Channel
@NASTIA_psy1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
311subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001558777157 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NASTIA_psy1 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NASTIA_psy1 |
Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 311 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 312 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 314 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 314 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
38 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 63.2% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 18 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Эта важная тема для обдумывания не только в рамках спорта. Такие ошибки родители часто допускают и в учебных процессах ребенка. Дети чувствуют груз ожиданий и с ним очень сложно. Когда ребенка принимают таким, какой он есть, при этом поддерживая и помогая ему, в нем раскрывается его индивидуальность и он способен выбирать и двигаться к своим целям свободно 🤩
❤4👏1
КАК РОДИТЕЛИ ЛОМАЮТ СВОИХ ДЕТЕЙ, ДУМАЯ, ЧТО ПОМОГАЮТ… Я часто наблюдаю как родители критикуют и ругают своих детей во время игры: «тут можно лучше, тут не дотянул, тут не забил». И это не про ребёнка, это про взрослых. Про их нереализованные мечты. Про боль. Про внутреннюю пустоту, которую пытаются закрыть чужими результатами. Первая причина таких реакций: Родитель не реализовался сам. И теперь у него есть «второй…
❤3🙏1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥2👏1
Милые, с праздником весны и женской красоты! 🌷🌷🌷 Пусть в вашей душе всегда живёт тёплая солнечная весна. Пусть открываются новые возможности и сбываются самые заветные желания! Пусть энергия бьёт ключом для самого важного в вашей жизни, а вы всегда будете главной опорой для себя. Желаю любви и мира в сердце, внимания к себе и бережности к своим чувствам. Мы, женщины, умеем быть одновременно и сильными, и нежными …
❤7🥰1🦄1
Разбираем вопрос психологу! ✅ Свидания с мужем, а с кем оставить детей, как организоваться? ✅ Когда бабушки особо не желают оставаться с внуками. ✅ Страхи/переживания мамы. ✅ Роль жертвы и ожидания.
❤4👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Кто сдал сессию, тот вернулся в блог 😁 Друзья, всех с началом весны🌷 Пусть весеннее солнышко принесет хорошее настроение и много позитивной энергии! ☀️☀️☀️ Сегодня разобрала вопрос от подписчицы в формате подкаста. Вы можете присылать свои вопросы в комментариях или в ЛС @NastiyaKhil
❤2🕊1
РАЗБОР ЗАПРОСА КЛИЕНТА! История о том, как начинается эмоциональная измена ❗️ Интересный кейс, где наглядно видно как можно быстро разрушить семью, которая строилась годами, если игнорировать базу в отношениях 👇 Клиентка с мужем проживали кризис в отношениях и ей катастрофически не хватало внимания и тепла от мужа. Они перестали обращать друг на друга внимания и жили как соседи. И однажды ей стал писать мужчина …
👍3❤2🙏1
Активные выходные выдались на славу 🤩 В нельзяграмм загрузила интересные сторис со своими мыслями, решила поделиться и с вами. Сейчас рабочая неделя в самом разгаре. На этой неделе осталось одно горящее окошко на консультацию - завтра 11.02 в 10ч Кто забирает? в личку @NastiyaKhil
❤2😍1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @NASTIA_psy1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психолог 📍 Анастасия Хиль” (@NASTIA_psy1), 311 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NASTIA_psy1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.