Channel
@MystHearts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003201316502 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MystHearts |
| Description | Belongs to @HeartsMyst |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MystHearts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 24 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 24 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2026 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | 183 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reason why we broke up :: We kept trying to fix what had already fallen apart, forgetting that some things can't return to the way they were. We loved each other deeply, but we were exhausted from trying to save something that neither of us knew how to heal anymore. Song recommendation :: 🎧 The Scientist — Coldplay Why this song fits :: It's about regret, longing, and wishing you could go back to the beginning befo…
@auwrora
@anwanoh
Reason why we broke up :: We gave each other beautiful memories and painful ones too. I don't regret loving you, but I know we were hurting each other more than we were healing each other. Sometimes leaving is the kindest thing two people can do. Song recommendation :: 🎧 happiness — Taylor Swift Why this song fits :: It isn't about hate. It's about accepting that both people were good, but they simply weren't good …
glaci read the whisper
Reason why we broke up :: The hardest part wasn't that you hurt me—it was that you didn't. We simply stopped working, and that made moving on even harder because I had no one to blame except time and distance. Song recommendation :: 🎧 i wish you cheated — Alexander Stewart Why this song fits :: Sometimes the most painful breakups happen without betrayal. You just slowly become strangers. ฅ @tierva
Reason why we broke up :: You made me believe we were forever, but forever quietly became a promise neither of us could keep. I built a future around your words, only to realize I was the only one still living in it. Song recommendation :: 🎧 loml — Taylor Swift Why this song fits :: The song is about mourning a future that never happened and realizing someone you trusted became your biggest heartbreak. ฅ @shellwitc
@heartsmyst’s @shellwitch ♥️ read the whisper
Reason why we broke up :: I realized I couldn't keep waiting for someone who had already moved on emotionally. I loved you with everything I had, but love can't survive when only one person is holding onto it. Letting you go broke my heart, but holding on was breaking me even more. Song recommendation :: 🎧 Someone Like You — Adele Why this song fits :: It perfectly captures accepting that someone you love has become…
Kf. @AHNTHEEM read the whisper
ceyaa read the whisper
Reason why we broke up :: We loved each other at the right time but somehow became the wrong people for the future. We kept trying to recreate what we had instead of accepting that we had already changed. Neither of us was the villain—we simply grew into different versions of ourselves, and no matter how much we wanted it to work, love couldn't keep us together when we were walking in opposite directions. Song recomm…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MystHearts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MystHearts named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HeartsMyst Archives” (@MystHearts), 24 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MystHearts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.