5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,058–4,068 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:55
4,062
-5
10 Aug 2026, 02:27
4,067
+8
7 Aug 2026, 00:02
4,059
-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:18
4,060
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:45
4,060
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.9%
avg views ÷ 4,062 subscribers
Avg views / post
931
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
20 (5 June 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
4,657
Reactions total
97
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 36s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
550 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
437
79.5%
👍
46
8.36%
👏
25
4.55%
👌
21
3.82%
👎
10
1.82%
🕊
7
1.27%
🙏
3
0.545%
😢
1
0.182%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 550reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«جیمز رندی»؛ شعبدهبازی غیرقابلاعتماد
✍️ احمد بهزادی
نهتنها دلیلی برای اعتماد به جیمز رندی و «جایزۀ یکمیلیوندلاری» مؤسسهش وجود نداره، بلکه شواهدی وجود داره که حتی صداقت رندی رو بهشدت زیر سؤال میبره.
ماجرایی که در ادامه میخونید، تنها یک نمونه از این شواهده و البته حتی همین یک مورد بهتنهایی برای زیرسؤالبردن کارهای یک نفر کفایت میکنه.
توانایی تلهپاتیک سگها
سال 1998، دکتر روپرت شلدریک، زیستشناس و محقق ف…
بتی جین ایدی، تجربهگر نزدیک به مرگ:
بهوضوح دیده و آموخته بودم که بسیار حائز اهمیت است که هرگز با عقاید و اعتقادات روحانی دیگران به مبارزه نپردازم و بهزور درصدد تحمیل اعتقادات و باورهای شخصی خودم نباشم. این را نیز میدانستم که هر انسان براساس سرعت و ضربآهنگ باطنی خویش و بنا به عقاید فعلی خود به پیشرفت معنوی محکمتر و عمیقتری نائل میگردد تا سرانجام به درکی ژرف از نظام عالم هستی دست یابد. با انتقاد از دین و آیین …
👍👍👍
🚫 از مـــسابقهی بیپایانی که اکسپلور اینستاگرام به ما تحمیل کرده، بیرون بیایید. زندگی میدان رقابت نیست که بازنده و برنده داشته باشد. زندگی حقیقی بیرون از «الگوریتم»، به آرامی و در سکوت جریان دارد!
💎 زنــــدگی یک سفر کوتاه است؛ سفری برای تجربه کردن، آموختن و به دست آوردن آگاهی. هر تجربه چه تلخ چه شیرین، قدمی ما را به کشف معنای زندگی نزدیکتر میکند. آنوقت دیگر مهم نیست که در کجای صف ایستادهایم؛ عمیقترین احسا…
📺📺📺
📌 این داستان معروف آلن واتس را شاید شنیده باشید، اما شنیدن دوبارۀ آن در این روزهای ناخوشایند میتواند تسکیندهنده باشد. از آلن واتس نویسنده، سخنران و معلم معنوی بریتانیایی بیش از ۴۰۰ سخنرانی و ۲۵ کتاب برجا مانده است.
@NDEchanel
💠 آیا با هیپنوتیزم میشه تجربۀ نزدیک به مرگ داشت؟
بیایم یه نگاه مختصر به سه تحقیق مرتبط با این موضوع بندازیم:
▪️ تحقیقی که دکتر بروس گریسون (پدر تحقیقات تجربۀ نزدیک به مرگ) و پروفسور ماسایوکی اوکادو (پارسایکولوژیست ژاپنی) در سال 2018 منتشر کردن
توی این تحقیق، افرادی رو که تحت هیپنوتیزم بازگشت به زندگی گذشته، مرگ رو تجربه کرده بودن (تقریباً مشابه هیپنوتیزم دکتر مایکل نیوتن)، با افرادی که تجربۀ نزدیک به مرگ داشتن مق…
🟥🟥ارتباط و صحبت تله پاتییک روح دختر هجرت کرده با مادرش خانم خانم سیلویا فینک
مصاحبه کانال معنویت آلمان
🔴🔴مادر این بیقراری تو نمی گذارد که من اینجا به ارامش برسم.
به او می گویم؛ نمی توانم بیقراری نکنم.
من پر از خشم هستم از تو و از همه چیز. چرا تو در 18 سالگی باید بمیری؟
و او می گوید؛ 🔴🔴باید دنبال راه هایی بگردی که به آرامش برسی. این راه تکامل تو هست.
از او پرسیدم تو هیچ آیند ه ای دیگر نداری؟
جواب داد؛ مادر گوش کن! آی…
گاهی بزرگترین حقیقت را کسانی روایت میکنند که مرز میان زندگی و مرگ را تجربه کردهاند.
«عشق، جوهر واقعی زندگی است.»
این سخن، یادآوری میکند که شاید مهمترین رسالت ما در این دنیا، عشق ورزیدن و عشق را زندگی کردن باشد.
📺📺📺
✔️ مبــــارزه واقــــعی در «اینــــجا» و «اینــــجا» روی مــــیدهد!
📣 ایـــــن کلیپ رو با دقت ببینین و پست پیشین رو دوباره بخونین!
✨ @NDEchanel ✨
✏️✏️✏️
✔️ مـــــا فرشـــــتهایم یا شـــــیطان؟!
🔸 در جــــهان امروز، «سیاست»، «فریب و نیرنگ رسانهای» و «پروپاگاندا حکومتی» چنان پیچیده و درهم تنیدهاند که برای بسیاری از مردم، تشخیص «حق» از «باطل» آسان نیست. جنگهای زمانهٔ ما نیز، مانند بیشتر جنگهای تاریخ، ریشه در «خودخواهی» و «تمامیتخواهی» سیاستمداران و حکومتها دارد، اما لباسی از «تقدس» بر تن میکند. به ندرت میتوان با اطمینان گفت که در یک نبرد، به روشنی، ح…
🖤🖤🖤
✔️ شــــیعیان شهر دالاس آمریکا، غذاهای نذری محرم را بین نیازمندان و بیخانمانها توزیع میکنند و گرسنگان واقعی را سیر میکنند. اونوقت اینجا بعضی از هموطنان ۱۰ تا ۱۰ تا غذا میبرن خونه، تا یه هفته خیالشون بابت غذا راحت باشه!
⛔️ یــــک صحنه که خودم چند سال پیش دبدم و بسیار ناراحتکننده بود؛ به خانمی چند پرس «زرشک پلو» گرفته بود، نشسته بود لب جدول، برنجاش رو میریخت توی جوی آب، و مرغاش رو جدا میکرد که ببره خونه!
…
❤57👏11👎4👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NDEchanel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 760,061 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PDF book @PDFbo0ok · 113,499 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تجربه نزدیک به مرگ / ان دی ئی” (@NDEchanel), 4,062 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NDEchanel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
