Channel
@Mysli_VSlyx3
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,666subscribers
+25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001321789486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Mysli_VSlyx3 |
| Description | Здесь говорят о том, что на душе Присоединяйся мы будем с тобой 💝 Для связи по рекламе(оплата)- @epytko86 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Mysli_VSlyx3 |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Mysli_VSlyx3/5525 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC | @Soulfulpajamas/23253 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @Mysli_VSlyx3/5526 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC | @Soulfulpajamas/23273 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @Mysli_VSlyx3/5528 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC | @Soulfulpajamas/23404 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC | 1.00 | 65 minutes |
| @Mysli_VSlyx3/5529 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC | @Soulfulpajamas/23424 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC | 1.00 | 59 minutes |
| @Mysli_VSlyx3/5530 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC | @Soulfulpajamas/23445 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC | 1.00 | 8 minutes |
| @Mysli_VSlyx3/5532 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC | @Soulfulpajamas/23495 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC | 1.00 | 80 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Soulfulpajamas | 12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 16 minutes | this entry (12–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Mysli_VSlyx3 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
21.3 average views per post against 18,666 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.114%. Across the 24,287 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,618 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.57% and 23.4%, with a median of 11.7%.
| Window | 30 days (19 July 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 53 of 53 published in the window (53 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,131 |
| Mature posts only | 0.119% over 49 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 18,666 measured 17 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:rus · 24,287 channels · p10 2.61% · p25 5.57% · p50 11.7% · p75 23.4% · p90 41.9% |
| Position in cohort | 0.576th percentile · 1/100 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.155% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_source · err_low, last confirmed 18 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 18,666 | -55 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 18,721 | +92 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 18,629 | -22 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 18,651 | -11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 18,662 | -13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 18,675 | -27 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 18,702 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 18,716 | +85 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 18,631 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 18,641 | first reading |
53 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (31 July 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,131 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Учитесь ценить тех, кто рядом. Не нужно бросаться громкими словами и отказываться от человека, если у него в арсенале имеются недостатки. Мы все не святые и просто не имеем права прогибать под себя и свои амбиции весь мир. Невозможно заставить человека меняться исходя из личных интересов и принципов. Ломать - не строить. Этому ещё нужно учиться.
Нужно жить во что бы то ни стало, Прорастать сквозь горечь понемногу, Начинать всё с самого сначала, В мелочах искать приметы Бога. Если в чёрный цвет твой день окрашен, Если утро злое и колючее, Нужно жить, варить на завтрак кашу, Поливать цветы и верить в лучшее. В самых безнадёжных передрягах Продолжай дышать — и станет легче. Иногда достаточно лишь шага, Чтобы снова выпрямились плечи. Если к чёрту катится план…
Mужская cила не в бpутальности. Мужcкая силa в умeнии докaзать жeнщине, чтo она зaщищена. Чтo с ним нaдёжно. Mужская cила - это даpить жeнщине внимaние, нeжность и зaботу. Быть pядом, кoгда ей плoхо, кoгда онa в нём нуждaется. Пoмогать и обеpегать.
🌸Настрой на день🌸 Утро напоминает нам, что счастье всегда рядом — в чашке ароматного чая, в тёплом пледе или в нежном свете солнца. Найди своё утреннее счастье... ❣️Доброе утро, милая!
А знаешь, ведь так мало на свете людей, которые готовы любить нас такими, какие мы есть на самом деле. Любить не за какие-то достижения и заслуги. Не за красивое тело или толстый кошелек. А просто – ЛЮБИТЬ❤️ Любить именно тебя, настоящую, неидеальную. Любить со всеми твоими сомнениями, недостатками и заморочками. Любить и принимать, не пытаясь при этом изменить и переделать… И если в вашей жизни есть такие люди, т…
He дoвoдитe жeнщин дo измeн! He жгитe дyшy гpyбым paвнoдyшиeм... Beдь тoт, ктo нeжнocтью coгpeл, Бeccпopнo, бyдeт caмым лyчшим! He зacтaвляйтe плaкaть пo нoчaм... Иcкaть пpиют мeчтaм paзбитым! И ecли cчacтьe c нeй пoзнaл, Тaк cбepeги ee yлыбкy... Ты cepдцe xpyпкoe нe бeй! Beдь ты жe caм xoтeл быть вмecтe... He дoвoдитe жeнщин дo измeн, Чтoб нe пoзнaть жecтoкoй мecти!
🌸Настрой на день🌸 Будьте великодушными, начните новый день с добрых пожеланий не только для себя, думайте о тех кто с вами рядом. Пусть - это будут мысли о здоровье, любви и благополучии, которые всех обнимут. ❣️Прекрасного воскресного дня, милая!
Давно заметила интересную вещь: от счастливых людей ты получишь лишь счастье, от мудрых и опытных - мудрость, понимание и поддержку. От озлобленных, нереализованных, пассивных в собственной жизни прилетит то, что, собственно, всегда и прилетает: едкая критика, нетерпимость, попытка обесценить всё, что ты делаешь, и уличить в тех грехах и несчастьях, в которых они погрязли сами… ❗️Поэтому, анализируйте, прежде, чем п…
🌿 Какие качества делают человека привлекательным? ✨ Чувство юмора. В любой ситуации важно уметь расслабиться, посмеяться и идти вперед. ✨ Цель в жизни. Страсть к жизни заряжает энтузиазмом. ✨ Решительность. Решительные люди делают то, что им кажется правильным, и не переживают из-за этого.
🌸Настрой на день🌸 Так хочется сказать: "Привет, всем ранним пташкам!" И поделиться лучиком тепла. Даже солнышко ещё спит, а мы уже шуршим с своём новом сегодня. Кто-то затеял тесто на пироги, блинчики или готовит завтрак для своих любимых. А кто-то просто обнимает чашечку кофе и сидя, досматривает сны. Пусть у каждой ранней пташки будет улыбочка на губах и солнышко в душе! ❣️Доброе утро, милая! Ярких выходных🫶
Что может сделать один человек с жизнью другого? Очень много. Может сделать ее ярче или же наоборот - украсть все краски из его жизни. Может подарить любовь или же отнять ее, растоптать. Может заставить бабочек в животе исполнять вальс или же убить их. Может согреть сердце, а может и сделать из горячего сердца обычную глыбу льда. Может подарить улыбку или вызвать слезы. Может подарить радость или же вызвать груст…
Оставаться собой - великое искусство. Потому что на нас «давят» традиции, нормы морали и правила поведения, свойственные нашему окружению. Чтобы не быть изгоями, мы подстраиваемся под них, надеваем социальные маски и утрачиваем свою самобытность. А, часто, если выступаем на своей стороне, то остаемся одним воином в поле и принимаем удар осуждения. Оставаться собой - это самое трудное - это значит глубоко осознават…
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @Mysli_VSlyx3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,500,372 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мысли Вслух 💭” (@Mysli_VSlyx3), 18,666 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mysli_VSlyx3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.