEVEN

Channel
‼️ ПЕРЕЕЗД ‼️ LINAO7EVEN
@NECROCYBER
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
84subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001853102343 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NECROCYBER |
| Created | 14 July 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NECROCYBER |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 84 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 85 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 85 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 20 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
314 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5366521293724216085 | 55 | 17.5% | |
| custom 5345963093459480294 | 38 | 12.1% | |
| custom 5224515643260286182 | 37 | 11.8% | |
| custom 6309908493763611466 | 37 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5366501970666349152 | 36 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5366212339546745077 | 33 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5260599583364364319 | 23 | 7.32% | |
| custom 5346010870675682939 | 17 | 5.41% | |
| custom 5343898653004154481 | 14 | 4.46% | |
| custom 5343619003388542873 | 13 | 4.14% | |
| custom 5345905115695953432 | 11 | 3.50% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 314reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2025 to 14 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ТЕМ ВРЕМЕНЕМ ВСЕ БОГАТЫЕ МОЛОДЫЕ СИДЯТ НА ПОПЕ РОВНО ЗАРАБАТЫВАЯ ДЕНЬГИ ДЕПОМ... ДЕСЯТЬ ФРИ СПИНОВ ПО РЕФЕРАЛЬНОЙ ССЫЛКЕ 👇🏻 https://t.me/LINADAVISEVEN https://t.me/LINADAVISEVEN https://t.me/LINADAVISEVEN
В КАНАЛЕ ТЕМ ВРЕМЕНЕМ УЖЕ НОВЫЙ НСФВ АРТ.. ДУМАЙТЕ ДУМАЙТЕ https://t.me/LINADAVISEVEN https://t.me/LINADAVISEVEN https://t.me/LINADAVISEVEN
*️⃣🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠*️⃣ просьба НЕ ПОДПИСЫВАТЬСЯ, если вам не интересно мое творчество И если вы не собираетесь активить (ставить реакты/комментить/репостить контент) Я ИЩУ АКТИВНУЮ АУДИТОРИЮ *️⃣🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠*️⃣ эти два года тут незабываемы https://t.me/LINADAVISEVEN https://t.me/LINADAVISEVEN https://t.me/LINADAVISEVEN
custom 53662123395467450774custom 53665212937242160853custom 53460108706756829392
OH SHUT UPP
custom 53662123395467450776custom 53665212937242160854custom 53459630934594802943custom 53665019706663491523custom 63099084937636114662custom 52605995833643643191
ос постинг мм писянутелла с 2022 который должен был быть в базементес лове (моя новелла) ноо гпф прошел и я не сильноумная для гейм девелопминга так что наверное никогда не найду ему применения
custom 53459630934594802948custom 63099084937636114665custom 52245156432602861824custom 52605995833643643193custom 53436190033885428732custom 53460108706756829392
гифт от @puwrkanau большое спасибо 🥰
custom 534596309345948029410custom 52245156432602861827custom 53665019706663491525custom 53460108706756829392custom 63099084937636114662custom 52605995833643643191custom 53436190033885428731custom 53665212937242160851
что хуже это или jimmy urine allegations
custom 53438986530041544815custom 53662123395467450775custom 53665019706663491524custom 53459630934594802942custom 52605995833643643191custom 53436190033885428731
dero goi i know a part of you is still somewhere there so please stop fucking w me and come back alr im not listening to allat christianity bs 🌟
custom 53665212937242160857custom 53459051156959534325custom 53436190033885428734custom 53438986530041544813custom 52245156432602861821custom 52605995833643643191custom 53460108706756829391custom 53665019706663491521
гифт от @morrphinesuffering за что ему огромное спасибо
custom 53665212937242160858custom 63099084937636114666custom 53665019706663491525custom 52605995833643643192custom 53436190033885428732custom 53438986530041544811custom 53459051156959534321custom 53459630934594802941
"Этот крест он вырезал себе сам — кривым ножом, без обезболивающих трав, под чтение псалмов. За каждый грех молодости — новый надрез, за каждую каплю чужой крови — час молитвы. Теперь шрам, грубый и неровный, будто выжженный молнией, служит ему постоянным напоминанием: спасение требует боли, а вера — жертвы."
custom 630990849376361146610custom 52605995833643643194custom 53662123395467450774custom 53665212937242160854custom 52245156432602861822custom 53459630934594802942custom 53460108706756829392custom 53665019706663491522
barbi we need to cook
custom 536650197066634915211custom 63099084937636114666custom 53438986530041544815custom 52245156432602861822custom 53459630934594802942custom 52605995833643643191custom 53459051156959534321custom 53460108706756829391
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @NECROCYBER. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,095,048 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@NECROCYBER named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“‼️ ПЕРЕЕЗД ‼️ LINAO7EVEN” (@NECROCYBER), 84 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NECROCYBER.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.