Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ПРО_СВЕТ ВЫСШЕЙ МИЛОСТИ, ПРО_ЯВленный в ПРО_стРАнстве через РАзных Своих ПРОводников...

@NATALIYA_SHANTIYA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

438subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002234096539
TypeChannel
Username@NATALIYA_SHANTIYA
DescriptionТем, кто устал от страданий и устремлён к Свету , Сообщается, что БОГ сейчас проявлен через Множество своих ФОРМ... Но глазами Его не увидишь: зорко лишь только Сердце...
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/NATALIYA_SHANTIYA

Growth

4387 Aug 2026, 16:42 — 438 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:15 — 438 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:428 Aug 2026, 05:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 437–439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 05:15438no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:42438first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.4%
avg views ÷ 438 subscribers
Avg views / post
142
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,137
Reactions total57
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
372
Videos
43
Links
259

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

154 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11272.7%
👍117.14%
❤‍🔥95.84%
🔥95.84%
🙏85.19%
🥰53.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC65 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/GLDBqvKacR0?si=zHWfB26HMMnXY1WM

4

7 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @YtbAudioBotFile

@YtbAudioBot

2

23 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC188 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Какая красота... Какая пустота... Не пустота хотящая Что ищет, ждёт всегда. А пустота наполненности И пустота возможности Та пустота, что позволяет Всему здесь быть и жить. Как много было поисков... Молитв и отголосков Искала Его милости В небе и на Земле. Просила только благости А всё случались пакости Казалось, что не выстою Мне Бога бы найти. Звала, кричала, плакала Искала Его в атомах Искала в снах и книгах С ног

6👍6

23 Jul 2026, 08:50 UTC147 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/ryuE4lv2afE?si=O5DXwYti5mFrvu6n

1

23 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC147 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/LUw-j30UDrQ?si=p9cCjtw7GxSiHSWW

1

22 Jul 2026, 05:51 UTC133 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @oly2208

"Каждый шаг на пути отдаю Тебе" - ничего себе не присваивая, не ожидая признания, полностью растворяясь в Свете Источника.❤️

8🔥5🥰2

16 Jul 2026, 05:38 UTC210 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @club4psvPhoto

Никогдa не теряйте вaшей причудливости, вaшей стрaнности, вaшего уникaльного и незaменимого вкусa... Прaзднуйте вaшу уникaльность, и хвaтит извиняться... Здесь нет aвторитетов и нет непрaвильной жизни... Влюбитесь в себя — в это Совершенное, Божественное и очень человеческое безобрaзие... Джефф Фостер7 Фото из интернета https://t.me/club4psv

17

13 Jul 2026, 05:52 UTC232 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Vimana_StrunaFile

Всё, что было позади, Всё, что будет впереди. Только в настоящем ты, Настоящий ты…

12

11 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC284 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не надо усложнять.. Ни дни, ни ночи.. Прокручивать проблемы в голове, Искать подтекст меж чьих-то слов и строчек, Не надо усложнять. Ни в чем. Нигде. Отсейте негатив. Так будет легче, Чем клясть себя, судьбу и что-то там.. Любой из нас намного человечней, Когда в душе нет груза прошлых драм. Не надо усложнять.. Налейте кофе… Окно откройте.. Сделайте глоток.. И отпустите боль и катастрофы, Остатки грусти, горестей, тр

18🥰1🙏1

9 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC208 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ZvetokLyubvi

Мой земной возраст — всего лишь цифра на обочине. Она не имеет ко мне отношения. Внутри меня — совсем другое исчисление: там время течёт по взмаху крыльев, а не по бою часов. Я устала быть тяжёлой. Отпускаю груз забот, как ненужные камни из карманов. Прошлое больше не держит за подол, будущее не манит тревогой — с этим покончено. Я выбрала жить по законам своей внутренней вселенной, а там одно правило: всё, что исти

12🥰1🙏1

8 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC187 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NATALIYA_SHANTIYA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПРО_СВЕТ ВЫСШЕЙ МИЛОСТИ, ПРО_ЯВленный в ПРО_стРАнстве через РАзных Своих ПРОводников...” (@NATALIYA_SHANTIYA), 438 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NATALIYA_SHANTIYA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.